Adam Schiff's Jig is Up! Woo Hippity Hoo!

[OldLady]

Schiff's jig is up? Are the hearings ended? Really?

Or are you all just masturbating in public again...

Eeeewwwww.....is that what that is?

 

[iceberg]

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

what did the left try and sentence kavanaugh to?

CNN had zero issues outting the manafort jury and what would that have done to their lives, while still on that trial, by the rabid left who loves to attack "at will" also?

we need to focus on the behavior itself regardless of who is doing it or we just perpetuate it.

we need to focus on the behavior itself
Yes, so why won't you?

Havw a good weekend, oldlady. Not going to talk with this attack mode version of you.

 

[MeBelle]

The WB act has nothing to do with political party.

So, don't try making the WB Act something it isn't.

TIA

ROFL

Isn't that what Trump, Beautress, And all right wingers are doing by claiming the WB is a democratic hack ???

I never claimed the WB Act was a democratic hack.

I know what I post is truth and fact - counter my post instead of deflecting to insults.

 

[Care4all]

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Whistleblower protection in the United States - Wikipedia

Office of Inspector General
https://www.oig.doc.gov/pages/faqs-about-oig-investigations.aspx
Section 7 of the Inspector General Act states that “[t]he Inspector General shall not, after receipt of a complaint or information from an employee, disclose the identity of the employee without the consent of the employee, unless the Inspector General determines such disclosure is unavoidable during the course of the investigation.”

You only quoted a law stating the IG is not allowed to disclose it. But that's it. GMU is right. NOWHERE does it say the whistle blower's identity has to remain hidden.

Ok. Is DT Junior the IG? Is anyone else other than the IG the IG? Then that law does not pertain to them.

Thanks for playing.

Who can know it, with certainty, BUT the ICIG or the whistle blower himself?

The only reason Crooked Donald wants it 'revealed is to retaliate against him because the actual witnesses interviewed have pretty good clean records of decades of experience under both party's rule.... And to scare other whistleblowers.

The whistle blower means nothing now, when you have all the first and second hand witnesses under oath, saying the same thing?

 

[MeBelle]

Something you need to consider before being a whistle blower. Your identity is not protected. You don't get to make accusations from behind a curtain.

It's all irrelevant because he doesn't meet the statues set forth to be a whistle blower anyway. They don't apply to the president. They don't apply to private conversations between the president and foreign leaders. That's why they are classified. Trump has a right to privacy without some 3rd party coming in and saying they think they might have heard something from someone else.

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

Bullies?

ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?

A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.

Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.

 

[MeBelle]

"If you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that holla is the one ya’ hit."

Looks like you're the one to 'holla' here ...

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.

I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.

Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"

Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.

One is right and the other is wrong.
If Schiff really had something solid to begin with, this would have been over by now.
Schiff keeps looking ,so far nothing but hearsay, false theories and assumptions.

Is that why Obama, Hillary, Biden or whoever else you want to insert -- is that why none of them have ever been charged with anything....because there was never something solid to begin with?

Cool....

 

[Care4all]

lol
Of course whistleblowers deserve protection but that does not include their identity... If they are a progressive they cannot be trusted

WB protection has always protected their identity if the IG determines such, in order to protect them from intimidation from those being reported on ...retaliation...

And to ENCOURAGE whistleblowers to come forward to report, waste, fraud, and abuse.

This WB took part in creating the salacious lie about nekkid Trump that made people vote Democrat before they found out is was the lie that Donald Trump said it was and caused his wife considerable grief. Trump was never nekkid jumping on a bed with two shady ladies who he did not order to pee on a bed Hillary slept in. Some goddamn whistleblower. The poor little guy. /sardonic attitude spoken

The salacious lie came out thru buzzfeed months after Democrats voted in the election? So no, the alleged pee tape did inot make people vote democrat.

 

[peach174]

One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.

I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.

Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"

Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.

One is right and the other is wrong.
If Schiff really had something solid to begin with, this would have been over by now.
Schiff keeps looking ,so far nothing but hearsay, false theories and assumptions.

Is that why Obama, Hillary, Biden or whoever else you want to insert -- is that why none of them have ever been charged with anything....because there was never something solid to begin with?

Cool....

We will see when the reports come out.
Barr has some type of solid evidence because it's been moved to a criminal investigation.

 

[eagle1462010]

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

I haven't done shit girly, and presidential diplomatic calls are not subject to the whistle blower act. The presidents call had nothing to do with the intel community, so tell the class where the ICIG has any authority in the matter. The only thing you commies have produced is a difference of opinion on policy, a policy the president sets, not lifer bureaucrats.

