15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense

[Indeependent]

Explain grass, shrubs, bushes, trees that don't grow fruit, trees that grow fruit, fruits and vegetables, insects of millions of varieties, birds of millions of varieties, animals of all shapes and sizes, humans.
And how they all survived for hundreds of millions of years evolving into a perfect eco-system.

Those haven't "all survived" so not "perfect" and certainly not humans "for hundreds of millions of years"

Tell that to the evolutionists.

Why don't you offer a competing argument? The complimentary sciences of biology, chemistry, paleontology, etc. are not some grand conspiracy theory as religionists want to believe.

How does letting biological adaptations work over billions of years equate to supernatural "design"? It doesn't. It is an anthropomorphism, and it clearly doesn't apply. Any detailed comparison of the adaptations of nature vs. the claims to supernaturalism, a young earth and claims to various gods leaves religionism as a safe place for fear and ignorance.

The counter argument is that the Creator/Sustainer is the obvious master of all knowledge possessed by mankind and has been more than happy to encourage mankind to discover it and use it to benefit mankind.
Mankind, however, habitually uses it for the powerful few.
Jews do not envision a cruel, jealous, limited God.

An argument in favor of supernaturalism is not a counter argument. It's an unrealized supposition.

Until theology or creation science can come up with a plausible means to investigate the method of supernatural creation, some tentative hypothesis, the beginnings of a framework, then what useful role can they have in advancement of knowledge?

I think arguments are cheapened when people negligently toss around claims of ''creators / sustainers'' and that proof is nothing more than the copy and paste of articles that someone found while scouring the internet. I have no reason to accept the claim that some alleged, supernatural ''master of all knowledge'' is extant in the natural, rational world.

Hollie you have no clue as to how stupid you are. How is life creating itself out of nothing in a pond not supernatural.

Lol

At least you’re consistently pointless. An achievement of some merit, I guess.

Have you found a study on evolution that deals with the Slime Scheme?
Focus.

Remember, this is not MSNBC or CNN where you can spout bullshit without expecting questions.

What is Slime Scheme?

Is that something you study at your madrassah?

Are you so stupid that you forget other people can read your posts?

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.
Now stop being an idiot and address the question of find an atheist that does address the issue.

Ah, a name-caller. That adds a great deal to your saliva-slinging tirades.

Ad hominem.
I have posted the same, clearly stated question at least 20 times and you continue to either make believe you don't understand the question or you are not a very intelligent person.

For the 21st and last time...
How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.

I’m going to count to three....

I doubt you can.

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.\
I can't answer this question because it didn't happen.

Well, you did write: “For the 21st and last time...”. And here you are, again.

The gods are not going to be happy about this.

God is not happy with your unwillingness to seek out an answer to a question.
There's nothing worse than a person who won't seek an answer to a question.

 

[Indeependent]

Explain grass, shrubs, bushes, trees that don't grow fruit, trees that grow fruit, fruits and vegetables, insects of millions of varieties, birds of millions of varieties, animals of all shapes and sizes, humans.
And how they all survived for hundreds of millions of years evolving into a perfect eco-system.

Those haven't "all survived" so not "perfect" and certainly not humans "for hundreds of millions of years"

Tell that to the evolutionists.

Why don't you offer a competing argument? The complimentary sciences of biology, chemistry, paleontology, etc. are not some grand conspiracy theory as religionists want to believe.

How does letting biological adaptations work over billions of years equate to supernatural "design"? It doesn't. It is an anthropomorphism, and it clearly doesn't apply. Any detailed comparison of the adaptations of nature vs. the claims to supernaturalism, a young earth and claims to various gods leaves religionism as a safe place for fear and ignorance.

The counter argument is that the Creator/Sustainer is the obvious master of all knowledge possessed by mankind and has been more than happy to encourage mankind to discover it and use it to benefit mankind.
Mankind, however, habitually uses it for the powerful few.
Jews do not envision a cruel, jealous, limited God.

An argument in favor of supernaturalism is not a counter argument. It's an unrealized supposition.

Until theology or creation science can come up with a plausible means to investigate the method of supernatural creation, some tentative hypothesis, the beginnings of a framework, then what useful role can they have in advancement of knowledge?

I think arguments are cheapened when people negligently toss around claims of ''creators / sustainers'' and that proof is nothing more than the copy and paste of articles that someone found while scouring the internet. I have no reason to accept the claim that some alleged, supernatural ''master of all knowledge'' is extant in the natural, rational world.

