Well child if you actually read the rulings all they said was the plaintiffs might have a chance to prevail at trial. And remanded the cases back to the trial courts. From what I saw at the 4th circuit I doubt they will hold the same opinion. The 9th will be hearing the case again en banc meaning at least 7 judges will hear it. God only know what they'll do. I'd say considering they are the most overturned appellate court they'll probably sustain the stay. If the two differ it will go to SCOTUS. I think that will result in a 7-2 decision in Trumps favor. And Yates will have egg on her face. Let's see how good a prognosticator I am.
BTW the only appellate court to have heard it so far and rendered a decision was a 3 judge panel form the 9th. Like I said they are looking at the Hawaii case en banc, I think on Thursday.
.
If there were no legal issues, they couldn't have blocked the EO. That's OK. You're a crazy Trump supporter. Facts will never be part of your reality. Believe what you want.
Yet you have yet to produce an order that addressed the presidents authority to issue that EO, you know the constitutional elements and statutes giving him the authority to do so. Go figure.
Now run along and we'll see how it turns out.
.
That's the same dumb argument that Ted Cruz tried, but here is where she made him look like a fool for trying that.
Wow 4 minutes of a 7 minute questioning session, what did you leave out?
.
I didn't leave out the part that shot down your argument. You're free to watch the whole thing on Youtube, if you like.
You saw what you wanted to see, you shot down nothing. We'll know soon enough how it will turn out. I'm not going to argue the same points over and over. But I'll be happy to come back and point out I told you so when the order is upheld and you can feel free to do the same in the unlikely case that I'm wrong.
.