We already know Hunter Bidens name was brandished at maobamas state dept, trying to influence investigations in Ukraine. We also know Vidman took it upon himself to advise people in Ukraine with no authorization to do so and was concerned with political aspects of policy which is none of his business.

Like Senator Kennedy said, you commies have decided Trump is going to get a fair and impartial firing squat, the facts be damned.

.

"If you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that holla is the one ya’ hit."

What happens when you throw a rock into a pack of donkeys..................do they bray...

lol

 

[eagle1462010]

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

Bullies?

ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?

A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.

Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.

November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. EST
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.

Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.

But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.

Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.

I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.

Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"

Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.

One is right and the other is wrong.
If Schiff really had something solid to begin with, this would have been over by now.
Schiff keeps looking ,so far nothing but hearsay, false theories and assumptions.

Is that why Obama, Hillary, Biden or whoever else you want to insert -- is that why none of them have ever been charged with anything....because there was never something solid to begin with?

Cool....

We will see when the reports come out.
Barr has some type of solid evidence because it's been moved to a criminal investigation.

You do understand a lot of reports have already come out -- and there is nothing...but its funny how when shit comes out connected to Trump, it results in indictments, convictions, and now impeachment.....

You also understand that when this latest report comes out and there is nothing -- you folks will just say it means Obama and the Deep State made it happen..

So I want you to go on the record and tell me if this guy is Deep State or a conservative patriot who will take down Obama??

You don't even know who this guy is do you?? Yet you rest all of your hopes and dreams on him...adorable

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

Bullies?

ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?

A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.

Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.

November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. EST
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.

Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.

But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.

Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants....has Trump been charged with a crime?

you do understand that impeachment is not a criminal trial right??

The whole impeachment process is in the constitution too.....

 

[OldLady]

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

Bullies?

ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?

A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.

Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.

A Fox News guest, conservative radio host Lars Larson, became the first person to name the suspected Ukraine whistleblower live on any of the top broadcast or cable television network...
The suspected whistleblower's name has not been used on CNN, MSNBC, NBC News, ABC News or CBS News.
Fox News Guest Names Suspected Ukraine Whistleblower

 

[eagle1462010]

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

Bullies?

ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?

A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.

Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.

November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. EST
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.

Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.

But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.

Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants....has Trump been charged with a crime?

you do understand that impeachment is not a criminal trial right??

The whole impeachment process is in the constitution too.....

It is the Congress's lame attempt to be a Grand Jury..............

One key difference is that in the courts ..........sufficient evidence to call for a Grand Jury is a requirement.........

Where is that significant evidence before it began..........mic drop.........BTW ......DOJ threw out the phone call as a possible crime already. Nothing there burger again.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

Bullies?

ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?

A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.

Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.

A Fox News guest, conservative radio host Lars Larson, became the first person to name the suspected Ukraine whistleblower live on any of the top broadcast or cable television network...
The suspected whistleblower's name has not been used on CNN, MSNBC, NBC News, ABC News or CBS News.
Fox News Guest Names Suspected Ukraine Whistleblower

I am really anxious to see what that person's reply is going to be.....but I have my suspicions it will be something like "Trump won, deal with it libtards"

 

[OldLady]

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

Bullies?

ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?

A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.

Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.

November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. EST
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.

Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.

But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.

Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.

Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.

 

[OldLady]

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

Bullies?

ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?

A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.

Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.

November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. EST
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.

Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.

But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.

Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.

Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.

The 6th is for criminal trials. This is (1) not a trial and (2) not a criminal proceeding.
You lose.

 

[eagle1462010]

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

Bullies?

ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?

A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.

Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.

November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. EST
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.

Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.

But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.

Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.

Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.

Annnnnnnd.,.........your side needs to learn how to use it...........

What does the 6th say................hmmmmm..............

Congress isn't a real court room..........and is currently a laughing stock of the world.............you are too blind to see it..........

This is a setup after years of attempts.........and here you go with your panties in a wad that no one is buying your BS.

It is DOA at the Senate...........plans are to dismiss as soon as it shows up.

 

[OldLady]

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

Bullies?

ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?

A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.

Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.

A Fox News guest, conservative radio host Lars Larson, became the first person to name the suspected Ukraine whistleblower live on any of the top broadcast or cable television network...
The suspected whistleblower's name has not been used on CNN, MSNBC, NBC News, ABC News or CBS News.
Fox News Guest Names Suspected Ukraine Whistleblower

I am really anxious to see what that person's reply is going to be.....but I have my suspicions it will be something like "Trump won, deal with it libtards"

What person's reply to what? I'm interested but not following...