Questioner
Senior Member
- Nov 26, 2019
- 1,593
- 86
- 50
- Banned
- #1
The reality is that welfare recipients are just doing what's in their own evolutionary self-interest; appealing to quaint notions such as a "greater good", "morality" and things like that is rather trite and childish.
If there's no greater good, then of course there's no reason that a person shouldn't do anything they want, or anything they can if it's in their evolutionary interest to do so, whether corporate welfare, or any other form of welfare (false as the dictomy actually is, in practice, given that all "government" in and of itself, is technically a form of "welfare", the absence of which would only exist in an anarchy, which no one is able or willing to participate in.
And if a person on welfare profits from it, c'est la vie; the reality of course is that many idiots, in practice really have no problem with "welfare" as it is in actuality; merely using factual inaccuracies or purely childish and emotional quabbles over certain imagined instances of such, on the basis of certain axioms, while in reality having no problem, if not outright advocating the use or abuse of it, irregardless of the actual law and so forth. I'm sorry if you weren't evolutionarily fit or apt enough to find a way to use welfare to your advantage, having to settle instead for working a worthless job of the lowest moral and intellectual caliber when you didn't even have to, legally or otherwise. Don't be jealous of your inferiority in evolution's hierarchy.
So those who object to it, will have to come up with a better mathematical or philosophical set of axioms altogether; because if one's only appealing to childish "self interest" or whatever, that's exactly what it is, whether "corporate" or ordinary.
If there's no greater good, then of course there's no reason that a person shouldn't do anything they want, or anything they can if it's in their evolutionary interest to do so, whether corporate welfare, or any other form of welfare (false as the dictomy actually is, in practice, given that all "government" in and of itself, is technically a form of "welfare", the absence of which would only exist in an anarchy, which no one is able or willing to participate in.
And if a person on welfare profits from it, c'est la vie; the reality of course is that many idiots, in practice really have no problem with "welfare" as it is in actuality; merely using factual inaccuracies or purely childish and emotional quabbles over certain imagined instances of such, on the basis of certain axioms, while in reality having no problem, if not outright advocating the use or abuse of it, irregardless of the actual law and so forth. I'm sorry if you weren't evolutionarily fit or apt enough to find a way to use welfare to your advantage, having to settle instead for working a worthless job of the lowest moral and intellectual caliber when you didn't even have to, legally or otherwise. Don't be jealous of your inferiority in evolution's hierarchy.
So those who object to it, will have to come up with a better mathematical or philosophical set of axioms altogether; because if one's only appealing to childish "self interest" or whatever, that's exactly what it is, whether "corporate" or ordinary.
