A Civil Right?

[NYcarbineer]

Trayvon Martin also had the right not to go home, and he also had the right to stand HIS ground,

against the threat of George Zimmerman.

being followed in a car and then on foot by a strange man at night and in the rain, can be intimidating and scary.

so yes, Martin did have the right to Stand His Ground against this strange man who was following him.

No.. he did not.. he had 4 minutes to just walk away.. yet HE came back and STARTED the altercation.. HE HAD NO RIGHT TO STAND HIS GROUND

It's hilarious how much the rightwing racists loved the stand your ground law,

until one applies it to an unarmed black man.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Trayvon Martin also had the right not to go home, and he also had the right to stand HIS ground,

against the threat of George Zimmerman.

You are trolling now. So standing your ground means beating the daylights out of someone? In what universe? So Martin had the right to beat Zimmerman to a pulp?

In the universe where Zimmerman instigated in the incident.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I like how the rightwing racists have translated the lack of evidence as to who started the fight into...

...that is proof Trayon did and Zimmerman didn't.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I like how the rightwing racists have translated the lack of evidence as to who started the fight into...

...that is proof Trayon did and Zimmerman didn't.

The evidence was enough to convince a Jury that not only didn't Zimmerman murder Martin he did not commit manslaughter. The evidence is that martin was either home or almost home as stated by his girlfriend. The evidence is that Zimmerman quit following martin when advised he did not need to do that. The evidence is that Martin broke Zimmerman's nose knocked him to the ground and was pounding his head into the ground. There is NO evidence that Zimmerman ever hit Martin.

Zimmerman passed 2 Lie detector tests and was visible relieved when told there was video evidence of the fight.

What have you got?

 

[DiamondDave]

being followed in a car and then on foot by a strange man at night and in the rain, can be intimidating and scary.

so yes, Martin did have the right to Stand His Ground against this strange man who was following him.

No.. he did not.. he had 4 minutes to just walk away.. yet HE came back and STARTED the altercation.. HE HAD NO RIGHT TO STAND HIS GROUND

It's hilarious how much the rightwing racists loved the stand your ground law,

until one applies it to an unarmed black man.

Idiot.. stand your ground does not apply to the aggressor

Again.. no evidence whatsoever that GZ struck at all, let alone first....

 

[DiamondDave]

Trayvon Martin also had the right not to go home, and he also had the right to stand HIS ground,

against the threat of George Zimmerman.

You are trolling now. So standing your ground means beating the daylights out of someone? In what universe? So Martin had the right to beat Zimmerman to a pulp?

In the universe where Zimmerman instigated in the incident.

In the universe where there is ZERO evidence of that... and all kinds of evidence that TM was the only one who struck, hence struck first

 

[DiamondDave]

There is no proof that Martin attacked Zimmerman.

There is not enough evidence to dispute that Zimmerman was losing the fight when he shot Martin. That is it. There is no evidence either way regarding who started the fight.

Stop saying that you know who started the fight.

Person A person has injuries from receiving a physical attack
Person B has marks as a result of inflicting damage in a physical attack
Person A has no marks showing resulting from giving out physical abuse in an attack
Person B has no marks or injuries resulting from receiving any physical attack

Who the FUCK do you think started the physical altercation??

I don't know. And neither do you. Period.

So the one with no injuries associated with striking someone and injuries that are associated with being struck by someone is the one who you think could have or did strike first

You sir, are an idiot

 

[DiamondDave]

There is no proof that Martin attacked Zimmerman.

There is not enough evidence to dispute that Zimmerman was losing the fight when he shot Martin. That is it. There is no evidence either way regarding who started the fight.

Stop saying that you know who started the fight.

Other than the Coup de Grace, what evidence is there that Zimmerman threw the first punch?

There is none. As the is none that Martin did. We don't know.

And....starting a fight does not always mean throwing a punch. Reality.....not TV.

So legal actions such as following in public would be starting a fight?? I know.. SAYING something must have been starting the fight..... I know... LETTING HIM GO was starting the fight!!!!


