Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are correct this isn't a criminal trial...........it is a mockery of justice............and had this been a real court room...........it would have already been dismissed for lack of evidence............The 6th is for criminal trials. This is (1) not a trial and (2) not a criminal proceeding.Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. ESTY'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.
Bullies?
ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?
A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.
Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.
Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.
But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.
You lose.
Hey, where was the significant evidence that Clinton did something shady with some land deal in Arkansas?? Or did you think the Whitewater investigation was about a blow job??It is the Congress's lame attempt to be a Grand Jury..............The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants....has Trump been charged with a crime?Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. ESTY'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.
Bullies?
ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?
A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.
Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.
Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.
But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.
you do understand that impeachment is not a criminal trial right??
The whole impeachment process is in the constitution too.....
One key difference is that in the courts ..........sufficient evidence to call for a Grand Jury is a requirement.........
Where is that significant evidence before it began..........mic drop.........BTW ......DOJ threw out the phone call as a possible crime already. Nothing there burger again.
Well, it's great to know that the Republican Senate has already made up its mind, in a strictly partisan move, without so much as considering any evidence. That's what I like, open minds.Annnnnnnd.,.........your side needs to learn how to use it...........Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. ESTY'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.
Bullies?
ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?
A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.
Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.
Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.
But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.
What does the 6th say................hmmmmm..............
Congress isn't a real court room..........and is currently a laughing stock of the world.............you are too blind to see it..........
This is a setup after years of attempts.........and here you go with your panties in a wad that no one is buying your BS.
It is DOA at the Senate...........plans are to dismiss as soon as it shows up.
One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.
I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.
Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"
Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.
One is right and the other is wrong.
If Schiff really had something solid to begin with, this would have been over by now.
Schiff keeps looking ,so far nothing but hearsay, false theories and assumptions.
You are correct this isn't a criminal trial...........it is a mockery of justice............and had this been a real court room...........it would have already been dismissed for lack of evidence............The 6th is for criminal trials. This is (1) not a trial and (2) not a criminal proceeding.Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. ESTBullies?
ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?
A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.
Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.
Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.
But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.
You lose.
So it's a SHOW...............a Circus..........
Mebelle claimed that ABC or CBS outed the whistleblower, which is not true..and you have presented evidence of such....What person's reply to what? I'm interested but not following...I am really anxious to see what that person's reply is going to be.....but I have my suspicions it will be something like "Trump won, deal with it libtards"A Fox News guest, conservative radio host Lars Larson, became the first person to name the suspected Ukraine whistleblower live on any of the top broadcast or cable television network...Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.
.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.
Bullies?
ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?
A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.
Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.
The suspected whistleblower's name has not been used on CNN, MSNBC, NBC News, ABC News or CBS News.
Fox News Guest Names Suspected Ukraine Whistleblower
AND STAY OUT OF MY PANTIES!Annnnnnnd.,.........your side needs to learn how to use it...........Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. ESTY'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.
Bullies?
ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?
A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.
Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.
Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.
But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.
What does the 6th say................hmmmmm..............
Congress isn't a real court room..........and is currently a laughing stock of the world.............you are too blind to see it..........
This is a setup after years of attempts.........and here you go with your panties in a wad that no one is buying your BS.
It is DOA at the Senate...........plans are to dismiss as soon as it shows up.
The Savings and loans scandal ........hmmm......everyone but the Clintons were either dead or jailed......imagine that.........the only 2 innocent ones there were the Clintons..............Wow.Hey, where was the significant evidence that Clinton did something shady with some land deal in Arkansas?? Or did you think the Whitewater investigation was about a blow job??It is the Congress's lame attempt to be a Grand Jury..............The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants....has Trump been charged with a crime?Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. ESTBullies?
ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?
A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.
Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.
Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.
But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.
you do understand that impeachment is not a criminal trial right??
The whole impeachment process is in the constitution too.....
One key difference is that in the courts ..........sufficient evidence to call for a Grand Jury is a requirement.........
Where is that significant evidence before it began..........mic drop.........BTW ......DOJ threw out the phone call as a possible crime already. Nothing there burger again.
Well, it's great to know that the Republican Senate has already made up its mind, in a strictly partisan move, without so much as considering any evidence. That's what I like, open minds.Annnnnnnd.,.........your side needs to learn how to use it...........Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. ESTBullies?
ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?
A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.
Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.
Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.
But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.
What does the 6th say................hmmmmm..............
Congress isn't a real court room..........and is currently a laughing stock of the world.............you are too blind to see it..........
This is a setup after years of attempts.........and here you go with your panties in a wad that no one is buying your BS.
It is DOA at the Senate...........plans are to dismiss as soon as it shows up.
They don't see jack squat in the phone call................and it is known the whistle blower is a Dem wack job anyways...........Well, it's great to know that the Republican Senate has already made up its mind, in a strictly partisan move, without so much as considering any evidence. That's what I like, open minds.Annnnnnnd.,.........your side needs to learn how to use it...........Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. ESTBullies?
ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?
A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.
Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.
Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.
But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.
What does the 6th say................hmmmmm..............
Congress isn't a real court room..........and is currently a laughing stock of the world.............you are too blind to see it..........