Hollie you have no clue as to how stupid you are. How is life creating itself out of nothing in a pond not supernatural.

Lol

So everything is god. How quaint.

God represents intelligence, which is far more likely to create things than nothing.

Do you disagree?

Intelligence doesn’t make deformed and retarded babies.

Maimonides responds...

"...Whatever is formed of any matter receives the most perfect form possible in that species of matter ; in each individual case the defects are in accordance with the defects of that individual matter...."

MOSES MAIMONIDES, THE GUIDE FOR THE PERPLEXED
Part 3, Chapter XII, Titled "Three Kinds of'Evil : (1) That caused by the Nature "of Man" ; (2) Caused by Man to Man ; (3) Caused by Man to himself" Page 267 - 272

Why should I give a fuck what that dude says?

Because he's recognized as one of the greatest geniuses that ever lived.

 

[Taz]

Explain grass, shrubs, bushes, trees that don't grow fruit, trees that grow fruit, fruits and vegetables, insects of millions of varieties, birds of millions of varieties, animals of all shapes and sizes, humans.
And how they all survived for hundreds of millions of years evolving into a perfect eco-system.

Those haven't "all survived" so not "perfect" and certainly not humans "for hundreds of millions of years"

Tell that to the evolutionists.

Why don't you offer a competing argument? The complimentary sciences of biology, chemistry, paleontology, etc. are not some grand conspiracy theory as religionists want to believe.

How does letting biological adaptations work over billions of years equate to supernatural "design"? It doesn't. It is an anthropomorphism, and it clearly doesn't apply. Any detailed comparison of the adaptations of nature vs. the claims to supernaturalism, a young earth and claims to various gods leaves religionism as a safe place for fear and ignorance.

The counter argument is that the Creator/Sustainer is the obvious master of all knowledge possessed by mankind and has been more than happy to encourage mankind to discover it and use it to benefit mankind.
Mankind, however, habitually uses it for the powerful few.
Jews do not envision a cruel, jealous, limited God.

An argument in favor of supernaturalism is not a counter argument. It's an unrealized supposition.

Until theology or creation science can come up with a plausible means to investigate the method of supernatural creation, some tentative hypothesis, the beginnings of a framework, then what useful role can they have in advancement of knowledge?

I think arguments are cheapened when people negligently toss around claims of ''creators / sustainers'' and that proof is nothing more than the copy and paste of articles that someone found while scouring the internet. I have no reason to accept the claim that some alleged, supernatural ''master of all knowledge'' is extant in the natural, rational world.

Hollie you have no clue as to how stupid you are. How is life creating itself out of nothing in a pond not supernatural.

Lol

At least you’re consistently pointless. An achievement of some merit, I guess.

Have you found a study on evolution that deals with the Slime Scheme?
Focus.

Remember, this is not MSNBC or CNN where you can spout bullshit without expecting questions.

What is Slime Scheme?

Is that something you study at your madrassah?

Are you so stupid that you forget other people can read your posts?

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.
Now stop being an idiot and address the question of find an atheist that does address the issue.

Ah, a name-caller. That adds a great deal to your saliva-slinging tirades.

Ad hominem.
I have posted the same, clearly stated question at least 20 times and you continue to either make believe you don't understand the question or you are not a very intelligent person.

For the 21st and last time...
How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.

I’m going to count to three....

I doubt you can.

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.\
I can't answer this question because it didn't happen.

Well, you did write: “For the 21st and last time...”. And here you are, again.

The gods are not going to be happy about this.

God is not happy with your unwillingness to seek out an answer to a question.
There's nothing worse than a person who won't seek an answer to a question.

How do you know that god gives a shit?

 

[Hollie]

Explain grass, shrubs, bushes, trees that don't grow fruit, trees that grow fruit, fruits and vegetables, insects of millions of varieties, birds of millions of varieties, animals of all shapes and sizes, humans.
And how they all survived for hundreds of millions of years evolving into a perfect eco-system.

Those haven't "all survived" so not "perfect" and certainly not humans "for hundreds of millions of years"

Tell that to the evolutionists.

Why don't you offer a competing argument? The complimentary sciences of biology, chemistry, paleontology, etc. are not some grand conspiracy theory as religionists want to believe.

