2017 Co2 watch thread--How high will it go?

[ScienceRocks]

I really couldn't care less about what any of you anti-science assholes think.

I'll keep posting data. I know you want to shut it all down and that tells me exactly what you're all about...

I really couldn't care less about what any of you easily led, anti-economics assholes think.

I get a kick out of Mathew because he thinks he understands science.

A lot more than an asshole like you and that also goes for Politics, Economics and many other issues. In any case I follow much more intelligent people called scientist instead of fat pigs on the AM radio like you.

You hate civilization but want to act like you understand the institutions of it? hahaha

 

[bripat9643]

I really couldn't care less about what any of you anti-science assholes think.

I'll keep posting data. I know you want to shut it all down and that tells me exactly what you're all about...

I really couldn't care less about what any of you easily led, anti-economics assholes think.

I get a kick out of Mathew because he thinks he understands science.

A lot more than an asshole like you and that also goes for Politics, Economics and many other issues. In any case I follow much more intelligent people called scientist instead of fat pigs on the AM radio like you.

You hate civilization but want to act like you understand the institutions of it? hahaha

Every time you post you only prove your ignorance of science.

 

[ScienceRocks]

At least I aint arrogant enough to think i know more than nearly all the worlds scientist unlike you idiots.

You clowns really believe that you're all that? hahahahaha! You're making me laugh. Fucked up visions of godhood you have.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Little man,

You don't know shit. All you think you know is you want to shut it all down and burn everything to the ground...What a fucking joke you're.

 

[bripat9643]

At least I aint arrogant enough to think i know more than nearly all the worlds scientist unlike you idiots.

You clowns really believe that you're all that? hahahahaha! You're making me laugh. Fucked up visions of godhood you have.

I hate to break it to you, Mathew, but all the world's scientists don't buy the AGW hocus-pocus. The 97% claim is fake news.

Obama's '97 Percent' Climate Consensus: debunked, demolished, staked through the heart - Breitbart

The Myth of the Climate Change ‘97%’

 

[bripat9643]

Little man,

You don't know shit. All you think you know is you want to shut it all down and burn everything to the ground...What a fucking joke you're.

The AGW cult members are the ones who want to shut it all down. They want to shut down our economy and make us all live like Medieval serfs.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Thankfully, for my sanity I am now Ignoring another person.

 

[ding]

Week beginning on November 13, 2016: 403.74 ppm

Some predictions
1. We'll have a daily high of >= 412ppm
2. Weekly high of over 411ppm
ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/products/trends/co2/co2_weekly_mlo.txt

3. Peak Monthly around 409.75-410.25ppm

This thread is for data and the discussion of such...I aint replying to you if you make a remark outside of this...

It is called an interglacial cycle. I wouldn't be surprised if global temperatures rose another 1.4C to 2.4C because of it.

 

[Old Rocks]

Little man,

You don't know shit. All you think you know is you want to shut it all down and burn everything to the ground...What a fucking joke you're.

The AGW cult members are the ones who want to shut it all down. They want to shut down our economy and make us all live like Medieval serfs.

My, my, another lying little dumb fuck. LOL No, we want to move on to a world of less expensive energy that does not pollute. We want a world for our grandchildren better than, or at least as good as, the one we inherited. We are on course to give them a far poorer record than we inherited. And you are all for that.

 

[Old Rocks]

Week beginning on November 13, 2016: 403.74 ppm

Some predictions
1. We'll have a daily high of >= 412ppm
2. Weekly high of over 411ppm
ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/products/trends/co2/co2_weekly_mlo.txt

3. Peak Monthly around 409.75-410.25ppm

This thread is for data and the discussion of such...I aint replying to you if you make a remark outside of this...

It is called an interglacial cycle. I wouldn't be surprised if global temperatures rose another 1.4C to 2.4C because of it.

How is Today’s Warming Different from the Past?
Earth has experienced climate change in the past without help from humanity. We know about past climates because of evidence left in tree rings, layers of ice in glaciers, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks. For example, bubbles of air in glacial ice trap tiny samples of Earth’s atmosphere, giving scientists a history of greenhouse gases that stretches back more than 800,000 years. The chemical make-up of the ice provides clues to the average global temperature.

See the Earth Observatory’s series Paleoclimatology for details about how scientists study past climates.

Glacial ice and air bubbles trapped in it (top) preserve an 800,000-year record of temperature & carbon dioxide. Earth has cycled between ice ages (low points, large negative anomalies) and warm interglacials (peaks). (Photograph courtesy National Snow & Ice Data Center.NASA graph by Robert Simmon, based on data from Jouzel et al., 2007.)

Using this ancient evidence, scientists have built a record of Earth’s past climates, or “paleoclimates.” The paleoclimate record combined with global models shows past ice ages as well as periods even warmer than today. But the paleoclimate record also reveals that the current climatic warming is occurring much more rapidly than past warming events.

As the Earth moved out of ice ages over the past million years, the global temperature rose a total of 4 to 7 degrees Celsius over about 5,000 years. In the past century alone, the temperature has climbed 0.7 degrees Celsius, roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming.