This is a setup after years of attempts.........and here you go with your panties in a wad that no one is buying your BS.
It is DOA at the Senate...........plans are to dismiss as soon as it shows up.
You are correct this isn't a criminal trial...........it is a mockery of justice............and had this been a real court room...........it would have already been dismissed for lack of evidence............The 6th is for criminal trials. This is (1) not a trial and (2) not a criminal proceeding.Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. EST
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.
Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.
But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.
You lose.
So it's a SHOW...............a Circus..........
No, it's called an investigation. New word for you?
LOL. Seems we've been here before ... often.We'll see.One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.
I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.
Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"
Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.
One is right and the other is wrong.
If Schiff really had something solid to begin with, this would have been over by now.
Schiff keeps looking ,so far nothing but hearsay, false theories and assumptions.
.
For about the billionth time, Schiff did not get "caught" helping to plot it or set it up. OMG. The whistleblower went to the committee staff because the whistleblower works in Washington for Washington and so he knows who would end up with this baby in the end. So he asked and they told him where to file it, which was not with them.They don't see jack squat in the phone call................and it is known the whistle blower is a Dem wack job anyways...........Well, it's great to know that the Republican Senate has already made up its mind, in a strictly partisan move, without so much as considering any evidence. That's what I like, open minds.Annnnnnnd.,.........your side needs to learn how to use it...........Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. EST
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.
Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.
But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.
What does the 6th say................hmmmmm..............
Congress isn't a real court room..........and is currently a laughing stock of the world.............you are too blind to see it..........
This is a setup after years of attempts.........and here you go with your panties in a wad that no one is buying your BS.
It is DOA at the Senate...........plans are to dismiss as soon as it shows up.
Schiff got caught already helping plot it.............For a set up attempt........the Dem party really sucks at it.
And ok.............away from your panties........lol..........nice response........lol
The guy was a bad boy in the Demmie spin room under Obummer, who my gut tells me started out as Hillary's ticket to ride to the top of the ticket when he was done, and she did. Unfortunately, people don't like somebody who chewed somebody out good in a screaming fit, and who then went out and shot himself twice in the back of the head the same day. So Hillary bides her time thinking up ways to hammer Donald Trump and makes sure he gets dealt every card she has from the bottom of the deck. The Whistleblower wasn't a whistleblower, period. Too bad Trey Gowdy can't put him on the stand any more since he has to spend all his time protecting his family since his name was on an assassin's list less than 3 years ago.Whistle Blower Protections are idiotic. If The New Media can fire an employee for telling The Truth about a Clinton-Epstein child rape story they squashed, then the Fag-Traitor Eric Ciaramella should be fired and prosecuted for filing false whistle blower report.
Adam Schiff's whistleblower is nothing but a DNC Hack who hates Donald Trump more than Schrzok and his Galpal combined! In case you're into the Big Three MSM Stations, the truth will set you free from them here:
Partisan obfuscator Schiff needs to book a one-way to his beloved Russia!
You can repeat the Lie a million times................doesn't make it true.......For about the billionth time, Schiff did not get "caught" helping to plot it or set it up. OMG. The whistleblower went to the committee staff because the whistleblower works in Washington for Washington and so he knows who would end up with this baby in the end. So he asked and they told him where to file it, which was not with them.They don't see jack squat in the phone call................and it is known the whistle blower is a Dem wack job anyways...........Well, it's great to know that the Republican Senate has already made up its mind, in a strictly partisan move, without so much as considering any evidence. That's what I like, open minds.Annnnnnnd.,.........your side needs to learn how to use it...........Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.
What does the 6th say................hmmmmm..............
Congress isn't a real court room..........and is currently a laughing stock of the world.............you are too blind to see it..........
This is a setup after years of attempts.........and here you go with your panties in a wad that no one is buying your BS.
It is DOA at the Senate...........plans are to dismiss as soon as it shows up.
Schiff got caught already helping plot it.............For a set up attempt........the Dem party really sucks at it.
And ok.............away from your panties........lol..........nice response........lol
Schiff was not there. Schiff probably got told as an interesting fyi that it might be coming. The rest is pure made up baloney.
You do understand a lot of reports have already come out -- and there is nothing...but its funny how when shit comes out connected to Trump, it results in indictments, convictions, and now impeachment.....Is that why Obama, Hillary, Biden or whoever else you want to insert -- is that why none of them have ever been charged with anything....because there was never something solid to begin with?One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.
I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.
Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"
Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.
One is right and the other is wrong.
If Schiff really had something solid to begin with, this would have been over by now.
Schiff keeps looking ,so far nothing but hearsay, false theories and assumptions.
Cool....
We will see when the reports come out.
Barr has some type of solid evidence because it's been moved to a criminal investigation.
You also understand that when this latest report comes out and there is nothing -- you folks will just say it means Obama and the Deep State made it happen..
So I want you to go on the record and tell me if this guy is Deep State or a conservative patriot who will take down Obama??
You don't even know who this guy is do you?? Yet you rest all of your hopes and dreams on him...adorable
View attachment 288776
Well, it's great to know that the Republican Senate has already made up its mind, in a strictly partisan move, without so much as considering any evidence. That's what I like, open minds.