How does letting biological adaptations work over billions of years equate to supernatural "design"? It doesn't. It is an anthropomorphism, and it clearly doesn't apply. Any detailed comparison of the adaptations of nature vs. the claims to supernaturalism, a young earth and claims to various gods leaves religionism as a safe place for fear and ignorance.

The counter argument is that the Creator/Sustainer is the obvious master of all knowledge possessed by mankind and has been more than happy to encourage mankind to discover it and use it to benefit mankind.
Mankind, however, habitually uses it for the powerful few.
Jews do not envision a cruel, jealous, limited God.

An argument in favor of supernaturalism is not a counter argument. It's an unrealized supposition.

Until theology or creation science can come up with a plausible means to investigate the method of supernatural creation, some tentative hypothesis, the beginnings of a framework, then what useful role can they have in advancement of knowledge?

I think arguments are cheapened when people negligently toss around claims of ''creators / sustainers'' and that proof is nothing more than the copy and paste of articles that someone found while scouring the internet. I have no reason to accept the claim that some alleged, supernatural ''master of all knowledge'' is extant in the natural, rational world.

Hollie you have no clue as to how stupid you are. How is life creating itself out of nothing in a pond not supernatural.

Lol

At least you’re consistently pointless. An achievement of some merit, I guess.

Have you found a study on evolution that deals with the Slime Scheme?
Focus.

Remember, this is not MSNBC or CNN where you can spout bullshit without expecting questions.

What is Slime Scheme?

Is that something you study at your madrassah?

Are you so stupid that you forget other people can read your posts?

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.
Now stop being an idiot and address the question of find an atheist that does address the issue.

Ah, a name-caller. That adds a great deal to your saliva-slinging tirades.

Ad hominem.
I have posted the same, clearly stated question at least 20 times and you continue to either make believe you don't understand the question or you are not a very intelligent person.

For the 21st and last time...
How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.

I’m going to count to three....

I doubt you can.

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.\
I can't answer this question because it didn't happen.

Well, you did write: “For the 21st and last time...”. And here you are, again.

The gods are not going to be happy about this.

God is not happy with your unwillingness to seek out an answer to a question.
There's nothing worse than a person who won't seek an answer to a question.

What question?

For the 22nd and last time, answer the question.

 

[Indeependent]

Explain grass, shrubs, bushes, trees that don't grow fruit, trees that grow fruit, fruits and vegetables, insects of millions of varieties, birds of millions of varieties, animals of all shapes and sizes, humans.
And how they all survived for hundreds of millions of years evolving into a perfect eco-system.

Those haven't "all survived" so not "perfect" and certainly not humans "for hundreds of millions of years"

Tell that to the evolutionists.

Why don't you offer a competing argument? The complimentary sciences of biology, chemistry, paleontology, etc. are not some grand conspiracy theory as religionists want to believe.

How does letting biological adaptations work over billions of years equate to supernatural "design"? It doesn't. It is an anthropomorphism, and it clearly doesn't apply. Any detailed comparison of the adaptations of nature vs. the claims to supernaturalism, a young earth and claims to various gods leaves religionism as a safe place for fear and ignorance.

The counter argument is that the Creator/Sustainer is the obvious master of all knowledge possessed by mankind and has been more than happy to encourage mankind to discover it and use it to benefit mankind.
Mankind, however, habitually uses it for the powerful few.
Jews do not envision a cruel, jealous, limited God.

An argument in favor of supernaturalism is not a counter argument. It's an unrealized supposition.

Until theology or creation science can come up with a plausible means to investigate the method of supernatural creation, some tentative hypothesis, the beginnings of a framework, then what useful role can they have in advancement of knowledge?

I think arguments are cheapened when people negligently toss around claims of ''creators / sustainers'' and that proof is nothing more than the copy and paste of articles that someone found while scouring the internet. I have no reason to accept the claim that some alleged, supernatural ''master of all knowledge'' is extant in the natural, rational world.

Hollie you have no clue as to how stupid you are. How is life creating itself out of nothing in a pond not supernatural.

Lol

At least you’re consistently pointless. An achievement of some merit, I guess.

Have you found a study on evolution that deals with the Slime Scheme?
Focus.

Remember, this is not MSNBC or CNN where you can spout bullshit without expecting questions.

What is Slime Scheme?

Is that something you study at your madrassah?

Are you so stupid that you forget other people can read your posts?

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.
Now stop being an idiot and address the question of find an atheist that does address the issue.