Temperature histories from paleoclimate data (green line) compared to the history based on modern instruments (blue line) suggest that global temperature is warmer now than it has been in the past 1,000 years, and possibly longer. (Graph adapted from Mann et al., 2008.)

Models predict that Earth will warm between 2 and 6 degrees Celsius in the next century. When global warming has happened at various times in the past two million years, it has taken the planet about 5,000 years to warm 5 degrees. The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster. This rate of change is extremely unusual.


Global WarmingIs Current Warming Natural?
Global Warming : Feature Articles

Dear little johnny one note. See the link? So give links to your original sources for the graphs you use. Bet all them have interpretations 180 degrees to your interpretations. Certainly the source of the graphs for the ice ages says your interpretation is bullshit. Who do we trust, an anonymous poster, or NASA?

 

[ding]

Week beginning on November 13, 2016: 403.74 ppm

Some predictions
1. We'll have a daily high of >= 412ppm
2. Weekly high of over 411ppm
ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/products/trends/co2/co2_weekly_mlo.txt

3. Peak Monthly around 409.75-410.25ppm

This thread is for data and the discussion of such...I aint replying to you if you make a remark outside of this...

It is called an interglacial cycle. I wouldn't be surprised if global temperatures rose another 1.4C to 2.4C because of it.

How is Today’s Warming Different from the Past?
Earth has experienced climate change in the past without help from humanity. We know about past climates because of evidence left in tree rings, layers of ice in glaciers, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks. For example, bubbles of air in glacial ice trap tiny samples of Earth’s atmosphere, giving scientists a history of greenhouse gases that stretches back more than 800,000 years. The chemical make-up of the ice provides clues to the average global temperature.

See the Earth Observatory’s series Paleoclimatology for details about how scientists study past climates.

Glacial ice and air bubbles trapped in it (top) preserve an 800,000-year record of temperature & carbon dioxide. Earth has cycled between ice ages (low points, large negative anomalies) and warm interglacials (peaks). (Photograph courtesy National Snow & Ice Data Center.NASA graph by Robert Simmon, based on data from Jouzel et al., 2007.)

Using this ancient evidence, scientists have built a record of Earth’s past climates, or “paleoclimates.” The paleoclimate record combined with global models shows past ice ages as well as periods even warmer than today. But the paleoclimate record also reveals that the current climatic warming is occurring much more rapidly than past warming events.

As the Earth moved out of ice ages over the past million years, the global temperature rose a total of 4 to 7 degrees Celsius over about 5,000 years. In the past century alone, the temperature has climbed 0.7 degrees Celsius, roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming.

Temperature histories from paleoclimate data (green line) compared to the history based on modern instruments (blue line) suggest that global temperature is warmer now than it has been in the past 1,000 years, and possibly longer. (Graph adapted from Mann et al., 2008.)

Models predict that Earth will warm between 2 and 6 degrees Celsius in the next century. When global warming has happened at various times in the past two million years, it has taken the planet about 5,000 years to warm 5 degrees. The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster. This rate of change is extremely unusual.


Global WarmingIs Current Warming Natural?
Global Warming : Feature Articles

Dear little johnny one note. See the link? So give links to your original sources for the graphs you use. Bet all them have interpretations 180 degrees to your interpretations. Certainly the source of the graphs for the ice ages says your interpretation is bullshit. Who do we trust, an anonymous poster, or NASA?

When are you going to acknowledge that our present temperature is still 1.4C to 2.4C below the peak temperature of three of the last four interglacials?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Little man,

You don't know shit. All you think you know is you want to shut it all down and burn everything to the ground...What a fucking joke you're.

The AGW cult members are the ones who want to shut it all down. They want to shut down our economy and make us all live like Medieval serfs.

My, my, another lying little dumb fuck. LOL No, we want to move on to a world of less expensive energy that does not pollute. We want a world for our grandchildren better than, or at least as good as, the one we inherited. We are on course to give them a far poorer record than we inherited. And you are all for that.

No, we want to move on to a world of less expensive energy that does not pollute.

That leaves out wind and solar........

 

[ScienceRocks]

December 10: 404.12 ppm

 

[skookerasbil]

Articles: Pruitt to Dismantle EPA Climate Agenda

ppm has never been more irrelvant

 

[flacaltenn]

December 10: 404.12 ppm

It was higher a month ago Matthew. What happened? Less turkeys around or something?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Articles: Pruitt to Dismantle EPA Climate Agenda

ppm has never been more irrelvant [sic]

I think that where the term “ppm” is being used in this thread, that it usually represents something other than what most of us usually assume it to mean. Something about the IQ of the person using the term, multiplied by a factor of ten.

 

[ScienceRocks]

December 10: 404.12 ppm

It was higher a month ago Matthew. What happened? Less turkeys around or something?

It bounces around quite a bit in Nov, Dec, and Jan.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Articles: Pruitt to Dismantle EPA Climate Agenda

ppm has never been more irrelvant

And like Gavin said, the climate of our planet doesn't care about our political idiocy. Not one damn bit.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

And like Gavin said, the climate of our planet doesn't care about our political idiocy. Not one damn bit.

And yet, it's being used as an excuse for and by some of the very deepest, darkest elements of political idiocy.

 

[ScienceRocks]