Woke-Mob California Dems Steal Land And Gives It To Blacks?? WTF!

Biff_Poindexter

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2018
26,844
14,792


"It's been a challenge for years to reobtain the beachfront property seized from Charles and Willa Bruce — a couple who purchased land in Manhattan Beach, California and created a "sanctuary" for Black residents to enjoy the beach amid racial discrimination in the early 1900s. Bruce's Beach Lodge faced intimidation from white residents and the Ku Klux Klan, but the couple didn't back down, Shepard said. The property was eventually taken from the family in 1924 by the city council, which used eminent domain under the guise of building a park. It remained untouched for years.

The land today has been estimated by historians and city officials to be worth approximately $75 million, a substantial fortune that subsequent generations of the Bruce family have missed out on. Officials released a report earlier this month detailing steps to return the property, including evaluating the land's value and certifying the property's legal heirs. The county board of supervisors on July 13 voted in favor of moving forward with the plan."


How are these people able to get away with this?? Why is the state returning land that it rightfully took from some people who really didn't matter anyway? This is a result of all of that cancel-culture-woke-mob-critical race theory crap...they are basically going to go from place to place; taking land from whites and giving it to a bunch of blacks who have no rightful stake or claim to that land. It's time to fight back, it's time to bring back red-lining, whatever tool we can use to return things back to its rightful place.
 
For the love of Pete, it was taken from the family in 1924, they're actually giving it back. The land was stolen from them, it is rightflly being given back to them. Get a grip dude, CRT is out there in full force. This isn't it.
 

"It's been a challenge for years to reobtain the beachfront property seized from Charles and Willa Bruce — a couple who purchased land in Manhattan Beach, California and created a "sanctuary" for Black residents to enjoy the beach amid racial discrimination in the early 1900s. Bruce's Beach Lodge faced intimidation from white residents and the Ku Klux Klan, but the couple didn't back down, Shepard said. The property was eventually taken from the family in 1924 by the city council, which used eminent domain under the guise of building a park. It remained untouched for years.

The land today has been estimated by historians and city officials to be worth approximately $75 million, a substantial fortune that subsequent generations of the Bruce family have missed out on. Officials released a report earlier this month detailing steps to return the property, including evaluating the land's value and certifying the property's legal heirs. The county board of supervisors on July 13 voted in favor of moving forward with the plan."


How are these people able to get away with this?? Why is the state returning land that it rightfully took from some people who really didn't matter anyway? This is a result of all of that cancel-culture-woke-mob-critical race theory crap...they are basically going to go from place to place; taking land from whites and giving it to a bunch of blacks who have no rightful stake or claim to that land. It's time to fight back, it's time to bring back red-lining, whatever tool we can use to return things back to its rightful place.
I'm with the Bruce family on this. Eminent Domain is a bullshit legal way for the government to steal.
 

"It's been a challenge for years to reobtain the beachfront property seized from Charles and Willa Bruce — a couple who purchased land in Manhattan Beach, California and created a "sanctuary" for Black residents to enjoy the beach amid racial discrimination in the early 1900s. Bruce's Beach Lodge faced intimidation from white residents and the Ku Klux Klan, but the couple didn't back down, Shepard said. The property was eventually taken from the family in 1924 by the city council, which used eminent domain under the guise of building a park. It remained untouched for years.

The land today has been estimated by historians and city officials to be worth approximately $75 million, a substantial fortune that subsequent generations of the Bruce family have missed out on. Officials released a report earlier this month detailing steps to return the property, including evaluating the land's value and certifying the property's legal heirs. The county board of supervisors on July 13 voted in favor of moving forward with the plan."


How are these people able to get away with this?? Why is the state returning land that it rightfully took from some people who really didn't matter anyway? This is a result of all of that cancel-culture-woke-mob-critical race theory crap...they are basically going to go from place to place; taking land from whites and giving it to a bunch of blacks who have no rightful stake or claim to that land. It's time to fight back, it's time to bring back red-lining, whatever tool we can use to return things back to its rightful place.
That is a good story. That family was screwed back in 1924 and the movers and shakers used eminent domain to do it, under the guise constructing a community project, that never took place and the land was not returned. Eminent domain has been used time and time again to screw people out of their property for political purpose or to benefit some other private entity's greed, malice or ambitions. It is high time they gave that land back.
 
For the love of Pete, it was taken from the family in 1924, they're actually giving it back. The land was stolen from them, it is rightflly being given back to them. Get a grip dude, CRT is out there in full force. This isn't it.


So its ok to steal it from the people who owned it now? They didnt steal anything from them, what happened was almost 100 years ago. Its not fair to punish people now for what happened before they were born.

Besides, the blacks it was given to werent missing it, it was stolen from their family before they were even born. Its not it was taken from them 5 years ago, it was taken almost 100 years ago. The people who are getting it now never actually owned it.

I bet if someone knocked on your door and said "you need to get out, this land was stolen from a black a 100 years ago" and then kicked you out you wouldnt be like "well gee golly its the right thing to do so Ill just leave my home I spent years paying for, working for and just go so these strangers can have it. Have a nice day". No, youd be mad as hell, but its always easy to not be upset when it isnt happening to you.
 