Ah, a name-caller. That adds a great deal to your saliva-slinging tirades.

Ad hominem.
I have posted the same, clearly stated question at least 20 times and you continue to either make believe you don't understand the question or you are not a very intelligent person.

For the 21st and last time...
How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.

I’m going to count to three....

I doubt you can.

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.\
I can't answer this question because it didn't happen.

Well, you did write: “For the 21st and last time...”. And here you are, again.

The gods are not going to be happy about this.

God is not happy with your unwillingness to seek out an answer to a question.
There's nothing worse than a person who won't seek an answer to a question.

How do you know that god gives a shit?

Because you're still alive.

Tell us how to add to mankind's quality of life other than being a keyboard cynic.

 

[Indeependent]

Explain grass, shrubs, bushes, trees that don't grow fruit, trees that grow fruit, fruits and vegetables, insects of millions of varieties, birds of millions of varieties, animals of all shapes and sizes, humans.
And how they all survived for hundreds of millions of years evolving into a perfect eco-system.

Those haven't "all survived" so not "perfect" and certainly not humans "for hundreds of millions of years"

Tell that to the evolutionists.

Why don't you offer a competing argument? The complimentary sciences of biology, chemistry, paleontology, etc. are not some grand conspiracy theory as religionists want to believe.

How does letting biological adaptations work over billions of years equate to supernatural "design"? It doesn't. It is an anthropomorphism, and it clearly doesn't apply. Any detailed comparison of the adaptations of nature vs. the claims to supernaturalism, a young earth and claims to various gods leaves religionism as a safe place for fear and ignorance.

The counter argument is that the Creator/Sustainer is the obvious master of all knowledge possessed by mankind and has been more than happy to encourage mankind to discover it and use it to benefit mankind.
Mankind, however, habitually uses it for the powerful few.
Jews do not envision a cruel, jealous, limited God.

An argument in favor of supernaturalism is not a counter argument. It's an unrealized supposition.

Until theology or creation science can come up with a plausible means to investigate the method of supernatural creation, some tentative hypothesis, the beginnings of a framework, then what useful role can they have in advancement of knowledge?

I think arguments are cheapened when people negligently toss around claims of ''creators / sustainers'' and that proof is nothing more than the copy and paste of articles that someone found while scouring the internet. I have no reason to accept the claim that some alleged, supernatural ''master of all knowledge'' is extant in the natural, rational world.

Hollie you have no clue as to how stupid you are. How is life creating itself out of nothing in a pond not supernatural.

Lol

At least you’re consistently pointless. An achievement of some merit, I guess.

Have you found a study on evolution that deals with the Slime Scheme?
Focus.

Remember, this is not MSNBC or CNN where you can spout bullshit without expecting questions.

What is Slime Scheme?

Is that something you study at your madrassah?

Are you so stupid that you forget other people can read your posts?

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.
Now stop being an idiot and address the question of find an atheist that does address the issue.

Ah, a name-caller. That adds a great deal to your saliva-slinging tirades.

Ad hominem.
I have posted the same, clearly stated question at least 20 times and you continue to either make believe you don't understand the question or you are not a very intelligent person.

For the 21st and last time...
How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.

I’m going to count to three....

I doubt you can.

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.\
I can't answer this question because it didn't happen.

Well, you did write: “For the 21st and last time...”. And here you are, again.

The gods are not going to be happy about this.

God is not happy with your unwillingness to seek out an answer to a question.
There's nothing worse than a person who won't seek an answer to a question.

What question?

For the 22nd and last time, answer the question.

Goodbye, retard.

 

[Hollie]

Explain grass, shrubs, bushes, trees that don't grow fruit, trees that grow fruit, fruits and vegetables, insects of millions of varieties, birds of millions of varieties, animals of all shapes and sizes, humans.
And how they all survived for hundreds of millions of years evolving into a perfect eco-system.

Those haven't "all survived" so not "perfect" and certainly not humans "for hundreds of millions of years"

Tell that to the evolutionists.

Why don't you offer a competing argument? The complimentary sciences of biology, chemistry, paleontology, etc. are not some grand conspiracy theory as religionists want to believe.

How does letting biological adaptations work over billions of years equate to supernatural "design"? It doesn't. It is an anthropomorphism, and it clearly doesn't apply. Any detailed comparison of the adaptations of nature vs. the claims to supernaturalism, a young earth and claims to various gods leaves religionism as a safe place for fear and ignorance.

