5.7% of Clinton Foundation Actually went to Charity

[Picaro]

Some insight into how these 'Foundation' foreign affiliates work here.

Canadian affiliate charity of Clinton Foundation defends expenses

Maybe somebody might find a link between the 'mining interests' involved here and the 'mining interests' in Kazakhstan, another big fave 'donor' and 'speech' destination for the Clintons?

Ever heard of Vinod Gupta? Victor Dahdaleh? Rolando Gonzalez Bunster? Sant Chatwal? The Clintons think these people make great trustees.

 

[aris2chat]

Does the Salvation Army do good work? How much of their money do they give to other charities?

None?

lol

Link to the Salvation Army being a part of the Clinton Foundation?

link to you and the nazi and the commie party thats a easy one...

We know where you stand....

View attachment 90022

Rule by the people and constitution

not by criminals and traitors

 

[Picaro]

Clinton Foundation internal auditors info.

EXCLUSIVE: Clinton Foundation Auditor Has Troubled Regulatory History

the daily caller ??? really !!!! thats your best source ??? how about the IRS ... the clintons would have to list anything that the foundation gave them on their taxes ...if the foundation paid for anything they would have to pay a gift tax ... guess what moron??? theres nothing on their tax forms about receiving gifts or money for plain flights or a salary of any kind ... here is the site that not only lister her tax forms but her health records ... read it and weep morons
[Comms] Tax Returns

More stupid drivel. The Caller article cites its sources, dipwad, so good luck with your sniveling idiotic 'rebuttal' here.

well dick smoker, its not based on any factual information ... is it on their tax forms dick smoker??? no its not ... you can't stand that Idea ...don't you thing well we know you don't think other wise you would have said such a stupid thing here... if they tried to hid something on a 990 form don't you think every right wing bozo would see that ... guess you're one right wing dick smoker that didn't see it, huh!!! the Irs would be all over them ...

Clinton Foundation internal auditors info.

EXCLUSIVE: Clinton Foundation Auditor Has Troubled Regulatory History

the daily caller ??? really !!!! thats your best source ??? how about the IRS ... the clintons would have to list anything that the foundation gave them on their taxes ...if the foundation paid for anything they would have to pay a gift tax ... guess what moron??? theres nothing on their tax forms about receiving gifts or money for plain flights or a salary of any kind ... here is the site that not only lister her tax forms but her health records ... read it and weep morons
[Comms] Tax Returns

More stupid drivel. The Caller article cites its sources, dipwad, so good luck with your sniveling idiotic 'rebuttal' here.

they right wing sources dick smoker

awww... da wittle diaper boi is all butt hurt n stuff. ain't it cute?

Inability to refute anything here duly noted. Grade F; needs bigger ad hom vocabulary, but poor reading skills and mental illness prevents improvements.

 

[aris2chat]

Clinton Foundation internal auditors info.

EXCLUSIVE: Clinton Foundation Auditor Has Troubled Regulatory History

the daily caller ??? really !!!! thats your best source ??? how about the IRS ... the clintons would have to list anything that the foundation gave them on their taxes ...if the foundation paid for anything they would have to pay a gift tax ... guess what moron??? theres nothing on their tax forms about receiving gifts or money for plain flights or a salary of any kind ... here is the site that not only lister her tax forms but her health records ... read it and weep morons
[Comms] Tax Returns

More stupid drivel. The Caller article cites its sources, dipwad, so good luck with your sniveling idiotic 'rebuttal' here.

well dick smoker, its not based on any factual information ... is it on their tax forms dick smoker??? no its not ... you can't stand that Idea ...don't you thing well we know you don't think other wise you would have said such a stupid thing here... if they tried to hid something on a 990 form don't you think every right wing bozo would see that ... guess you're one right wing dick smoker that didn't see it, huh!!! the Irs would be all over them ...

Clinton Foundation internal auditors info.

