- Jul 21, 2009
- 133,138
- 69,811
Apparently secondhand knowledge of an offense doesn't fall under Whistleblower protections because it's not considered legit unless it's something the complainer heard himself.
So why is this person even considered a whistleblower in the first place?
Here's form with the specific language highlighted:
So why is this person even considered a whistleblower in the first place?
Here's form with the specific language highlighted: