500 Spies

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
125,099
60,658
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
Those adroit enough to recognize that America today operates under the aims espoused by the Communist Party shortly after WWII may wonder how this has come to pass.
A peek at the history kept hidden by those who control the education system and the media will reveal a good deal of the provenance.






1. "Expert estimates now peg the number of Americans assisting Soviet intelligence agencies during the 1930s and 1940s as exceeding five hundred.

Not one Aldrich Ames. Not two Rosenbergs. Not five “magnificent” Cambridgers. More than five hundred willing and variously able American traitors, many operating at the very highest levels of the federal government, with who knows how many more in support roles. This was a national security fiasco of a magnitude that has never, ever entered national comprehension.

[Diana] West thus concludes, in a passage [in "American Betrayal"] on which her critics have seized, that the United States government was “for all intents and purposes occupied by a small army—a small army being just what this kind of war requires.”
Red herrings by Andrew C. McCarthy - The New Criterion


2. ‘Moreover, it is obvious that a penetration so complete would have been impossible if the Communists had not been able to depend on the blindness or indifference of many of the far larger number of ordinary liberals who dominated the Roosevelt Administration.

As early as the late 1930s, even known Communists in government were often regarded by their colleagues as merely "liberals in a hurry." And during the war, of course, they could be excused as simply enthusiasts for America's doughty ally, "good old Joe." Small wonder, then, that liberals, after the onset of the Cold War with the Soviet Union in 1946, dreaded so profoundly the disclosure of the appalling degree of governmental penetration that they now began to suspect the Communists had achieved on their watch in the 1930s and the first half of the 1940s.’
http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.1375/article_detail.asp






3. The major player in the Alger Hiss saga was fellow Communist, Whitaker Chambers. In his book, "Witness," Chambers explains his disillusionment as follows. In 1938, he determined not only to break with the Communist Party, but to inform on the Party when he could. The reason was that he was informed that Stalin was making efforts to align with Hitler, in 1939, and “from any human point of view, the pact was evil.”

As Hitler marched into Poland, Chambers arranged a private meeting with Adolf Berle, President Roosevelt’s assistant Sec’y of State. Chambers detailed the Communist espionage network, naming at least two dozen Soviet spies in Roosevelt’s administration, including Alger Hiss. Berle reported this to Roosevelt, who laughed, and told Berle to go f--- himself.
Arthur Herman, "Joseph McCarthy: Reexaming the Life and Legacy of America’s Most Hated Senator," p. 60

No action was taken, and in fact, Roosevelt promoted Hiss.


a. Elizabeth Bentley identified some 150 Soviet spies working in the Roosevelt administration. Her allegations were proven once the KGB archives were opened in 1991. "Yet the consensus of several generations of American historians (backed by many journalists and other opinion leaders) routinely mocked, ridiculed, and dismissed her as a fraud and montebank."
Haynes, Klehr, and Vassiliev, " Spies: The Rise and Fall of the KGB in America," p.543-544.






Now apply an understanding of the world to the above, and realize that many members of the animal kingdom regularly mark their territory....

....put another way, in forensic science, Locard's Principle applies: " the perpetrator of a crime will bring something into the crime scene and leave with something from it,..." Locard's exchange principle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The communists who infested the Roosevelt administration left their mark in the schools, and in the media....and most certainly in the government.
 
Those adroit recognize that America does not espouse the aims of the CPUSA or the once Soviet Union.

Americans adroit enough realize a wobbly, woozy effort by a far right social conservative who makes the JBS and Opus Dei look wildly liberal.
 
I am still wondering why their is so much capitalism going on in a communist nation??? you did know that Lenin instituted both private and state run operations in manufacturing, but after his death Stalin changed that.. So which is it ? Is the US govt. run by Leninist or Stalinist Soviet systems?
 
Those adroit recognize that America does not espouse the aims of the CPUSA or the once Soviet Union.

Americans adroit enough realize a wobbly, woozy effort by a far right social conservative who makes the JBS and Opus Dei look wildly liberal.



Time for your daily education.....so, let's prove what I said.


......it is ...extraordinary.....the amazing correspondence between the aims of the communist party and the aims of the Democrats.....



1. "Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.

3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.




4. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.




7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."




9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."