EXCLUSIVE: Clinton Foundation Auditor Has Troubled Regulatory History

the daily caller ??? really !!!! thats your best source ??? how about the IRS ... the clintons would have to list anything that the foundation gave them on their taxes ...if the foundation paid for anything they would have to pay a gift tax ... guess what moron??? theres nothing on their tax forms about receiving gifts or money for plain flights or a salary of any kind ... here is the site that not only lister her tax forms but her health records ... read it and weep morons
[Comms] Tax Returns

More stupid drivel. The Caller article cites its sources, dipwad, so good luck with your sniveling idiotic 'rebuttal' here.

they right wing sources dick smoker

awww... da wittle diaper boi is all butt hurt n stuff. ain't it cute?

Inability to refute anything here duly noted. Grade F; needs bigger ad hom vocabulary, but poor reading skills and mental illness prevents improvements.

Ad hominem........can't argue the facts, attack the source or character of the person

 

[Jroc]

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ | New York Post

YOUR SOURCES IS A BIT OUT DATED TRY AGAIN FROM A FELLOW POSTER...
Do have a clue how the Clinton Foundation works...

Lets start with Chelsea's 'huge amounts':

Do the Clintons receive any income or personal expense reimbursement from the Foundation?
No. President Clinton and Chelsea Clinton, who serve on the Board of Directors, do not take a salary from the Clinton Foundation and receive no funding from it. Secretary Clinton did not take a salary when she served on the Board of Directors.

Frequently Asked Questions

FOOL!!!!!!

The Clinton Presidential Center has an educational facilities and offices set up by the Clinton Foundation which is sited on the Presidential Library site... So this is them paying for that... There is also scholarships...

So what's your point... Do you want them to use the Reagan Library?

Clinton friends and political allies are employment by the foundation. that source the last report form Charity Watch before the current one

 

[Jackson]

Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charity

Guess the rest is called OSF "Our Slush Fund."

So the donors did not get that soft, good feeling for helping others around the globe. Just what did they get?

As many times as the Daily Liar has been caught lying, how can anyone be STUPID enough to still believe the premeditated liars?????

The two foremost charity watchdog organizations Charity Navigator (97.47 out of 100 overall rating, and 97.50 out of 100 financial rating) and Charity Watch (A rating and 88% of income going to charity operations) expose this typical Right-wing lie.

Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

And you are STUPID enough to believe the Clintons didn't help write their review?

 

[Jackson]

Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charity

Guess the rest is called OSF "Our Slush Fund."

So the donors did not get that soft, good feeling for helping others around the globe. Just what did they get?

As many times as the Daily Liar has been caught lying, how can anyone be STUPID enough to still believe the premeditated liars?????

The two foremost charity watchdog organizations Charity Navigator (97.47 out of 100 overall rating, and 97.50 out of 100 financial rating) and Charity Watch (A rating and 88% of income going to charity operations) expose this typical Right-wing lie.

Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

Charity Navigator Reports are based largely on self-reported data. Clinton Foundation make themselves look like gold.........then so does Charity Navigator

Yes, now that your allegations been proven totally false, time to discredit the sources.

What about Charity Watch, the IRS, the African nation's where the Clintons do their work? The nation's who donate to the work of the Foundation? Or the people who have been given a chance to live and thrive because of the work the Clintons are doing?

You right wingers allow yourselves to be lied to over and over by the Republican Party and still you don't fact check. The alt-right relies on your wilful ignorance and refusal to inform yourself.

You right wingers allow yourselves to be lied to over and over by the Republican Party ???? Pot calling the kettle black???? LOL

 

[Dragonlady]

Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charity

Guess the rest is called OSF "Our Slush Fund."

So the donors did not get that soft, good feeling for helping others around the globe. Just what did they get?

As many times as the Daily Liar has been caught lying, how can anyone be STUPID enough to still believe the premeditated liars?????

The two foremost charity watchdog organizations Charity Navigator (97.47 out of 100 overall rating, and 97.50 out of 100 financial rating) and Charity Watch (A rating and 88% of income going to charity operations) expose this typical Right-wing lie.

Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

And you are STUPID enough to believe the Clintons didn't help write their review?

Are you stupid enough to think they did? What part of "independent" oversight of charities do you not understand?

Again, these sources were the cat's ass with you alt-right types BEFORE they gave the Clinton Foundation top marks for their charitable work, but now that they have reviewed the Foundation thoroughly and found their work to be exemplary, they are no longer a creditable source.

The only time you believe independent sources is when they agree with your preconceived notions.

 

[edthecynic]

The Federalist
Clinton Foundation Spent Millions More On Travel Than Charitable ...
Daily Caller-7 hours ago
The Clinton Foundation spent significantly more money on travel costs than it did on charitable grants in 2014, the organization's tax filings ...
Clinton Foundation Spent Less Than 6 Percent On Charitable ...
The Federalist-Sep 16, 2016

Why the Clinton Foundation is One, Gigantic Scam
PJ Media-15 hours ago
View all


The Clinton Foundation: Hopelessly Corrupt Or Just A Lousy Charity?
Investor's Business Daily-Aug 23, 2016
The Associated Press reports that "more than half the people ... What they don't say is most of this money pays for salaries, travel expenses and meetings. In 2014, for example, the Clinton Foundation spent $12.3 million ...
The Question No One's Asking About the Clinton Foundation
Mother Jones-Aug 24, 2016

Hell-bound for Criticizing the Clintons?
Commentary Magazine-Aug 24, 2016

Clinton defends family foundation, says work will continue
Gazettextra-Aug 26, 2016
View all


What do the Clinton charities actually do and where does their ...
Raw Story-Sep 15, 2016
First up is the Clinton Family Foundation, which was set up in 2001 as ... mostnotable activities – and where much of its money is spent – are ... In 2014, theClinton Foundation had expenses of $250 million, which puts it smaller than ... The Clinton Foundation is no exception, with labor, meetings and travel ...
The Clinton charities: what they do and where the money goes
The National Business Review-11 hours ago
View all

View attachment 90015
Clinton Foundation - Protecting On-Going Charitable Activities?
Townhall-Aug 26, 2016
Clinton Foundation assets: The more than one hundred million dollars of .... Perhaps, Mr. Adler, might you be able to spend a little time to find out how ... and getting outrageous travel expenses paid for you by the foundation.
View attachment 90016
Watchdogs: Clinton Foundation Can't Be Biz as Usual in Hillary ...
Newsmax-Aug 26, 2016
"As long as the Clinton Foundation is tied to the family … very wealthy people ... No more real, no more serious than when she was SoS. ... What they don't say ismost of this money pays for salaries, travel expenses and meetings. In 2014, theClinton Foundation spent $12.3 million holding "conferences, ...
View attachment 90017
What has the Clinton Foundation actually done besides enrich itself?
Baltimore Sun-Aug 25, 2016
The foundation spent only 15 percent of the money it raised on charitableprograms. ... More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. ... for legitimatecharitable endeavors rather than, for example, the Clinton presidential ...
View attachment 90019
Ragin' Cajun: Carville Says If You Go Against The Clinton ...
Townhall-Aug 26, 2016
The Associated Press reported that more than half of the ... I'll just say that's B.S. The fact is if it's a great charity and its a five-star rated charity, guess .... the rest isspent on Clinton Foundation 'expenses' ... like private jet travel, ...
View attachment 90018
Bill Clinton aides used tax dollars to subsidize foundation, private ...
Politico-Sep 1, 2016
Bill Clinton's staff used a decades-old federal government program, originally created to keep former presidents out of the poorhouse, ...
Bill Clinton used taxpayer money for Foundation, email server
New York Daily News-Sep 1, 2016
View all

View attachment 90020
The Theatre of Good Works: A Look at the Clinton Foundation's ...
Independent Women's Forum (blog)-Sep 2, 2016
First, the Clinton Foundation is a strange type of “charity” to begin with. The New York Times has described the Foundation as “more a nonprofit global consulting firmthan a traditional ... The Foundation spends $8 million in annual travel expenses(the Clintons ... You spend more money to get more access.
View attachment 90021
Look to the Netherlands for Clinton Foundation's ongoing source of ...
Canada Free Press-Aug 28, 2016
This fact check shows that the Clinton Foundation spent nearly 81% of its donations to organization costs, travel costs, trainings and salaries. No more than19% actually reached the designated charities.” Hillary Clinton's ...

