ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
I thought...man, this story the prosecuter is matching the entire story put out in the press. Isnt that a coinky dink? Sure they were sequestered so they could watch the TV and copy the story but they wouldnt do that tho
Ferguson chief Officer didn t stop Brown as rob suspect - CNN.com
Watch the video:
Ferguson, Missouri (CNN) -- The Ferguson police officer who shot Michael Brown didn't stop him because he was suspected in a convenience-store robbery, but because he was "walking down the middle of the street blocking traffic," the city's police chief said Friday.
Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson -- hours after documents came out labeling the 18-year-old Brown as the "primary suspect" in the store theft -- told reporters the "robbery does not relate to the initial contact between the officer and Michael Brown."
So why did Ferguson police opt to release surveillance video of the convenience-store incident Friday -- the same day they named, six days after the shooting, the white police officer who fatally shot the African-American teenager -- if the two situations aren't related?
For cover and deflection silly goose...of course. I'm sorry, I'm just assuming that the police chief knows what goes on there for some reason.
-The chief added "we needed to release that at the same time we needed to release the name of the officer involved in the shooting," though he didn't elaborate on why. Identifying the officer was one key demand of demonstrators, along with pressing for other details on the shooting amid allegations of a police coverup. -
For background, thats why he released it....but suddenly once their smear campaign got traction NOW from the prosecutor that the chief lied....or the prosecutor lied...but since we have to dig for the truth the lie is making its rounds. Just like this video did
Ferguson chief Officer didn t stop Brown as rob suspect - CNN.com
Watch the video:
Ferguson, Missouri (CNN) -- The Ferguson police officer who shot Michael Brown didn't stop him because he was suspected in a convenience-store robbery, but because he was "walking down the middle of the street blocking traffic," the city's police chief said Friday.
Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson -- hours after documents came out labeling the 18-year-old Brown as the "primary suspect" in the store theft -- told reporters the "robbery does not relate to the initial contact between the officer and Michael Brown."
So why did Ferguson police opt to release surveillance video of the convenience-store incident Friday -- the same day they named, six days after the shooting, the white police officer who fatally shot the African-American teenager -- if the two situations aren't related?
For cover and deflection silly goose...of course. I'm sorry, I'm just assuming that the police chief knows what goes on there for some reason.
-The chief added "we needed to release that at the same time we needed to release the name of the officer involved in the shooting," though he didn't elaborate on why. Identifying the officer was one key demand of demonstrators, along with pressing for other details on the shooting amid allegations of a police coverup. -
For background, thats why he released it....but suddenly once their smear campaign got traction NOW from the prosecutor that the chief lied....or the prosecutor lied...but since we have to dig for the truth the lie is making its rounds. Just like this video did