Brynmr
Gold Member
- Jun 12, 2016
- 5,491
- 876
- 290
My avi got 3 responses from you. I guess it's doing it's job.
It is indeed. Just not the job you think it's doing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My avi got 3 responses from you. I guess it's doing it's job.
4My avi got 3 responses from you. I guess it's doing it's job.
It is indeed. Just not the job you think it's doing.
Has a lot to do with it, not my problem you're too stupid to connect the dots!Congratulations. Your comment had absolutely nothing to do with anything.Oh yes, a whole 28 million on the whole freaking continent.. Wow apples to oranges.
Australia Population (2016) - Worldometers
liberals are so stupid. If liberals would stop shooting people's we's cut gun violence bu about 98%
Has a lot to do with it, not my problem you're too stupid to connect the dots!Congratulations. Your comment had absolutely nothing to do with anything.Oh yes, a whole 28 million on the whole freaking continent.. Wow apples to oranges.
Australia Population (2016) - Worldometers
liberals are so stupid. If liberals would stop shooting people's we's cut gun violence bu about 98%
Hey Sydney has 4.29 million peopleHas a lot to do with it, not my problem you're too stupid to connect the dots!Congratulations. Your comment had absolutely nothing to do with anything.Oh yes, a whole 28 million on the whole freaking continent.. Wow apples to oranges.
Australia Population (2016) - Worldometers
liberals are so stupid. If liberals would stop shooting people's we's cut gun violence bu about 98%
And NYC has twice that!Hey Sydney has 4.29 million peopleHas a lot to do with it, not my problem you're too stupid to connect the dots!Congratulations. Your comment had absolutely nothing to do with anything.Oh yes, a whole 28 million on the whole freaking continent.. Wow apples to oranges.
Australia Population (2016) - Worldometers
liberals are so stupid. If liberals would stop shooting people's we's cut gun violence bu about 98%
I thought Australia had no guns?
Wow! So relevant!!!And NYC has twice that!Hey Sydney has 4.29 million peopleHas a lot to do with it, not my problem you're too stupid to connect the dots!Congratulations. Your comment had absolutely nothing to do with anything.Oh yes, a whole 28 million on the whole freaking continent.. Wow apples to oranges.
Australia Population (2016) - Worldometers
liberals are so stupid. If liberals would stop shooting people's we's cut gun violence bu about 98%
Australia has more guns now than before the "confiscation." Nobody "banned guns." Regardless, I don't see how their gun control laws are a failure if their homicide and gun crime rates are a tiny fraction of ours.Hmm. An unfriendly criminal in Australia. How strange.Yes...they still play that odd game in Australia...........the question is...why?
No Cookies | Herald Sun
A 28-year-old man accused of gunning down a young cricketer Rahat Khan in Melbourne’s north has made his first court appearance.
Kamil Yucel, of Dallas, appeared at Melbourne Magistrates Court on Saturday charged with murder, following his arrest on Friday night.
Yucel, sporting a beard and grey windcheater, was remanded in custody during the brief hearing and ordered to reappear in the same court for a filing hearing on Wednesday.
Mr Khan, 20, from Dandenong, died of gunshot wounds in Millewa Crescent, Dallas, on Tuesday evening after a friend driving him pulled over to ask for help.
You seem to miss the point. Australia is routinely held up as an example of success gun control and outright confiscation. So in theory this is impossible. There is no way he could have been shot to death, because banning guns should mean there are no guns.
This shooting is completely impossible.... yet it happened. How? Did the magic of gun control fail? Is Voldemort in Australia magically creating guns? What's going on Harry Potter?
Wow. That brings their total shootings to ??
Why do you insist on posting articles that prove you're wrong?
Yes yes friendly criminals and all that. Nothing to do with it being exponentially more difficult for a criminal to get a gun.Australia has more guns now than before the "confiscation." Nobody "banned guns." Regardless, I don't see how their gun control laws are a failure if their homicide and gun crime rates are a tiny fraction of ours.Hmm. An unfriendly criminal in Australia. How strange.Yes...they still play that odd game in Australia...........the question is...why?