The counter argument is that the Creator/Sustainer is the obvious master of all knowledge possessed by mankind and has been more than happy to encourage mankind to discover it and use it to benefit mankind.
Mankind, however, habitually uses it for the powerful few.
Jews do not envision a cruel, jealous, limited God.

An argument in favor of supernaturalism is not a counter argument. It's an unrealized supposition.

Until theology or creation science can come up with a plausible means to investigate the method of supernatural creation, some tentative hypothesis, the beginnings of a framework, then what useful role can they have in advancement of knowledge?

I think arguments are cheapened when people negligently toss around claims of ''creators / sustainers'' and that proof is nothing more than the copy and paste of articles that someone found while scouring the internet. I have no reason to accept the claim that some alleged, supernatural ''master of all knowledge'' is extant in the natural, rational world.

Hollie you have no clue as to how stupid you are. How is life creating itself out of nothing in a pond not supernatural.

Lol

At least you’re consistently pointless. An achievement of some merit, I guess.

Have you found a study on evolution that deals with the Slime Scheme?
Focus.

Remember, this is not MSNBC or CNN where you can spout bullshit without expecting questions.

What is Slime Scheme?

Is that something you study at your madrassah?

Are you so stupid that you forget other people can read your posts?

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.
Now stop being an idiot and address the question of find an atheist that does address the issue.

Ah, a name-caller. That adds a great deal to your saliva-slinging tirades.

Ad hominem.
I have posted the same, clearly stated question at least 20 times and you continue to either make believe you don't understand the question or you are not a very intelligent person.

For the 21st and last time...
How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.

I’m going to count to three....

I doubt you can.

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.\
I can't answer this question because it didn't happen.

Well, you did write: “For the 21st and last time...”. And here you are, again.

The gods are not going to be happy about this.

God is not happy with your unwillingness to seek out an answer to a question.
There's nothing worse than a person who won't seek an answer to a question.

What question?

For the 22nd and last time, answer the question.

Goodbye, retard.

Yes...

Go on...


And how does that make you feel?

 

[Taz]

Explain grass, shrubs, bushes, trees that don't grow fruit, trees that grow fruit, fruits and vegetables, insects of millions of varieties, birds of millions of varieties, animals of all shapes and sizes, humans.
And how they all survived for hundreds of millions of years evolving into a perfect eco-system.

Those haven't "all survived" so not "perfect" and certainly not humans "for hundreds of millions of years"

Tell that to the evolutionists.

Why don't you offer a competing argument? The complimentary sciences of biology, chemistry, paleontology, etc. are not some grand conspiracy theory as religionists want to believe.

How does letting biological adaptations work over billions of years equate to supernatural "design"? It doesn't. It is an anthropomorphism, and it clearly doesn't apply. Any detailed comparison of the adaptations of nature vs. the claims to supernaturalism, a young earth and claims to various gods leaves religionism as a safe place for fear and ignorance.

The counter argument is that the Creator/Sustainer is the obvious master of all knowledge possessed by mankind and has been more than happy to encourage mankind to discover it and use it to benefit mankind.
Mankind, however, habitually uses it for the powerful few.
Jews do not envision a cruel, jealous, limited God.

An argument in favor of supernaturalism is not a counter argument. It's an unrealized supposition.

Until theology or creation science can come up with a plausible means to investigate the method of supernatural creation, some tentative hypothesis, the beginnings of a framework, then what useful role can they have in advancement of knowledge?

I think arguments are cheapened when people negligently toss around claims of ''creators / sustainers'' and that proof is nothing more than the copy and paste of articles that someone found while scouring the internet. I have no reason to accept the claim that some alleged, supernatural ''master of all knowledge'' is extant in the natural, rational world.

Hollie you have no clue as to how stupid you are. How is life creating itself out of nothing in a pond not supernatural.

Lol

At least you’re consistently pointless. An achievement of some merit, I guess.

Have you found a study on evolution that deals with the Slime Scheme?
Focus.

Remember, this is not MSNBC or CNN where you can spout bullshit without expecting questions.

What is Slime Scheme?

Is that something you study at your madrassah?

Are you so stupid that you forget other people can read your posts?

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.
Now stop being an idiot and address the question of find an atheist that does address the issue.

Ah, a name-caller. That adds a great deal to your saliva-slinging tirades.

Ad hominem.
I have posted the same, clearly stated question at least 20 times and you continue to either make believe you don't understand the question or you are not a very intelligent person.

