toomuchtime_
Gold Member
- Dec 29, 2008
- 20,088
- 4,995
- 280
You can't know what a tax break costs until you know how much the loss of these jobs and the added cost of social services would cost.he said "up to 1100". The 730 plus more new hires and the people who will be employed to upgrade and expand the factory.
As usual our lib members never tell the whole story.
LMAO!
"How old are you?"
"Up to 1,000 years old."
You. Are. Dumb.
when the exact number is yet to be determined but you know the maximum, using the phrase "up to" is grammatically correct.
You, Are. Dumb.
Grammatically correct? What the fuck does that have to do with grammar?
It's not correct. In zero ways, shapes, or forms, is "1,100" correct. Period. He saved 500 jobs, and it cost the Indiana taxpayers $7 million to do it.
"Who's making these deals?" - Donald Trump. (YOU are, dumbshit).
1100 could be correct, no one yet knows. Sorry if you are too dumb to understand that simple statement.
Giving a tax credit to a company does not "cost" the taxpayers anything. Those jobs will pay taxes to the state, and since they are working they will not cost the state unemployment payments, welfare, or food stamps. Its a net gain for the state treasury. That's why all states give tax incentives to companies to locate or stay in their state.
I get it that you hate Trump and will rant like a scalded ass ape about everything he does, But when you show your complete lack of knowledge on a topic like this it only confirms that you are an ignorant liberal asshole.
lol @ 1100 could be correct. No, it's not, will not, and never was, correct.
A tax break doesn't "cost" anything? The company enriches itself thanks to the society paid for by the taxpayers of Indiana, and yet doesn't have to pay for it? And that costs nothing? But sure, let the $40k-per-year working stiffs cover it while the CEOs skate.
He's really fighting for the little guy, huh?