91 Felonies

[Hellbilly]

First of all you started it and second of all I don't want you dead. I want you to fuck off but I don't want you to die.

You’ll get neither
You support those that do

 

[rightwinger]

No way.
Billions got sent back and forth in 2014 over the Maidan coup.
Hunter obviously was just the bagman.
Like with Clarence Thomas, it is easy to hide bribes and kickbacks.
Instead of depositing sums of money, you buy them the luxuries they want and there is no record of it.
In Biden's case, they bought him the presidency, which he did not earn and does not deserve.
He is the evil behind the 1994 federal crime bill for the War on Drugs, sentence mandates, asset forfeiture, etc.

Fantasy

I wasn’t addressing how long you leftards have been making bullshit claims.

The subject was the utter lack of any actual credible meaningful relevant or material evidence after all this time.

WE have enough evidence against Trump for four indictments, 91 Felony charges
YOU have nothing against Biden

Looks like you lose again Skippy

 

[StoneCold]

It means that the commies gotta die.

Do you want aid to Ukraine stopped?
Or just kill your self-described "domestic" commies?

 

[Road Runner]

Do you want aid to Ukraine stopped?

Yes as we need to worry about this country first, but this topic isn't about Ukraine either.

 

[Lastamender]

‘Guilty’ Witnesses Don’t Need to Testify​

Some might think that the prosecutors could present the fact that these defendants plead guilty to the jury at later trials as proof of the guilt of defendants who go to trial. However, Supreme Court precedent forbids the direct use of the guilty pleas of witnesses to prove that other defendants who go to trial are also guilty. The prosecutors will not tell the jury something like, “Ms. Ellis plead guilty to helping Mr. Guiliani make a false statement and that is evidence that he did make a false statement.” Nor can prosecutors simply introduce the fact of the guilty pleas or documents about the guilty pleas as exhibits in the trials of other defendants.


These practices violate the rights of the defendants going to trial to confront their accusers under the 5th Amendment, but they also do not constitute relevant evidence of the guilt of the person on trial. The fact that one person agrees that their conduct is illegal in a plea deal doesn’t prove that another person is guilty, even in conspiracy or aiding and abetting scenarios, and thus the courts don’t permit prosecutors to prove their cases this way.


So, in short, there is no legal reason for Willis to have entered into these kinds of super-sweet pleas with these defendants in this case. But she did so. And the reason Willis did so is that in practical reality, if/when Trump or Guiliani or Eastman come to trial in this case, she will do covertly what the law doesn’t permit her to do overtly.

Georgia DA Offers 'Nothingburger' Plea Deals To Build Parade Of 'Guilty' Witnesses

There is no legitimate prosecutorial reason for Fani Willis to have struck these particular plea deals. They're a means to an end.

thefederalist.com

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Show us

If you have to ask you're to fucking stupid to accept the evidence

 

[StoneCold]

Yes as we need to worry about this country first, but this topic isn't about Ukraine either.

I'm just asking about the commies you want dead. Thanks for the confirmation that you don't care about the real commies. Just the commies in your head.

 

[Hellbilly]

If you have to ask you're to fucking stupid to accept the evidence

Translation- you got nothing

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Translation- you got nothing

Not what the evidence has shown

 

[Hellbilly]

Not what the evidence has shown

There is no evidence and you know it

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"The KKK was not the least bit interested in Black people at the time. At all. They were no threat to southern dimocrap scum in any way, shape or form." ....

Youre one confused bulldyke

 

[bigrebnc1775]

There is no evidence and you know it

Tell that to those who have collected the evidence

 

[BackAgain]

Fantasy

WE have enough evidence against Trump for four indictments, 91 Felony charges
YOU have nothing against Biden

You don’t have any evidence at all against Trump. None required when you scumbags are engaged in only political persecution as you are.

Plus, ignorant lumps of dogshit like you don’t know what evidence is already available against Potato.

Looks like you lose again Skippy

Wrong. But — if looks like you’re dead wrong again, Leftwhiner. As always.

 

[Hellbilly]

Tell that to those who have collected the evidence

Who might that be? Donald duck? Flipper?
You jagaloons have been threatening impeachment since before Biden took office.
Put up or shut up

 

[StoneCold]

Translation- you got nothing

He never does.

 

[rightwinger]

You don’t have any evidence at all against Trump.

Thousands of pages of evidence against Trump. Eyewitness testimony from Trump staff. Trumps own stupid admissions.

You still don’t have anything against Joe Biden

Looks like you lose again Skippy

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Oh please, you take orders from a guy who has to be told what state he's in.

And your guy lives in a world that does not exist.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

He never does.

You ling shit like a girl

 

[bodecea]

If you have to ask you're to fucking stupid to accept the evidence

"to fucking stupid".........................

 

[bodecea]

Not what the evidence has shown

And what evidence is that?