For the 21st and last time...
How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.

I’m going to count to three....

I doubt you can.

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.\
I can't answer this question because it didn't happen.

Well, you did write: “For the 21st and last time...”. And here you are, again.

The gods are not going to be happy about this.

God is not happy with your unwillingness to seek out an answer to a question.
There's nothing worse than a person who won't seek an answer to a question.

How do you know that god gives a shit?

Because you're still alive.

Tell us how to add to mankind's quality of life other than being a keyboard cynic.

Don’t believe in fairy tales.

 

[Dr Grump]

Not magic...there's science behind creation, unlike there being no science behind evolution.

But I notice you're are incapable of finding any evolutionist to explain my question.

There is plenty of science behind evolution. Fucking hell, you can even google if you are too lazy to go to the library...

 

[Grumblenuts]

And,.. still nothing..

Focus people! Pray with me now:

Dear Lord, My Personal Jesus, Thou Who Art So Big, Fearful, And Mighty,

I, nay we, beseech You, please, oh pretty please!,

Do strike the nuts of brother Grumblenuts with a lightning bolt directly this instant!

 

[Grumblenuts]

..nothing again..

 

[Grumblenuts]

And,.. still nothing..

 

[ding]

And,.. still nothing..

Good call mocking the Creator of existence.

 

[ding]

Explain grass, shrubs, bushes, trees that don't grow fruit, trees that grow fruit, fruits and vegetables, insects of millions of varieties, birds of millions of varieties, animals of all shapes and sizes, humans.
And how they all survived for hundreds of millions of years evolving into a perfect eco-system.

Those haven't "all survived" so not "perfect" and certainly not humans "for hundreds of millions of years"

Tell that to the evolutionists.

Why don't you offer a competing argument? The complimentary sciences of biology, chemistry, paleontology, etc. are not some grand conspiracy theory as religionists want to believe.

How does letting biological adaptations work over billions of years equate to supernatural "design"? It doesn't. It is an anthropomorphism, and it clearly doesn't apply. Any detailed comparison of the adaptations of nature vs. the claims to supernaturalism, a young earth and claims to various gods leaves religionism as a safe place for fear and ignorance.

The counter argument is that the Creator/Sustainer is the obvious master of all knowledge possessed by mankind and has been more than happy to encourage mankind to discover it and use it to benefit mankind.
Mankind, however, habitually uses it for the powerful few.
Jews do not envision a cruel, jealous, limited God.

An argument in favor of supernaturalism is not a counter argument. It's an unrealized supposition.

Until theology or creation science can come up with a plausible means to investigate the method of supernatural creation, some tentative hypothesis, the beginnings of a framework, then what useful role can they have in advancement of knowledge?

I think arguments are cheapened when people negligently toss around claims of ''creators / sustainers'' and that proof is nothing more than the copy and paste of articles that someone found while scouring the internet. I have no reason to accept the claim that some alleged, supernatural ''master of all knowledge'' is extant in the natural, rational world.

Hollie you have no clue as to how stupid you are. How is life creating itself out of nothing in a pond not supernatural.

Lol

So everything is god. How quaint.

God represents intelligence, which is far more likely to create things than nothing.

Do you disagree?

Intelligence doesn’t make deformed and retarded babies.

Maimonides responds...

"...Whatever is formed of any matter receives the most perfect form possible in that species of matter ; in each individual case the defects are in accordance with the defects of that individual matter...."

MOSES MAIMONIDES, THE GUIDE FOR THE PERPLEXED
Part 3, Chapter XII, Titled "Three Kinds of'Evil : (1) That caused by the Nature "of Man" ; (2) Caused by Man to Man ; (3) Caused by Man to himself" Page 267 - 272

Why should I give a fuck what that dude says?

You should always care what logic says, Taz.

 

[ding]

Explain grass, shrubs, bushes, trees that don't grow fruit, trees that grow fruit, fruits and vegetables, insects of millions of varieties, birds of millions of varieties, animals of all shapes and sizes, humans.
And how they all survived for hundreds of millions of years evolving into a perfect eco-system.

Those haven't "all survived" so not "perfect" and certainly not humans "for hundreds of millions of years"

Tell that to the evolutionists.

Why don't you offer a competing argument? The complimentary sciences of biology, chemistry, paleontology, etc. are not some grand conspiracy theory as religionists want to believe.