Proof that the Right ALWAYS lie in packs.
Thank you.

from sources across the country and even outside the US?

There is no denying that Right-wing lying scum are all over the globe, but that does not make them any less lying scum.

 

[aris2chat]

corruption, pay for play...............

Selling ambassadorships for donations? Some for personal gain, other for the ability to misuse and abuse the protection of diplomatic pouches and passports

We have had Ambassadors who gave their lives like Maloy, Davis, Noel, Stevens, etc. Going and working where they would best serve the US, not for their own selfish benefit or ambitions.

but Clinton is on the up and up?

 

[edthecynic]

Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charity

Guess the rest is called OSF "Our Slush Fund."

So the donors did not get that soft, good feeling for helping others around the globe. Just what did they get?

As many times as the Daily Liar has been caught lying, how can anyone be STUPID enough to still believe the premeditated liars?????

The two foremost charity watchdog organizations Charity Navigator (97.47 out of 100 overall rating, and 97.50 out of 100 financial rating) and Charity Watch (A rating and 88% of income going to charity operations) expose this typical Right-wing lie.

Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

And you are STUPID enough to believe the Clintons didn't help write their review?

From the Charity Navigator link:
"This rating was published 09/01/2016 using data provided by the charity on a consolidated pro forma 990 which was verified against 990s received from the IRS."

From the Charity Watch site:
"CharityWatch is fiercely independent. We do not charge the charities we review to be listed in our Guide or for the right to publicize their rating, nor do we accept any advertising whatsoever on our web site or in our publication. Our board of directors does not include any heads of nonprofit associations who receive their pay from the groups they are watching. Because over 95% of our support comes from small, individual donations, we have the freedom to speak openly and to be critical of the unethical practices of charities, without concern for special interests cutting our funding.

CharityWatch uses reliable information and treats charities consistently and fairly. The self-reported information charities provide in their tax forms or solicitation materials may not be the most useful source of information for donors. Unlike some raters that rely on the tax form alone, CharityWatch reviews a charity's tax form in conjunction with its more reliable audited financial statements, which are produced by independent, Certified Public Accountants outside of the charity. Audits often include information that a charity chooses to not report about itself in its tax form."

 

[aris2chat]

Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charity

Guess the rest is called OSF "Our Slush Fund."

So the donors did not get that soft, good feeling for helping others around the globe. Just what did they get?

As many times as the Daily Liar has been caught lying, how can anyone be STUPID enough to still believe the premeditated liars?????

The two foremost charity watchdog organizations Charity Navigator (97.47 out of 100 overall rating, and 97.50 out of 100 financial rating) and Charity Watch (A rating and 88% of income going to charity operations) expose this typical Right-wing lie.

Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

And you are STUPID enough to believe the Clintons didn't help write their review?

From the Charity Navigator link:
"This rating was published 09/01/2016 using data provided by the charity on a consolidated pro forma 990 which was verified against 990s received from the IRS."

From the Charity Watch site:
"CharityWatch is fiercely independent. We do not charge the charities we review to be listed in our Guide or for the right to publicize their rating, nor do we accept any advertising whatsoever on our web site or in our publication. Our board of directors does not include any heads of nonprofit associations who receive their pay from the groups they are watching. Because over 95% of our support comes from small, individual donations, we have the freedom to speak openly and to be critical of the unethical practices of charities, without concern for special interests cutting our funding.

CharityWatch uses reliable information and treats charities consistently and fairly. The self-reported information charities provide in their tax forms or solicitation materials may not be the most useful source of information for donors. Unlike some raters that rely on the tax form alone, CharityWatch reviews a charity's tax form in conjunction with its more reliable audited financial statements, which are produced by independent, Certified Public Accountants outside of the charity. Audits often include information that a charity chooses to not report about itself in its tax form."

so for year they were not on the up and up but because Hillary is running for president, now they get a whitewash?

 

[Jroc]

Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charity

Guess the rest is called OSF "Our Slush Fund."

So the donors did not get that soft, good feeling for helping others around the globe. Just what did they get?

As many times as the Daily Liar has been caught lying, how can anyone be STUPID enough to still believe the premeditated liars?????

The two foremost charity watchdog organizations Charity Navigator (97.47 out of 100 overall rating, and 97.50 out of 100 financial rating) and Charity Watch (A rating and 88% of income going to charity operations) expose this typical Right-wing lie.

Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

And you are STUPID enough to believe the Clintons didn't help write their review?

From the Charity Navigator link:
"This rating was published 09/01/2016 using data provided by the charity on a consolidated pro forma 990 which was verified against 990s received from the IRS."

From the Charity Watch site:
"CharityWatch is fiercely independent. We do not charge the charities we review to be listed in our Guide or for the right to publicize their rating, nor do we accept any advertising whatsoever on our web site or in our publication. Our board of directors does not include any heads of nonprofit associations who receive their pay from the groups they are watching. Because over 95% of our support comes from small, individual donations, we have the freedom to speak openly and to be critical of the unethical practices of charities, without concern for special interests cutting our funding.

CharityWatch uses reliable information and treats charities consistently and fairly. The self-reported information charities provide in their tax forms or solicitation materials may not be the most useful source of information for donors. Unlike some raters that rely on the tax form alone, CharityWatch reviews a charity's tax form in conjunction with its more reliable audited financial statements, which are produced by independent, Certified Public Accountants outside of the charity. Audits often include information that a charity chooses to not report about itself in its tax form."

so for year they were not on the up and up but because Hillary is running for president, now they get a whitewash?

Word got out that the Clinton foundation was a slush fund...this year they changed it up a bit, although they are sill a slush fund. Leftist love elitist corruption, as long as it's leftist who do it

 

[HenryBHough]

5.7?

5.7%?

Who'd have guessed that much!

 

[FA_Q2]

The Federalist
Clinton Foundation Spent Millions More On Travel Than Charitable ...
Daily Caller-7 hours ago
The Clinton Foundation spent significantly more money on travel costs than it did on charitable grants in 2014, the organization's tax filings ...
Clinton Foundation Spent Less Than 6 Percent On Charitable ...
The Federalist-Sep 16, 2016

Why the Clinton Foundation is One, Gigantic Scam
PJ Media-15 hours ago
View all


The Clinton Foundation: Hopelessly Corrupt Or Just A Lousy Charity?
Investor's Business Daily-Aug 23, 2016
The Associated Press reports that "more than half the people ... What they don't say is most of this money pays for salaries, travel expenses and meetings. In 2014, for example, the Clinton Foundation spent $12.3 million ...
The Question No One's Asking About the Clinton Foundation
Mother Jones-Aug 24, 2016

Hell-bound for Criticizing the Clintons?
Commentary Magazine-Aug 24, 2016

Clinton defends family foundation, says work will continue
Gazettextra-Aug 26, 2016
View all


What do the Clinton charities actually do and where does their ...
Raw Story-Sep 15, 2016
First up is the Clinton Family Foundation, which was set up in 2001 as ... mostnotable activities – and where much of its money is spent – are ... In 2014, theClinton Foundation had expenses of $250 million, which puts it smaller than ... The Clinton Foundation is no exception, with labor, meetings and travel ...
The Clinton charities: what they do and where the money goes
The National Business Review-11 hours ago
View all

