- Thread starter
- #41
He was assassinated by con because he was going to end the Vietnam war.
Chinese fortune cookie?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was assassinated by con because he was going to end the Vietnam war.
bitch please! there are a whole bunch of historical conservatives that the gop no longer consider conservativeThat is part of what made him a great President.By the standards set by the far left today, JFK would be a Conservative and thus would not fit into todays far left party.
More like his last name and the letter behind his name is what made him a great president to many..
It is like when the far left holds FDR to almost od like status, yet the very thing he created (the military industrial complex) the far left is hell bent on dismantling and destroying!
Just on the fact that JFK wanted to cut taxes (even for the top 1%) proves he would not be accepted by today's far left party..
true! today's gop is just that!What a load of crap.
How can you idolize that philandering POS who preyed upon mentally unstable andr/or drug addicted young women? To him, they were nothing more than meat ordered from the butcher shop. Try reading about Marilyn Monroe and then tell me she wasn't screwed by him in more ways than one.
ever hear the phrases: off topic, irrelevant or non sequitur?true! today's gop is just that!What a load of crap.
Should I assume the Federal Employees includes the expanded military? That so needed to be repaired?
Should I assume the Clinton drop in Fed Employees includes the military, that of course was being downsized because of the End of the Cold War he inherited?
Indeed.He at least wasnt a rapist like Clinton.Clinton idolized JFK and that was the ONLY reason why was because of his philandering with women.Clinton took it to a whole new level though with rape.Was Monroe forced into it? Did he rape her, many times? Is JFK the only person in this world that has had an affair? Didn't Clinton play with women also? How many others are guilty of the same thing that we don't know about? I'm not a JFK lover, but I can't see singling him out when so many are guilty of having a lover. In my opinion, it's really petty to even bring it up. Aren't there bigger fish to fry than to discuss what may have happened 55 years ago between a man and a woman? This is just petty shit, nothing more.How can you idolize that philandering POS who preyed upon mentally unstable andr/or drug addicted young women? To him, they were nothing more than meat ordered from the butcher shop. Try reading about Marilyn Monroe and then tell me she wasn't screwed by him in more ways than one.
danger will Robinson ..handjob Jfk conspiracy alert !!Indeed.He at least wasnt a rapist like Clinton.Clinton idolized JFK and that was the ONLY reason why was because of his philandering with women.Clinton took it to a whole new level though with rape.Was Monroe forced into it? Did he rape her, many times? Is JFK the only person in this world that has had an affair? Didn't Clinton play with women also? How many others are guilty of the same thing that we don't know about? I'm not a JFK lover, but I can't see singling him out when so many are guilty of having a lover. In my opinion, it's really petty to even bring it up. Aren't there bigger fish to fry than to discuss what may have happened 55 years ago between a man and a woman? This is just petty shit, nothing more.How can you idolize that philandering POS who preyed upon mentally unstable andr/or drug addicted young women? To him, they were nothing more than meat ordered from the butcher shop. Try reading about Marilyn Monroe and then tell me she wasn't screwed by him in more ways than one.
two examples right there on how politicians get away with crimes everyday we go to jail for.Clintons raping of women and Ted murdering that woman and just a mere slap on the wrist for drunk driving.
ever hear the phrases: off topic, irrelevant or non sequitur?true! today's gop is just that!What a load of crap.
Should I assume the Federal Employees includes the expanded military? That so needed to be repaired?
Should I assume the Clinton drop in Fed Employees includes the military, that of course was being downsized because of the End of the Cold War he inherited?
denial of fact rears it's misshapen head!ever hear the phrases: off topic, irrelevant or non sequitur?true! today's gop is just that!What a load of crap.
Should I assume the Federal Employees includes the expanded military? That so needed to be repaired?
Should I assume the Clinton drop in Fed Employees includes the military, that of course was being downsized because of the End of the Cold War he inherited?
Well, that's an odd response.
My post was obviously a response to number TWO of your SHotgun Fallacy argument.
Did you cut and paste that BS without even reading it?
denial of fact rears it's misshapen head!ever hear the phrases: off topic, irrelevant or non sequitur?true! today's gop is just that!What a load of crap.
Should I assume the Federal Employees includes the expanded military? That so needed to be repaired?
Should I assume the Clinton drop in Fed Employees includes the military, that of course was being downsized because of the End of the Cold War he inherited?
Well, that's an odd response.
My post was obviously a response to number TWO of your SHotgun Fallacy argument.
Did you cut and paste that BS without even reading it?
I read it before I posted it and what you are referring to is not relevant to this discussion, it's a deflection, the point I WAS MAKING is to kosh or gash as I like to call him/her.denial of fact rears it's misshapen head!ever hear the phrases: off topic, irrelevant or non sequitur?true! today's gop is just that!
Should I assume the Federal Employees includes the expanded military? That so needed to be repaired?
Should I assume the Clinton drop in Fed Employees includes the military, that of course was being downsized because of the End of the Cold War he inherited?