So its ok to steal it from the people who owned it now? They didnt steal anything from them, what happened was almost 100 years ago. Its not fair to punish people now for what happened before they were born.

Besides, the blacks it was given to werent missing it, it was stolen from their family before they were even born. Its not it was taken from them 5 years ago, it was taken almost 100 years ago. The people who are getting it now never actually owned it.

I bet if someone knocked on your door and said "you need to get out, this land was stolen from a black a 100 years ago" and then kicked you out you wouldnt be like "well gee golly its the right thing to do so Ill just leave my home I spent years paying for, working for and just go so these strangers can have it. Have a nice day". No, youd be mad as hell, but its always easy to not be upset when it isnt happening to you.



Did you even read the story? It was county owned from 1924-1995, and then city of LA owned since. Nobody lived there.....
 
So now you will have an island of privately owned beach that someone will build a multi-billion dollar hotel on. If this continues, Southern California will look like Honolulu with the beaches lined with high rise hotels and little or no access for normal citizens. Now, almost all the beaches in So Cal are publicly owned and in places where the beachfront property is privately owned public access is mandated. The rich beachfront property owners fought that tooth and nail and only when the coastal commission was formed was public access insured. The Coastal Commission is hated by the rich since it's not elected and can't be influenced by their money.
 
For the love of Pete, it was taken from the family in 1924, they're actually giving it back. The land was stolen from them, it is rightflly being given back to them. Get a grip dude, CRT is out there in full force. This isn't it.
does everyone who lost land to EMINENT domain issues GET IT BACK 100 years later?
 
So its ok to steal it from the people who owned it now? They didnt steal anything from them, what happened was almost 100 years ago. Its not fair to punish people now for what happened before they were born.

Besides, the blacks it was given to werent missing it, it was stolen from their family before they were even born. Its not it was taken from them 5 years ago, it was taken almost 100 years ago. The people who are getting it now never actually owned it.

I bet if someone knocked on your door and said "you need to get out, this land was stolen from a black a 100 years ago" and then kicked you out you wouldnt be like "well gee golly its the right thing to do so Ill just leave my home I spent years paying for, working for and just go so these strangers can have it. Have a nice day". No, youd be mad as hell, but its always easy to not be upset when it isnt happening to you.




No, the City must pay the current owners the fair market value, and then return the land to the rightful owners.

That is the RIGHT thing to do.
 
No, the City must pay the current owners the fair market value, and then return the land to the rightful owners.

That is the RIGHT thing to do.
if the land was taken under the principle of EMINENT DOMAIN---how did some private
owners come about?
 
if the land was taken under the principle of EMINENT DOMAIN---how did some private
owners come about?



Eminent domain is used to take property from low property tax paying people, to give to developers who promise to build projects that will pay lots more property taxes.

It's criminal, but happens all of the time.
 
does everyone who lost land to EMINENT domain issues GET IT BACK 100 years later?
Nope...although most of those served some legitimate purpose..and have developed parks, freeways, Jails..and sundry Govt. stuff on them.
In this case..the only reason it was Eminent domain-ed was to keep those uppity black folks from enjoying the beach. The property was not developed and is being rightfully returned to the heirs.
Reparations that work~
 
Eminent domain is used to take property from low property tax paying people, to give to developers who promise to build projects that will pay lots more property taxes.

It's criminal, but happens all of the time.
was that the flimsy excuse way back in the 1920s?
Nope...although most of those served some legitimate purpose..and have developed parks, freeways, Jails..and sundry Govt. stuff on them.
In this case..the only reason it was Eminent domain-ed was to keep those uppity black folks from enjoying the beach. The property was not developed and is being rightfully returned to the heirs.
Reparations that work~
good----THIS is a rare bird-----a racial reparation that actually makes sense
 

Woke-Mob California Dems Steal Land And Gives It To Blacks​


The city council took the land under eminent domain laws as is quite customary. Happens to a lot of people. And the family received compensation for it, $14,000 which was equal today to about $224,000. So the land was not "stolen." What I don't understand is why the land is not being SOLD back to the descendants? Offering to sell the land back, $75 millions worth, for only a quarter million is a very good deal. The irony is that now having given the land back, the family is apt to eventually sell it again anyway, to some rich, white interest.
 
The city council took the land under eminent domain laws as is quite customary. Happens to a lot of people. And the family received compensation for it, $14,000 which was equal today to about $224,000. So the land was not "stolen." What I don't understand is why the land is not being SOLD back to the descendants? Offering to sell the land back, $75 millions worth, for only a quarter million is a very good deal. The irony is that now having given the land back, the family is apt to eventually sell it again anyway, to some rich, white interest.
It's their land..they can do as they please~

I note that you don't address why the land was taken in the first place..that .they did not want to sell it to the Govt.--who were being pressured by the white landowners to put the blacks in their place..that place not being enjoying the beachfront they owned--in full view of those full of hate. This story also does not enumerate the KKK assaults and vandalism.
 

Forum List

Back
Top