Sarah G
When Nothing Goes Right, Go Left
- Mar 4, 2009
- 51,009
- 13,246
Sarah: The fact that a left wing loon wingnut such as you deems me a right wing nut is of no import. You are certifiable, so your opinion is irrelevant.
But you (like so many of your loon pals) start your would be "thought" off with an indefinite pronoun. What YOU might mean by "this" is unknown. The fact that a candidate objects to an invasion of privacy? Is that the "this" to which you take exception? Too bad. You are just an overly partisan political hack. A candidate has a right to privacy which is not forsaken merely by virtue of running for office.
Why can't we see President Obama's college transcripts or admissions applications or anything he allegedly wrote in law school?
You can see anything that is a matter of public record.
So when it suits you, Sarah Partisan Hack Liberal G, a candidate can invoke a right to privacy. This is as most of us assumed. Your position is cheesy, cheap and transparent. But not unexpected.
What you all want is more ammo since what you have already is tired and has been spun to death by your moronic friends.
As opposed to the crap being sought by the idiotic liberoidals/Democratics who are busy demanding "full" disclosure of their Republican or Conservative opponents? Your hypocrisy has no off switch. That's pretty sad.
Those races are tightening, Liability, is that why you're so shrill lately?
SOME races are ALLEGEDLY tightening up. Maybe they are. Maybe they're not. You partisan hack liberoidals live by "polls" when you like what they have to pretend -- err -- say.
And in any event, responding to the shrill cacophonous distortions of the left hardly makes me the one who is "shrill," you dishonest liberoidal hack.
Muddle on, though, girl.
And here we are. Liability having the last word like he always has the last piece of chicken at Sunday dinner...
<Burp>