How does letting biological adaptations work over billions of years equate to supernatural "design"? It doesn't. It is an anthropomorphism, and it clearly doesn't apply. Any detailed comparison of the adaptations of nature vs. the claims to supernaturalism, a young earth and claims to various gods leaves religionism as a safe place for fear and ignorance.

The counter argument is that the Creator/Sustainer is the obvious master of all knowledge possessed by mankind and has been more than happy to encourage mankind to discover it and use it to benefit mankind.
Mankind, however, habitually uses it for the powerful few.
Jews do not envision a cruel, jealous, limited God.

An argument in favor of supernaturalism is not a counter argument. It's an unrealized supposition.

Until theology or creation science can come up with a plausible means to investigate the method of supernatural creation, some tentative hypothesis, the beginnings of a framework, then what useful role can they have in advancement of knowledge?

I think arguments are cheapened when people negligently toss around claims of ''creators / sustainers'' and that proof is nothing more than the copy and paste of articles that someone found while scouring the internet. I have no reason to accept the claim that some alleged, supernatural ''master of all knowledge'' is extant in the natural, rational world.

Hollie you have no clue as to how stupid you are. How is life creating itself out of nothing in a pond not supernatural.

Lol

At least you’re consistently pointless. An achievement of some merit, I guess.

Have you found a study on evolution that deals with the Slime Scheme?
Focus.

Remember, this is not MSNBC or CNN where you can spout bullshit without expecting questions.

What is Slime Scheme?

Is that something you study at your madrassah?

Are you so stupid that you forget other people can read your posts?

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.
Now stop being an idiot and address the question of find an atheist that does address the issue.

Ah, a name-caller. That adds a great deal to your saliva-slinging tirades.

Ad hominem.
I have posted the same, clearly stated question at least 20 times and you continue to either make believe you don't understand the question or you are not a very intelligent person.

For the 21st and last time...
How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.

I’m going to count to three....

I doubt you can.

How did millions of asexual slime get together and decide to form, over hundreds of millions of years, into millions of male/female species.\
I can't answer this question because it didn't happen.

Well, you did write: “For the 21st and last time...”. And here you are, again.

The gods are not going to be happy about this.

God is not happy with your unwillingness to seek out an answer to a question.
There's nothing worse than a person who won't seek an answer to a question.

How do you know that god gives a shit?

Because you're still alive.

Tell us how to add to mankind's quality of life other than being a keyboard cynic.

Don’t believe in fairy tales.

They only seem like fairy tales to you because that's what you are looking for, Taz.

 

[Grumblenuts]

And,.. still nothing..

Good call mocking the Creator of existence.

Thanks. But I'm performing a scientific experiment. You're welcome to try replicating my results. Everyone else too! Pray for your god to strike you, me, or anyone else you can monitor, with lightning and report the results here. It's like evolution theory. Real Science!

 

[ding]

And,.. still nothing..

Good call mocking the Creator of existence.

Thanks. But I'm performing a scientific experiment. You're welcome to try replicating my results. Everyone else too! Pray for your god to strike you, me, or anyone else you can monitor, with lightning and report the results here. It's like evolution theory. Real Science!

Garbage in equals garbage out. If you start from a flawed position, it doesn't prove what you think it means. It only serves to confirm your bias.

But please do continue mocking God, it's only harming you. It's not harming God or those who love God.

 

[Grumblenuts]

And,.. still nothing..

Good call mocking the Creator of existence.

Thanks. But I'm performing a scientific experiment. You're welcome to try replicating my results. Everyone else too! Pray for your god to strike you, me, or anyone else you can monitor, with lightning and report the results here. It's like evolution theory. Real Science!

Garbage in equals garbage out. If you start from a flawed position, it doesn't prove what you think it means. It only serves to confirm your bias.

Yes, you just said essentially nothing. Great job!

 

[ding]

And,.. still nothing..

Good call mocking the Creator of existence.

Thanks. But I'm performing a scientific experiment. You're welcome to try replicating my results. Everyone else too! Pray for your god to strike you, me, or anyone else you can monitor, with lightning and report the results here. It's like evolution theory. Real Science!

Garbage in equals garbage out. If you start from a flawed position, it doesn't prove what you think it means. It only serves to confirm your bias.

Yes, you just said essentially nothing. Great job!

That's what you heard because that was what you wanted to hear.

 

[ding]

You are going to lose this battle.