10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man." Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce."

Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders....those currently ruling in America?

That's today.

I don't believe that the folks who fought in WWII, "the Greatest Generation," would have subscribed to the above.




I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals




BTW....I'm not at all surprised that you did not recognize the truth.
You are hardly ever included under the appellation "adroit."
 
I am still wondering why their is so much capitalism going on in a communist nation??? you did know that Lenin instituted both private and state run operations in manufacturing, but after his death Stalin changed that.. So which is it ? Is the US govt. run by Leninist or Stalinist Soviet systems?



Silly boy....you can't see the forest for the trees.



In "Problems of Leninism," of which 13,774,000 copies had been printed before a new edition was brought out in 1940, Stalin affirmed Lenin's dictum that "the existence of the Soviet republic side by side with imperialist states for a long time is unthinkable. One or the other must triumph in the end. And before that end supervenes a series of frightful collisions between the Soviet republic and the bourgeois states will be inevitable."
Chesly Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution."



See the example I gave in the previous post?

Who won?
 
4. The Soviets/Stalin never gave up their plans for world domination.
Remember, while Nazism is national socialism, based on nationalism and/or race... Communism is international socialism.

And what better vehicle for international control than some sort of council of all the world's nations.....one which they could control and manipulate.


" Stalin happily accepted an invitation to associate with representatives of the so-called civilized countries on terms of equality and mutual respect in a pretended peace organization. Such an association imparted an aura of dignity and respectability to his bloody tyranny. The U.N. was a perfect mask for his murderous plans for world revolution. He had written that "the revolutionary accepts reform in order to use it as a cover for his illegal work."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 193




5. [When the American people endorsed the United Nations, they] never suspected that
the U.N. was the principal instrument of a gigantic conspiracy to control both the foreign and domestic policies of the United States, subvert the Constitution, and establish a totalitarian society.

a. [The plan was to] to control American domestic policy indirectly through the U.N.
and its specialized agencies, by means of "full employment" measures, trade concessions, and foreign aid which would necessitate excessive spending and taxing levels and gradually strangle free enterprise. Finally, the conspirators hoped to strengthen their control of American internal affairs by means of U.N. treaties, which could destroy the Bill of Rights and reduce Congress to the impotence of the German Reichstag
under Hitler or the Supreme Soviet in Communist Russia.
Manly, Op.Cit.





6. Alger Hiss, the State Department traitor, was the busiest of all the United Nations planners.... He was executive secretary of the Dumbarton Oaks conference in 1944, at which the preliminary draft of the U.N. Charter was approved, and he was secretary general of the San Francisco conference, which completed the Charter. ... As head of the Office of Special Political Affairs (later U.N. Affairs) he organized the American delegation to the San Francisco conference and the conference itself. Later he helped organize and staff the American mission to the U.N. and the secretariat of the U.N. itself.


a. A reminder of the relationship that Roosevelt had with Hiss.
"A young American diplomat was the leading force in the designing of the United Nations. He was secretary of the Dumbarten Oaks Conversations from August to October of 1944 where most of the preliminary planning for the U.N. was done.

He was Roosevelt's right-hand man in February of 1945 at Yalta where the postwar boundaries of Europe were drawn (Roosevelt was a dying man at the time. His death came only ten weeks later).


At Yalta it was agreed that the Soviet Union would have three votes (one each for Russia, Ukraine, and Byelorussia) in the U.N. General Assembly, even though the United States had only one. At Yalta much of Europe was placed under the iron heel of communist rule. At Yalta, Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin appointed this young diplomatic shining star to be the first Secretary-general of the U.N. for the founding conference held in San Francisco,April/June of 1945.


All of this seemed well and good until three years later. Alger Hiss was exposed as a communist spy...."
What The U.N. Doesn't Want You To Know
What The U.N. Doesn't Want You To Know
 
7. In the State Department, besides Hiss, there were Laurence Duggan, head of the Latin American Division; Noel Field, close friend of Duggan and a highly placed member of the West European Division, and Henry Julian Wadleigh, in the Trade Agreements Section.


Hede Massing identified Duggan and Field as members of her Soviet espionage apparatus. Duggan was killed by a fall from a window of his New York office and Field disappeared behind the Iron Curtain during the Hiss case. Wadleigh was working for a Soviet spy ring and so testified during the Hiss trials.



a. Before the war, David Weintraub had been director of the National Research Project of the WPA, which the Communists used as a convenient cover and meal ticket for their
secret operatives. (Senate Internal Security Subcommittee Report, August 24, 1953.)
Manly, Op.Cit.
 
8. The FEA (the Foreign Economic Administration was a wartime Roosevelt agency created in 1943 to consolidate several foreign economic functions) deputy administrator was Lauchlin Currie, who also was an administrative assistant to President Roosevelt.


Surprise! Currie was identified by Elizabeth Bentley as a member of a Soviet underground apparatus directed by her during the war. Frank Coe and Michael Greenberg, also identified by Miss Bentley as collaborators in the Kremlin's service, were FEAofficials.
Coe later became secretary of the International Monetary Fund, and was fired in 1953 when he refused to say under oath whether he was a Communist.




Irving Kaplan, who had been deputy to David Weintraub in the National Research Project and later went with him to the U.N., was in the FEA. Unlike Weintraub, who denied that he was Communist, Kaplan refused to testify, invoking the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. Still another FEA official was Max Lowenthal, a left-wing friend of Harry Truman who wrote a communist-line book attacking the FBI. Lowenthal denied under oath that he was a Communist. Some Communists refused, on the ground of self-incrimination, to say whether they knew Lowenthal.
Manly, Op.Cit.





9. Hiss, White, Currie, Wadleigh, Glasser, Coe and Duggan, all identified in sworn testimony by competent witnesses as Communists, are mentioned repeatedly in the State Department's book on postwar planning as members of committees and subcommittees on economic and political problems. Also frequently mentioned is Dean Acheson, then an Assistant Secretary of State. Adolf A. Berle Jr., former Assistant Secretary of State, testified before the House Committee on Un-American Activities on August 30, 1948, that Acheson headed a "pro-Russian" group in the department "with Mr. Hiss as his
principal assistant."...


Such were the credentials of the leading planners of our post-war United States foreign policy.
Manly, Op.Cit.
 
Those adroit recognize that America does not espouse the aims of the CPUSA or the once Soviet Union.

Americans adroit enough realize a wobbly, woozy effort by a far right social conservative who makes the JBS and Opus Dei look wildly liberal.

Jake can't get spanked enough on McCarthy. He's incapable of learning or changing his ways.

PC spanks him, Stanton's Evan's co-author Mark Rochelle, paid a visit to USMB to spank Starkey and today, you'd think this was Jake's first post on McCarthy.

Amazing
 
Last edited:
Joe McCarthy and the commie-hunters made the jobs of those real commie spies much easier, by deflecting all the attention on to innocent people.

PC and Frank approve, of course. To them, it's well worth it to betray the USA if it helps them attack the dirty liberals.
 
Joe McCarthy and the commie-hunters made the jobs of those real commie spies much easier, by deflecting all the attention on to innocent people.

PC and Frank approve, of course. To them, it's well worth it to betray the USA if it helps them attack the dirty liberals.

You have NOTHING.

You don't have a single innocent person you can name as being Blacklisted by "McCarthy's HUAC Red Scare"

Liberals defend Communists and betray the USA.
 
Joe McCarthy and the commie-hunters made the jobs of those real commie spies much easier, by deflecting all the attention on to innocent people.

PC and Frank approve, of course. To them, it's well worth it to betray the USA if it helps them attack the dirty liberals.





Here comes one of those rare opportunities!

After post after post in which you document your idiocy, now you will have a chance to shed the poor reputation you've earned!


"....McCarthy and the commie-hunters made the jobs of those real commie spies much easier, by deflecting all the attention on to innocent people.."


Name them.


Certainly you must have a few in mind......

.....or you will remain a lying simpleton and a sack of sewage.



Ball's in your court.
 
beware of a brown oriental that tries so pass herself off as white,very suspicious



.....so you have an inveterate hatred of brown folks?



At least learn to get your racism correct:

'oriental' is for furniture.....it's Asian.

And yellow, not brown.





And speaking of skin.....I got under yours again, didn't I.
Great.



Moron.
 
Those adroit recognize that America does not espouse the aims of the CPUSA or the once Soviet Union.

