- Oct 11, 2007
- 69,283
- 34,923
- Thread starter
- #161
If she has to prove that, you have to prove that limiting campaign contributions would result in better government. It never has in the past.
It is only logical that all things being equal with finances, the incumbent already has the name and face recognition and it is a lot more difficult for a newcomer to gain the attention of the public.
Name and face recognition, AND media coverage.
Exactly. They are going to cover statements and activity by those already in office which of course also increases the name and face recognition of those in office. Much less so those who are not in office.