Will Democrats Ever Again Nominate a Woman for President?

[Monoculturalist]

And Roe allowed states to regulate abortion after the second trimester

Roe v. Wade, Explained: A Summary of the Landmark Abortion Case

The Supreme Court overruled it today.

www.elle.com

True, but the problem with Roe was that it turned a state issue into a federal one. Roe was on borrowed time anyway, because viability is a moving target dependent on technology. The second trimester became fair game as viability shifted earlier and earlier due to technological advances.

 

[Lesh]

True, but the problem with Roe was that it turned a state issue into a federal one. Roe was on borrowed time anyway, because viability is a moving target dependent on technology. The second trimester became fair game as viability shifted earlier and earlier due to technological advances.

Borrowed time?

Fifty years is not “borrowed time”


It took the anti-abortion zealots I was referring to earlier 50 years to build a Court that would vote the way they wanted.

Again… Roe allowed STATES to make restrictions after the second trimester

 

[Monoculturalist]

Borrowed time?

Fifty years is not “borrowed time”


It took the anti-abortion zealots I was referring to earlier 50 years to build a Court that would vote the way they wanted.

Again… Roe allowed STATES to make restrictions after the second trimester

50 years isn't that long when looking at the length of various other SCOTUS rulings. And again, if a ruling has a technologically dependent component, that is inevitably going to be something that won't last for the long term.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Really? How were YOU personally punished?

Very high fuel prices, very low freight rates, very low freight volume, very high food prices, very low pay raises. Massive influx of illegal immigrants that I have to deal with at these warehouses I go to.

Perhaps you've been under a nice rock the last 4 years.

 

[Thinker101]

I doubt it. Not in our lifetimes.

Even as other countries – including Italy, North Macedonia and, most recently, Mexico – have in recent years joined the ranks of countries that have elected the first women to their highest political offices, American voters have picked Donald Trump twice over the two women who have come closest to the White House in US history.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/08/politics/glass-ceiling-women-kamala-harris/index.html

They will never make such an announcement, of course. But in the last three elections two women and one man ran against Donald Trump. The women both lost and the man won.

As the 2028 primary approaches, the DNC will lament that it was mysogyny that caused Trump's landslide over Harris, planting the subliminal message to Dem voters that nominating a woman is a recipe for another loss. If the voters don't take the hint and nominate a woman anyway, the DNC can just pull the plug on her and replace her with a man.

The Democrats just don't have many women who are in a good position to run for president. Part of that is due to the Dems following their own DIE policy and filling top positions with women without regard to their qualification. Kamala Harris is exhibit A for that claim.

They may have to figure out what a woman is first.

 

[Blaster]

AOC?

She'll be 39 on election day in 2028

She could never win in a national election.

 

[Foxfyre]

I doubt it. Not in our lifetimes.

Even as other countries – including Italy, North Macedonia and, most recently, Mexico – have in recent years joined the ranks of countries that have elected the first women to their highest political offices, American voters have picked Donald Trump twice over the two women who have come closest to the White House in US history.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/08/politics/glass-ceiling-women-kamala-harris/index.html

They will never make such an announcement, of course. But in the last three elections two women and one man ran against Donald Trump. The women both lost and the man won.

As the 2028 primary approaches, the DNC will lament that it was mysogyny that caused Trump's landslide over Harris, planting the subliminal message to Dem voters that nominating a woman is a recipe for another loss. If the voters don't take the hint and nominate a woman anyway, the DNC can just pull the plug on her and replace her with a man.

The Democrats just don't have many women who are in a good position to run for president. Part of that is due to the Dems following their own DIE policy and filling top positions with women without regard to their qualification. Kamala Harris is exhibit A for that claim.

Hillary and Kamala were not rejected because they are women. They were rejected because they embraced radical Marxist ideology/concepts that the vast majority of Americans reject. If we had an honest media, they would have lost by far larger margins than they did.

 

[IM2]

We've been punished for 4 years. It's finally going to be over. Punished for certifying a fraudulent election.

Make America Respected Again.

You punished yourself by reading/believing dsinformation and lies. The rest of us were doing just fine. America is about to get punished for this choice.

 

[IM2]

Hillary and Kamala were not rejected because they are women. They were rejected because they embraced radical Marxist ideology/concepts that the vast majority of Americans reject. If we had an honest media, they would have lost by far larger margins than they did.

They were rejected because they were women. You have embraced fascism.

 

[Unkotare]

AOC?

She'll be 39 on election day in 2028

But her IQ still won't be as high as 39.

 

[Mac-7]

Right. And we’re both fine with lots of abortions in those states.

I’m not fine but I dont have a vote in those states

 

[XponentialChaos]

I’m not fine but I dont have a vote in those states

You don't have a vote in those states, but you have a vote for the POTUS who said he wouldn't push national abortion restrictions and that he would just leave it up to the states, which you supported.

So you voted to allow lots of abortion in those states. And we agree on that. Those people should be allowed to have lots and lots of legalized abortions.

 

[Mac-7]

You don't have a vote in those states, but you have a vote for the POTUS who said he wouldn't push national abortion restrictions and that he would just leave it up to the states, which you supported.

So you voted to allow lots of abortion in those states. And we agree on that. Those people should be allowed to have lots and lots of legalized abortions.

If you want national abortion laws you are pretty much out of luck

I dont

 

[lg325]

Not just a woman but the right woman. Years back I knew of a lot of both democrats and republicans that would have voted for Barbara Jordan if the democrats would have nominated her.

Barbara Jordan - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Seymour Flops]

Not just a woman but the right woman. Years back I knew of a lot of both democrats and republicans that would have voted for Barbara Jordan if the democrats would have nominated her.

Barbara Jordan - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Barbara Jordan would be a republican today.

 

[lg325]

Barbara Jordan would be a republican today.

Heres her speech at the 1976 convention. Great speech .To all young folks this is how a political convention and public speakingis done..Its in 3 parts.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Not with Big Mike the 2028 favorite...

Not anymore

 

[Billiejeens]

Why not just run Kamala in 2028? Didn’t she run a “perfect campaign”?

Perfect
She will be tanned, res
Wait.

 

[Billiejeens]

They haven't yet legitimately nominated their first one.

Both of them were installed by party hackery and fucking over their voters.

It's the party 's responsibility to nominate someone who can win.

Bernie might have carried 4 states.

 

[Billiejeens]

If theres actually one who is good and viable to be president then why not?!! But just to throw a woman out there so they can insult men by saying they are mysogenists and force them to vote that way.. no I dont think they will try that again.

They will
Learnin ain't their bag.