Americans adroit enough realize a wobbly, woozy effort by a far right social conservative who makes the JBS and Opus Dei look wildly liberal.

Jake can't get spanked enough on McCarthy. He's incapable of learning or changing his ways.

PC spanks him, Stanton's Evan's co-author Mark Rochelle, paid a visit to USMB to spank Starkey and today, you'd think this was Jake's first post on McCarthy.

Amazing

Rochelle ran away crying, rightfully so, after we got done with him.

The far right in this country has always been considered cranky crazies.

Tis what tis.
 
You almost gotta laugh at the bi-polar left. On one hand they manage to defend the incredible negligence of the FDR administration and when "give 'em hell" Harry Truman decided to address the communist influence in society and government the lefties managed to defend both communism and Harry Truman and blame the whole thing on a republican senator. How many spies did the US have in the 30's through WW2? The short answer is freaking none. The Brits were horrified at the the lack of "intelligence" in the mess of the FDR administration years. The Supreme Court had to finally weigh in on the situation and appoint Hoover's FBI as the lead espionage agency but the FBI wasn't equipped to do the job. Hard charging Wild Bill Donovan did the best he could but the entire intelligence network was an incoherent mess.
 
You almost gotta laugh at the bi-polar left. On one hand they manage to defend the incredible negligence of the FDR administration and when "give 'em hell" Harry Truman decided to address the communist influence in society and government the lefties managed to defend both communism and Harry Truman and blame the whole thing on a republican senator. How many spies did the US have in the 30's through WW2? The short answer is freaking none. The Brits were horrified at the the lack of "intelligence" in the mess of the FDR administration years. The Supreme Court had to finally weigh in on the situation and appoint Hoover's FBI as the lead espionage agency but the FBI wasn't equipped to do the job. Hard charging Wild Bill Donovan did the best he could but the entire intelligence network was an incoherent mess.






The Democrats/Liberals/Progressives do their very best to weaken this nation.

After Viet Nam, Democrat Church and Pike committees put a stake through the heart of our intelligence community.




1. "[Demorat] Senator Frank Church and his allies claimed that an assertive legislative role would bring the United States “back to the genius of the Founding Fathers.” This assertion was made despite the fact that American presidents from 1789 to 1974 were given wide latitude to conduct clandestine operations they believed were in the national interest.

President Washington, in his first annual message to Congress in 1790, requested a Contingency Fund, or “secret service” fund, as one member of Congress described it. Washington was given this fund, in the amount of $40,000, a sizable sum in the early 1790s. The president was not required to report how he spent this money, he merely had to divulge the amount of money spent, without revealing to whom or for what reasons it had been spent.

Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Andrew Jackson, and Abraham Lincoln, all authorized clandestine operations out of this fund, and did not report the details to Congress. This pattern persisted until the mid-1970s with little or no change, other than the increasing size and bureaucratization of the nation’s intelligence apparatus in the twentieth century."
History News Network | Congressional Oversight and the Crippling of the CIA




Many believe these efforts by the Democrats led to 9/11.







2." Here at home, the Obama administration has gravely impaired our capability to gather human intelligence by declassifying hundreds of pages of documents that explain our interrogation techniques—information that is now probably in al-Qaeda training manuals." https://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=2009&month=10
 
10. The No. 1 Communist in the Treasury Department was Harry D. White, who became Assistant Secretary. Both White and Harold Glasser, another Treasury Department official, were members of Miss Bentley's Kremlin service and both were busily engaged in postwar planning. Another Communist in the Treasury Department was Kaplan, who came over from the FEA.



The closest we have to an explanation of Roosevelt's acquiescence to Soviet plans and desires is the following:

" Roosevelt also was obsessed by the delusion that he could enchant and bribe Stalin to cooperate for peace. Stalin, eager to be bribed, professed to be enchanted. On returning from Tehran Roosevelt was almost delirious with self-satisfaction as he told Miss Perkins how he charmed Stalin, how "the ice was broken and we talked like men and brothers."
Manly, Op.Cit., p.192




Franklin Roosevelt was completely duped, controlled, led, by Joseph Stalin and his cadre of spies.

To a great degree, the above is the reason we live under the direction that communism has insinuated into our society.
 

Forum List

Back
Top