A Cool, Wet Spring Ahead

[Sunsettommy]

See the graph above. It certainly didn't peter out when the AMO went negative from 1965 to 1993. The AMO is not the cause of post-industrial warming.

It was cooling from the mid 1940's to the late 1970's, your temperature chart is a lie because they went to erase the well-known cooling trend of those decades.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Lots of you are disputing the warming trend. There have been countless claims here that its all lies, a huge hoax, UHI and a dozen other harebrained fantasies.

CO2 is the highest its been in 3-fucking-million-fucking-years. That's FIFTEEN TIMES the span of human existence. That ISN'T "feeble".

The Doubling from 280 ppm to 560 ppm is generally around 3.8 W/m2 that is feeble indeed.

 

[Crick]

The Doubling from 280 ppm to 560 ppm is generally around 3.8 W/m2 that is feeble indeed.

ECS is 3C. TCR is 1.8C. Those are not feeble.

This shows a 50% increase has produced a transient response to date of 2 Wcm^-2. That has been sufficient to produce the observed warming, which may have already pushed multiple Earth climate systems (ex: AMOC) past tipping points into new semi-stable states. Calling such an event "feeble" simply shows you are ignorant or dishonest.

 

[Sunsettommy]

ECS is 3C. TCR is 2.5C. Those are not feeble.

I was basically quoting the IPCC and the ECS and TCR is much lower than that now, you are way out of date:


Gavin Schmidt doesn't agree with you,

(1.8°C transient, 3.0°C equilibrium)​

LINK


But many published papers show lower values,

LINK


Here is a long list of published papers showing low warming rate on the doubling of CO2 ppm level,

160 Papers Find Extremely Low CO2 Climate Sensitivity​

(a) Quantified Low Climate Sensitivity to Doubled CO2

LINK