But throwing a punch, breaking a nose, and straddling and pummeling is not starting a fight

 

[dilloduck]

TM lost the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, because Zimmerman didn't break off the pursuit as advised. He had no real business doing what he was doing, once he'd informed the police of his suspicions.

Horseshit---are you comfortable with your lies ? He had every CIVIL RIGHT to do what he was doing. Are liberals the fricken gestapo now ?

 

[FireFly]

Black thug shot white baby in the face!

 

[gallantwarrior]

I guess Trayvon Martin fucking violated his own fucking goddamn civil right when after the 4 minute window he had to just leave and go home, he fucking went fucking back and fucking started a fucking altercation which lead to his fucking death at the hand of another who had to fucking defend himself against fucking Trayvon Martin

You're a fucking asshole. The bottom line is if Zimmerman had gone like he was told, none of this would have happened.

And you know this how?

 

[Lakhota]

Black thug shot white baby in the face!

George Zimmerman's brother tweets picture comparing Trayvon Martin to teen accused of shooting baby and warns about the 'dangers of black teens' | Mail Online

 

[LoneLaugher]

Black thug shot white baby in the face!

I heard that kid refused to sleep at night, was resisting being potty trained and would not stop sticking his finger in light sockets. He surely would have grown up to be a thug. He got what he deserved.

 

[Noomi]

"Trayvon Martin had the civil right to go home" Al Sharpton said in front of the Department of Justice today.

If that were true, why didn't he take the last four minutes of his life to go home? What does this have to do with civil rights?

Because he was being followed by a strange person, was concerned for his safety, and he had every right to demand why the hell some stranger was stalking him.

 

[Care4all]

TM lost the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, because Zimmerman didn't break off the pursuit as advised. He had no real business doing what he was doing, once he'd informed the police of his suspicions.

Horseshit---are you comfortable with your lies ? He had every CIVIL RIGHT to do what he was doing. Are liberals the fricken gestapo now ?

So, Trayvon according to you and others was suppose to 'Retreat, and run home if he wanted Safety" but George was not? Who's the real gestapo? you all? Or the 'liberals'?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Absolutely. Treyvon Martin, upon observing a strange man watching him from his car, was obligated to run home. Once he made that evil decision to not run, he sealed hi own fate.

 

[DiamondDave]

"Trayvon Martin had the civil right to go home" Al Sharpton said in front of the Department of Justice today.

If that were true, why didn't he take the last four minutes of his life to go home? What does this have to do with civil rights?

Because he was being followed by a strange person, was concerned for his safety, and he had every right to demand why the hell some stranger was stalking him.

Not illegal to follow... not illegal to look strange to someone (unless you want to go that route and look at all the leftist freaks we can lock up)... and there is no right to demand anything

But hey.. when lying is your niche, you gotta stick with it I bet

 

[NYcarbineer]

Person A person has injuries from receiving a physical attack
Person B has marks as a result of inflicting damage in a physical attack
Person A has no marks showing resulting from giving out physical abuse in an attack
Person B has no marks or injuries resulting from receiving any physical attack

Who the FUCK do you think started the physical altercation??

I don't know. And neither do you. Period.

So the one with no injuries associated with striking someone and injuries that are associated with being struck by someone is the one who you think could have or did strike first

You sir, are an idiot

Trayvon Martin had a fatal injury associated with being struck by a bullet.

 

[Katzndogz]

Did Trayvon Martin have a license to beat up whoever he wanted to? That's the real question. Trayvon Martin being black, had an absolute right to beat up anyone he wanted to. There should be no right whatsoever to fight back against an assailant if the assailant is black.

 

[DiamondDave]

I don't know. And neither do you. Period.

So the one with no injuries associated with striking someone and injuries that are associated with being struck by someone is the one who you think could have or did strike first

You sir, are an idiot

Trayvon Martin had a fatal injury associated with being struck by a bullet.

You know damn well the issue is the physical altercation...

if the bullet strike were first, there would have been no physical strikes by TM... the only strike proven to be by GZ was the bullet strike..

TM STRUCK FIRST