View attachment 90015
Clinton Foundation - Protecting On-Going Charitable Activities?
Townhall-Aug 26, 2016
Clinton Foundation assets: The more than one hundred million dollars of .... Perhaps, Mr. Adler, might you be able to spend a little time to find out how ... and getting outrageous travel expenses paid for you by the foundation.
View attachment 90016
Watchdogs: Clinton Foundation Can't Be Biz as Usual in Hillary ...
Newsmax-Aug 26, 2016
"As long as the Clinton Foundation is tied to the family … very wealthy people ... No more real, no more serious than when she was SoS. ... What they don't say ismost of this money pays for salaries, travel expenses and meetings. In 2014, theClinton Foundation spent $12.3 million holding "conferences, ...
View attachment 90017
What has the Clinton Foundation actually done besides enrich itself?
Baltimore Sun-Aug 25, 2016
The foundation spent only 15 percent of the money it raised on charitableprograms. ... More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. ... for legitimatecharitable endeavors rather than, for example, the Clinton presidential ...
View attachment 90019
Ragin' Cajun: Carville Says If You Go Against The Clinton ...
Townhall-Aug 26, 2016
The Associated Press reported that more than half of the ... I'll just say that's B.S. The fact is if it's a great charity and its a five-star rated charity, guess .... the rest isspent on Clinton Foundation 'expenses' ... like private jet travel, ...
View attachment 90018
Bill Clinton aides used tax dollars to subsidize foundation, private ...
Politico-Sep 1, 2016
Bill Clinton's staff used a decades-old federal government program, originally created to keep former presidents out of the poorhouse, ...
Bill Clinton used taxpayer money for Foundation, email server
New York Daily News-Sep 1, 2016
View all

View attachment 90020
The Theatre of Good Works: A Look at the Clinton Foundation's ...
Independent Women's Forum (blog)-Sep 2, 2016
First, the Clinton Foundation is a strange type of “charity” to begin with. The New York Times has described the Foundation as “more a nonprofit global consulting firmthan a traditional ... The Foundation spends $8 million in annual travel expenses(the Clintons ... You spend more money to get more access.
View attachment 90021
Look to the Netherlands for Clinton Foundation's ongoing source of ...
Canada Free Press-Aug 28, 2016
This fact check shows that the Clinton Foundation spent nearly 81% of its donations to organization costs, travel costs, trainings and salaries. No more than19% actually reached the designated charities.” Hillary Clinton's ...

Nothing above is accurate. It's all based on the same false premise.

And what do you think is the false premise that makes the fact that the charity spends tens of millions in travel expenses inaccurate?

 

[FA_Q2]

Does the Salvation Army do good work? How much of their money do they give to other charities?

None?

lol

The question here would be how much of their money do they spend on ferrying the execs around?

 

[Picaro]

Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charity

Guess the rest is called OSF "Our Slush Fund."

So the donors did not get that soft, good feeling for helping others around the globe. Just what did they get?

As many times as the Daily Liar has been caught lying, how can anyone be STUPID enough to still believe the premeditated liars?????

The two foremost charity watchdog organizations Charity Navigator (97.47 out of 100 overall rating, and 97.50 out of 100 financial rating) and Charity Watch (A rating and 88% of income going to charity operations) expose this typical Right-wing lie.

Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

And you are STUPID enough to believe the Clintons didn't help write their review?

They have publicaly admitted they're' working with Charity Navigator to clean up their image'. If somebody hasn't posted that already it's out there and can be looked up.

 

[HenryBHough]

What good might it do to "clean up the image" rather than clean up the practices?

 

[Picaro]

What good might it do to "clean up the image" rather than clean up the practices?

They're only concerned about image, not substance, same as their base of supporters, and the media that fawns over them. They aren't going to change what makes them so much loot, so just gloss over it and the spotlight moves somewhere else in a short time.

 

[Interpol]

The actual facts are presented in the 3rd post in this thread and yet it hasn't stopped any of the trolls and other conspiracy types from sticking with their lie. Hilarious.