Well, that's an odd response.
My post was obviously a response to number TWO of your SHotgun Fallacy argument.
Did you cut and paste that BS without even reading it?
So, you read your own post and see what I was referring to, Good.
Now, can you link to where those numbers do NOT include military personnel?
Or did you not expect anyone to call you on your shotgun fallacy argument?
yeah thats one more thing our corrupt school system has brainwashed the american people on that JFK got us into vietnam when in reality,he inherited vietnam from Eisenhower.JFK did not give us Vietnam. We learned a few years ago from declassified docs that JFK intended to withdraw from Vietnam after the '64 election.
JFK greatly boosted military spending, pushed for an enormous tax cut, tried to impose some sanity on our currency, and held federal spending to its smallest rate of increase since that time, among other good things.
Was JFK Bad for America?
JFK did not give us Vietnam. We learned a few years ago from declassified docs that JFK intended to withdraw from Vietnam after the '64 election.
yeah thats one more thing our corrupt school system has brainwashed the american people on that JFK got us into vietnam when in reality,he inherited vietnam from Eisenhower.JFK did not give us Vietnam. We learned a few years ago from declassified docs that JFK intended to withdraw from Vietnam after the '64 election.
JFK greatly boosted military spending, pushed for an enormous tax cut, tried to impose some sanity on our currency, and held federal spending to its smallest rate of increase since that time, among other good things.
Was JFK Bad for America?
Towards the end of his presidency Ike drew up plans for covert wars to take place in vietnam that were nearly implemented.Kennedy inherited Eisenhowers policys and resisted the military brass to carry out those plans. as you said,he intended to withdraw from vietnam after the 64 election.
after he was assassinated though Lyndon Johnson reversed his policys and implemented Eisenhowers covert policys. this was all declassified in documents from the Eisenhower.Kennedy and Johnson administrations.
this is a great book on it everyone should read.
American Tragedy is the first book to draw on complete official documentation to tell the full story of how we became involved in Vietnam--and the story it tells decisively challenges widely held assumptions about the roles of Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson. Using an enormous range of source materials from these administrations, Kaiser shows how the policies that led to the war were developed during Eisenhower's tenure and nearly implemented in the closing days of his administration in response to a crisis in Laos; how Kennedy immediately reversed course on Laos and refused for three years to follow recommendations for military action in Southeast Asia; and how Eisenhower's policies reemerged in the military intervention mounted by the Johnson administration.
American Tragedy Kennedy Johnson and the Origins of the Vietnam War - David E. Kaiser - Google Books
here is a couple of excellent articles on it as well.the second link is a REALLY good in depth read on it if you have a serious interest in the truth..
JFK s Vietnam Withdrawal Plan Is a Fact Not Speculation The Nation
The Vietnam War and the Assassination of JFK - JFK Assassination Debate - The Education Forum
if you've never encountered handjob be warned that if you contradict him, you are automatically a paid disinformation agent for the illuminati...Our corrupt school system. Do you have other scape goats in your bag of bullshit.
yeah thats one more thing our corrupt school system has brainwashed the american people on that JFK got us into vietnam when in reality,he inherited vietnam from Eisenhower.JFK did not give us Vietnam. We learned a few years ago from declassified docs that JFK intended to withdraw from Vietnam after the '64 election.
JFK greatly boosted military spending, pushed for an enormous tax cut, tried to impose some sanity on our currency, and held federal spending to its smallest rate of increase since that time, among other good things.
Was JFK Bad for America?
Towards the end of his presidency Ike drew up plans for covert wars to take place in vietnam that were nearly implemented.Kennedy inherited Eisenhowers policys and resisted the military brass to carry out those plans. as you said,he intended to withdraw from vietnam after the 64 election.
after he was assassinated though Lyndon Johnson reversed his policys and implemented Eisenhowers covert policys. this was all declassified in documents from the Eisenhower.Kennedy and Johnson administrations.
this is a great book on it everyone should read.
American Tragedy is the first book to draw on complete official documentation to tell the full story of how we became involved in Vietnam--and the story it tells decisively challenges widely held assumptions about the roles of Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson. Using an enormous range of source materials from these administrations, Kaiser shows how the policies that led to the war were developed during Eisenhower's tenure and nearly implemented in the closing days of his administration in response to a crisis in Laos; how Kennedy immediately reversed course on Laos and refused for three years to follow recommendations for military action in Southeast Asia; and how Eisenhower's policies reemerged in the military intervention mounted by the Johnson administration.
American Tragedy Kennedy Johnson and the Origins of the Vietnam War - David E. Kaiser - Google Books
here is a couple of excellent articles on it as well.the second link is a REALLY good in depth read on it if you have a serious interest in the truth..
JFK s Vietnam Withdrawal Plan Is a Fact Not Speculation The Nation
The Vietnam War and the Assassination of JFK - JFK Assassination Debate - The Education Forum