No Cookies | Herald Sun
A 28-year-old man accused of gunning down a young cricketer Rahat Khan in Melbourne’s north has made his first court appearance.
Kamil Yucel, of Dallas, appeared at Melbourne Magistrates Court on Saturday charged with murder, following his arrest on Friday night.
Yucel, sporting a beard and grey windcheater, was remanded in custody during the brief hearing and ordered to reappear in the same court for a filing hearing on Wednesday.
Mr Khan, 20, from Dandenong, died of gunshot wounds in Millewa Crescent, Dallas, on Tuesday evening after a friend driving him pulled over to ask for help.
You seem to miss the point. Australia is routinely held up as an example of success gun control and outright confiscation. So in theory this is impossible. There is no way he could have been shot to death, because banning guns should mean there are no guns.
This shooting is completely impossible.... yet it happened. How? Did the magic of gun control fail? Is Voldemort in Australia magically creating guns? What's going on Harry Potter?
Because their thug culture is less inclined to commit murder than our inner city thugs are.....they obviously have access to all the guns they want or need...but their criminal, thug culture doesn't lend itself to random murder as often as our thugs do....you won't see Australian criminals murdering 9 year olds in alleys because the boys father is a rival gang member.....or murdering each other over facebook insults......
Yes yes friendly criminals and all that. Nothing to do with it being exponentially more difficult for a criminal to get a gun.Australia has more guns now than before the "confiscation." Nobody "banned guns." Regardless, I don't see how their gun control laws are a failure if their homicide and gun crime rates are a tiny fraction of ours.Hmm. An unfriendly criminal in Australia. How strange.Yes...they still play that odd game in Australia...........the question is...why?
No Cookies | Herald Sun
A 28-year-old man accused of gunning down a young cricketer Rahat Khan in Melbourne’s north has made his first court appearance.
Kamil Yucel, of Dallas, appeared at Melbourne Magistrates Court on Saturday charged with murder, following his arrest on Friday night.
Yucel, sporting a beard and grey windcheater, was remanded in custody during the brief hearing and ordered to reappear in the same court for a filing hearing on Wednesday.
Mr Khan, 20, from Dandenong, died of gunshot wounds in Millewa Crescent, Dallas, on Tuesday evening after a friend driving him pulled over to ask for help.
You seem to miss the point. Australia is routinely held up as an example of success gun control and outright confiscation. So in theory this is impossible. There is no way he could have been shot to death, because banning guns should mean there are no guns.
This shooting is completely impossible.... yet it happened. How? Did the magic of gun control fail? Is Voldemort in Australia magically creating guns? What's going on Harry Potter?
Because their thug culture is less inclined to commit murder than our inner city thugs are.....they obviously have access to all the guns they want or need...but their criminal, thug culture doesn't lend itself to random murder as often as our thugs do....you won't see Australian criminals murdering 9 year olds in alleys because the boys father is a rival gang member.....or murdering each other over facebook insults......
Yes yes friendly criminals and all that. Nothing to do with it being exponentially more difficult for a criminal to get a gun.Australia has more guns now than before the "confiscation." Nobody "banned guns." Regardless, I don't see how their gun control laws are a failure if their homicide and gun crime rates are a tiny fraction of ours.Hmm. An unfriendly criminal in Australia. How strange.Yes...they still play that odd game in Australia...........the question is...why?
No Cookies | Herald Sun
A 28-year-old man accused of gunning down a young cricketer Rahat Khan in Melbourne’s north has made his first court appearance.
Kamil Yucel, of Dallas, appeared at Melbourne Magistrates Court on Saturday charged with murder, following his arrest on Friday night.
Yucel, sporting a beard and grey windcheater, was remanded in custody during the brief hearing and ordered to reappear in the same court for a filing hearing on Wednesday.
Mr Khan, 20, from Dandenong, died of gunshot wounds in Millewa Crescent, Dallas, on Tuesday evening after a friend driving him pulled over to ask for help.
