7000-1. Guess Who Won

[Staidhup]

So Salem is now an HOA? The next thing they will demand is that you will need a permit to paint your building furthermore be restricted as to color choice. How a man or woman chooses to honor their beliefs and in this case patriotism is their choice. My guess if it was a BLM mural it would be acceptable? Oregon is a mess. No wonder the eastern and southern parts want out.

 

[Staidhup]

I suspect that if the house next to mine painted a giant piece of "artwork" depicting this I would be happy for such rules.

View attachment 583044

Who gave you the right to judge and dictate what a person should or wish to do with their private property? Who the hell do you think you are?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Who gave you the right to judge and dictate what a person should or wish to do with their private property? Who the hell do you think you are?

I think I am me and I do not want my property value decreased by some moron like you.

That is why cites have zoning laws and such.

 

[colfax_m]

So you have no problem with the law allowing slavery, right? After all, the law is the law.

You redefine the word moron.

This is a really stupid argument.

 

[Staidhup]

I think I am me and I do not want my property value decreased by some moron like you.

That is why cites have zoning laws and such.

Zoning laws are a long ways away from dictating what a person chooses to do with the edifice of a structure on his property. You freaking elitist morons don’t respect anyone but your country club buds.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Zoning laws are a long ways away from dictating what a person chooses to do with the edifice of a structure on his property. You freaking elitist morons don’t respect anyone but your country club buds.

A man has to have standards!

 

[Staidhup]

A man has to have standards!

I understand your country club standards all too well, it’s all about me me me. So sad.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I understand your country club standards all too well, it’s all about me me me. So sad.

It is the American way! Why do you hate America?

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

I have to wonder if that is what they had put on their business how many of you would be on here defending their right to do so....I suspect the number would be ZERO

But I'm sure you would.

 

[Catman51]

This is a really stupid argument.

The one you keep attempting? Yes it is and you are.

 

[Catman51]

It is the American way! Why do you hate America?

No fool. The American way is equality for all, not just a few who think that they are entitled to decide everything for everyone.

 

[Catman51]

A man has to have standards!

Let us know when you get some and they equate to societies standards of what all, not just precious little you, want.

 

[colfax_m]

It's not their speech, it's the candidates, and twitter is giving it to him/her for free while banning their opponent.

Sounds like a contribution to me.

For starters, you're contradicting yourself. You simultaneously say that Twitter is giving them speech but that it's not their speech. If it's not their speech, how could they give it to them?

Making expenditures in support of a candidate cannot be considered a campaign contribution.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

You don’t think people should follow the rules?

I do.

And if you don’t like them, get them changed. Right?

Unless of course the rules of elections . Or the rules where you can't spy on a presidential administration. Then rules don't matter. But a fucking painting . Woe rules.

 

[colfax_m]

Unless of course the rules of elections . Or the rules where you can't spy on a presidential administration. Then rules don't matter. But a fucking painting . Woe rules.

If someone broke the rules, they should be corrected.

But they have to actually break the rules. It doesn't count if it only happened in your little imagination.

 

[Catman51]

Twitter is on private property too but y’all keep saying it’s public.

Idiot, twitter is on public airways and public views. You are to stupid to even know this.

 

[martybegan]

For starters, you're contradicting yourself. You simultaneously say that Twitter is giving them speech but that it's not their speech. If it's not their speech, how could they give it to them?

Making expenditures in support of a candidate cannot be considered a campaign contribution.

If it bans one side and allows the other, it's promoting that side. In our electoral system that's pretty much endorsing and advertising only one side.

And I suggest you check campaign finance laws before you make a statement like that.

 

[Catman51]

Holy fucking shit. You just spent the whole morning calling me names and then you post this?

View attachment 583150

Oh, and it is insight, not incite. Fuck you are stupid.

No, you fucking idiot. You are trying to start something or incite it. You are only providing "insight" or a view into how stupid you truly are. Take an english class prior to trying to correct what others are saying. You continue to make a fool of yourself.

 

[colfax_m]

If it bans one side and allows the other, it's promoting that side. In our electoral system that's pretty much endorsing and advertising only one side.

And I suggest you check campaign finance laws before you make a statement like that.

Wait, you're telling me you think it's illegal to favor Democrats?

You would make a good little fascist. You now want to make it illegal to not support Republicans.

Endorsing one side isn't a campaign finance contribution.

 

[Catman51]

For starters, you're contradicting yourself. You simultaneously say that Twitter is giving them speech but that it's not their speech. If it's not their speech, how could they give it to them?

Making expenditures in support of a candidate cannot be considered a campaign contribution.

Time for the moron to buy a dictionary to read the true meanings of the words he attacks.