California Girl
Rookie
- Oct 8, 2009
- 50,337
- 10,058
- 0
- Banned
- #81
I agree that continuing to follow AFTER being told by authorities to stop removes his protections under the stand your ground law.
However he may be protected under some self defense laws.
Either way it should be in court, in a trial, with real solid evidence and not heresey and media speculation.
Except.... there remains NO evidence to suggest that he continued to follow Martin after he was advised not to. In fact, he acknowledged that request with 'ok'... and, according to Zimmerman, he stopped following and headed back to his vehicle.
Your response to me is the EXACT reason why I said It should be in court, in a trial, with real solid evidence.....
That is not your decision. It is for the prosecution, and a GJ, to decide whether there is enough real solid evidence to go to trial.
Currently, this seems more like a witch hunt than a desire for justice, to me. If there is evidence, fine... take it to a GJ, get an indictment and take it to trial. If there is not, then that is also fine.