A climate scientist admits researching facts takes to much time and not relevant

[Wyatt earp]

What else is new with the left they can't be bothered with facts, or research


During the interview, Rogan asked his guest if he had ever "debated anyone" over climate change. Dessler stated he did debate a climate skeptic, scientist Richard Lindzen over a decade ago, but it was "terrible" and he vowed he would never do it again.


*snip*



But Dessler claimed it would be too burdensome and time-consuming to "fact-check" someone who disagreed with him




Climate scientist tells Joe Rogan he refuses to debate dissenters on climate change | Fox News
Climate scientist tells Joe Rogan he refuses to debate dissenters on climate change

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[Sunsettommy]

That is why Andrew Dessler is a failed scientist he idiotically thinks it is settled science.

 

[daveman]

Anyone who says "the science is settled" means "SILENCE PEASANT DONT YOU DARE QUESTION YOUR BETTERS".

And it means they don't know shit about science.

 

[cnm]

But Dessler claimed it would be too burdensome and time-consuming to "fact-check" someone who disagreed with him

That's the whole point and beauty of the Gish Gallop. Bullshit can be piled high much faster than it can be cleared away.

 

[cnm]

That is why Andrew Dessler is a failed scientist he idiotically thinks it is settled science.

Until new knowledge comes along. It hasn't, so far.

 

[Batcat]

What else is new with the left they can't be bothered with facts, or research


During the interview, Rogan asked his guest if he had ever "debated anyone" over climate change. Dessler stated he did debate a climate skeptic, scientist Richard Lindzen over a decade ago, but it was "terrible" and he vowed he would never do it again.


*snip*



But Dessler claimed it would be too burdensome and time-consuming to "fact-check" someone who disagreed with him




Climate scientist tells Joe Rogan he refuses to debate dissenters on climate change | Fox News
Climate scientist tells Joe Rogan he refuses to debate dissenters on climate change

For some reason this does not surprise me in the least.

 

[cnm]

For some reason this does not surprise me in the least.

Dessler stated he did debate a climate skeptic, scientist Richard Lindzen over a decade ago, but it was "terrible" and he vowed he would never do it again.

And since that time all Lindzen's predictions have proven to be false. Just fyi.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Until new knowledge comes along. It hasn't, so far.

You miss the point, science is never settled in the real world, but is in the propaganda world because of the politics demanding it.

 

[cnm]

You miss the point, science is never settled in the real world,

A consensus is arrived at, informed by current knowledge. That endures until new knowledge is obtained. That is the way science works. The current consensus on AGW is 'settled' at the moment. Until it isn't.

 

[Colin norris]

What else is new with the left they can't be bothered with facts, or research


During the interview, Rogan asked his guest if he had ever "debated anyone" over climate change. Dessler stated he did debate a climate skeptic, scientist Richard Lindzen over a decade ago, but it was "terrible" and he vowed he would never do it again.


*snip*



But Dessler claimed it would be too burdensome and time-consuming to "fact-check" someone who disagreed with him




Climate scientist tells Joe Rogan he refuses to debate dissenters on climate change | Fox News
Climate scientist tells Joe Rogan he refuses to debate dissenters on climate change

Where's your evidence it is only the left believe in CC?
How could you ignorantly come to that statement?
There are approximately half of republicans believe it's true. Why aren't you poking shit at them your moron.

 

[Rogue AI]

Where's your evidence it is only the left believe in CC?
How could you ignorantly come to that statement?
There are approximately half of republicans believe it's true. Why aren't you poking shit at them your moron.

Nobody denies the climate changes, the debate is man's role, if any.

 

[Colin norris]

Nobody denies the climate changes, the debate is man's role, if any.

I know and that is what it's about. You really need to do some research. Why are most republicans hesitant to accept that and deny it but simultaneously believe there's a god. It makes no sense. CC can affect our very existence, God will never do that.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I know and that is what it's about. You really need to do some research. Why are most republicans hesitant to accept that and deny it but simultaneously believe there's a god. It makes no sense. CC can affect our very existence, God will never do that.

So you want us to do research but the left doesn't have to do research and make up stuff?

 

[Wyatt earp]

A consensus is arrived at, informed by current knowledge. That endures until new knowledge is obtained. That is the way science works. The current consensus on AGW is 'settled' at the moment. Until it isn't.

Their is NO consensus you couldn't get 10 scientist in a room to 100% agree with what to have for dinner

 

[Muhammed]

Until new knowledge comes along. It hasn't, so far.

You don't know jack shit about science.

This is the most contentious issue in science. And one side got flat out busted a decade ago when the climategate emails were leaked, dumbass.

You're an easily brainwashed idiot. A member of the Global Warming Doomsday Cult. You're pathetically stupid.

 

[Sunsettommy]

A consensus is arrived at, informed by current knowledge. That endures until new knowledge is obtained. That is the way science works. The current consensus on AGW is 'settled' at the moment. Until it isn't.

No, it is reproducible research that drives science not a popularity contest. Consensus is a political tool used to generate ideology for a group or party.

There have been many consensus FAILURES simply because they behaved like a political body.

 

[Rogue AI]

I know and that is what it's about. You really need to do some research. Why are most republicans hesitant to accept that and deny it but simultaneously believe there's a god. It makes no sense. CC can affect our very existence, God will never do that.

You folks need to research all the complex factors that effect climate that humans cannot effect. Distilling something as vast and complex as global climate down to CO2 is moronic on so many levels.

 

[ding]

You really need to do some research.

I about fell out of my chair reading this. Are you sure you are the best person to be saying that?

 

[daveman]

You folks need to research all the complex factors that effect climate that humans cannot effect. Distilling something as vast and complex as global climate down to CO2 is moronic on so many levels.

THE CLIMATE IS A COMPLEX SYSTEM WITH LITERALLY MILLIONS OF VARIABLES BUT YOU NEED TO PAY ATTENTION ONLY TO THE PLANT FOOD AND GIVE US MORE TAXES IF YOU DONT YOU HATE SCIENCE