You seem to miss the point. Australia is routinely held up as an example of success gun control and outright confiscation. So in theory this is impossible. There is no way he could have been shot to death, because banning guns should mean there are no guns.
This shooting is completely impossible.... yet it happened. How? Did the magic of gun control fail? Is Voldemort in Australia magically creating guns? What's going on Harry Potter?
Because their thug culture is less inclined to commit murder than our inner city thugs are.....they obviously have access to all the guns they want or need...but their criminal, thug culture doesn't lend itself to random murder as often as our thugs do....you won't see Australian criminals murdering 9 year olds in alleys because the boys father is a rival gang member.....or murdering each other over facebook insults......
Yes yes friendly criminals and all that. Nothing to do with it being exponentially more difficult for a criminal to get a gun.Australia has more guns now than before the "confiscation." Nobody "banned guns." Regardless, I don't see how their gun control laws are a failure if their homicide and gun crime rates are a tiny fraction of ours.Hmm. An unfriendly criminal in Australia. How strange.Yes...they still play that odd game in Australia...........the question is...why?
No Cookies | Herald Sun
A 28-year-old man accused of gunning down a young cricketer Rahat Khan in Melbourne’s north has made his first court appearance.
Kamil Yucel, of Dallas, appeared at Melbourne Magistrates Court on Saturday charged with murder, following his arrest on Friday night.
Yucel, sporting a beard and grey windcheater, was remanded in custody during the brief hearing and ordered to reappear in the same court for a filing hearing on Wednesday.
Mr Khan, 20, from Dandenong, died of gunshot wounds in Millewa Crescent, Dallas, on Tuesday evening after a friend driving him pulled over to ask for help.
You seem to miss the point. Australia is routinely held up as an example of success gun control and outright confiscation. So in theory this is impossible. There is no way he could have been shot to death, because banning guns should mean there are no guns.
This shooting is completely impossible.... yet it happened. How? Did the magic of gun control fail? Is Voldemort in Australia magically creating guns? What's going on Harry Potter?
Because their thug culture is less inclined to commit murder than our inner city thugs are.....they obviously have access to all the guns they want or need...but their criminal, thug culture doesn't lend itself to random murder as often as our thugs do....you won't see Australian criminals murdering 9 year olds in alleys because the boys father is a rival gang member.....or murdering each other over facebook insults......
Yes yes friendly criminals and all that. Nothing to do with it being exponentially more difficult for a criminal to get a gun.Australia has more guns now than before the "confiscation." Nobody "banned guns." Regardless, I don't see how their gun control laws are a failure if their homicide and gun crime rates are a tiny fraction of ours.Hmm. An unfriendly criminal in Australia. How strange.Yes...they still play that odd game in Australia...........the question is...why?
No Cookies | Herald Sun
A 28-year-old man accused of gunning down a young cricketer Rahat Khan in Melbourne’s north has made his first court appearance.
Kamil Yucel, of Dallas, appeared at Melbourne Magistrates Court on Saturday charged with murder, following his arrest on Friday night.
Yucel, sporting a beard and grey windcheater, was remanded in custody during the brief hearing and ordered to reappear in the same court for a filing hearing on Wednesday.
Mr Khan, 20, from Dandenong, died of gunshot wounds in Millewa Crescent, Dallas, on Tuesday evening after a friend driving him pulled over to ask for help.
You seem to miss the point. Australia is routinely held up as an example of success gun control and outright confiscation. So in theory this is impossible. There is no way he could have been shot to death, because banning guns should mean there are no guns.
This shooting is completely impossible.... yet it happened. How? Did the magic of gun control fail? Is Voldemort in Australia magically creating guns? What's going on Harry Potter?
Because their thug culture is less inclined to commit murder than our inner city thugs are.....they obviously have access to all the guns they want or need...but their criminal, thug culture doesn't lend itself to random murder as often as our thugs do....you won't see Australian criminals murdering 9 year olds in alleys because the boys father is a rival gang member.....or murdering each other over facebook insults......