Adam Schiff's Jig is Up! Woo Hippity Hoo!

[Persistence Of Memory]

 

[OldLady]

B, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?

nice ... your 'descriptives' and 'whatifisms' don't apply here.


The WB act has nothing to do with political party.

So, don't try making the WB Act something it isn't.

TIA

I wasn't talking about the whistleblower act.

 

[OldLady]

Try following the testimony which confirms the behind the scenes, off the reservation pressure to force Zelensky to follow up on a debunked conspiracy theory straight out of Steve Bannon's asshole. All in an attempt to smear Trump's political rival.

There IS no testimony to follow!

Any 'testimony' is in the Dem's Star Chamber and hidden from the public.

Well, I've been getting transcripts. Where have you been?

 

[OKTexas]

I don't know how many times you have to tell these stupid fucking demonrats on this forum that "whistle blower protections" have NOTHING to do with anonymity.

For that matter, this guy doesn't even fit the definition of a whistle blower anyway. So NONE of this "protection" applies to him anyway. Being a legal "whistle blower" is a very specific legal term with very specific requirements. Just "snitching" is not a whistle blower.

How do you protect the WB from intimidation and retaliation, without anonymity silly one...?

How do you encourage WB to come forward without anonymity?

How many of the other 17 WB complaints the IG processed this past year do you know the names of?



YOU are repeating a lie, the right wing is twisting and turning and spinning and pushing to cover for Trump' s retaliation towards the WB.... for his evil.

Something you need to consider before being a whistle blower. Your identity is not protected. You don't get to make accusations from behind a curtain.

It's all irrelevant because he doesn't meet the statues set forth to be a whistle blower anyway. They don't apply to the president. They don't apply to private conversations between the president and foreign leaders. That's why they are classified. Trump has a right to privacy without some 3rd party coming in and saying they think they might have heard something from someone else.

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

 

[OldLady]

How do you protect the WB from intimidation and retaliation, without anonymity silly one...?

How do you encourage WB to come forward without anonymity?

How many of the other 17 WB complaints the IG processed this past year do you know the names of?



YOU are repeating a lie, the right wing is twisting and turning and spinning and pushing to cover for Trump' s retaliation towards the WB.... for his evil.

Something you need to consider before being a whistle blower. Your identity is not protected. You don't get to make accusations from behind a curtain.

It's all irrelevant because he doesn't meet the statues set forth to be a whistle blower anyway. They don't apply to the president. They don't apply to private conversations between the president and foreign leaders. That's why they are classified. Trump has a right to privacy without some 3rd party coming in and saying they think they might have heard something from someone else.

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

 

[g5000]

Adam Schiff's whistleblower is nothing but a DNC Hack who hates Donald Trump more than Schrzok and his Galpal combined! In case you're into the Big Three MSM Stations, the truth will set you free from them here:

​

Partisan obfuscator Schiff needs to book a one-way to his beloved Russia!

​

Yep,
Crazy eyes has zero credibility and appeal.... fact

I agree. Crazy eyes has zero credibility and appeal...fact.

 

[Care4all]

How do you protect the WB from intimidation and retaliation, without anonymity silly one...?

How do you encourage WB to come forward without anonymity?

How many of the other 17 WB complaints the IG processed this past year do you know the names of?



YOU are repeating a lie, the right wing is twisting and turning and spinning and pushing to cover for Trump' s retaliation towards the WB.... for his evil.

Something you need to consider before being a whistle blower. Your identity is not protected. You don't get to make accusations from behind a curtain.

It's all irrelevant because he doesn't meet the statues set forth to be a whistle blower anyway. They don't apply to the president. They don't apply to private conversations between the president and foreign leaders. That's why they are classified. Trump has a right to privacy without some 3rd party coming in and saying they think they might have heard something from someone else.

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

If they qualify as a true whistle blower and it ONLY applies to the IG. NOWHERE does it say anyone else can't reveal their identity.

This should be easy. Back up your claim. Show where the federal whistle blower statute protects their anonymity. Or retract your lie and admit you were wrong.

How would anyone else know who the whistleblower really is without the OH onfirming it?

How do you protect the WB from intimidation and retaliation, without anonymity silly one...?

How do you encourage WB to come forward without anonymity?

How many of the other 17 WB complaints the IG processed this past year do you know the names of?



YOU are repeating a lie, the right wing is twisting and turning and spinning and pushing to cover for Trump' s retaliation towards the WB.... for his evil.

Something you need to consider before being a whistle blower. Your identity is not protected. You don't get to make accusations from behind a curtain.

It's all irrelevant because he doesn't meet the statues set forth to be a whistle blower anyway. They don't apply to the president. They don't apply to private conversations between the president and foreign leaders. That's why they are classified. Trump has a right to privacy without some 3rd party coming in and saying they think they might have heard something from someone else.

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

The spirit of the law has purpose, keeping them anonymous has purpose.

Unless the media has the IG or the whistle blower admitting such, there is no certainty.

The whistle blower law allows WB to go directly to congress if they get no results with superiors....And congress has to keep them anonymous if they do, just as the IG AND following the intent and spirit of the law.

The president is illegally retaliating, and intimidating the whistleblower and spitting on the spirit of the law and purpose of the law itself.

THE IG DETERMINED this is a credible whistleblower.

 

[iceberg]

Something you need to consider before being a whistle blower. Your identity is not protected. You don't get to make accusations from behind a curtain.

It's all irrelevant because he doesn't meet the statues set forth to be a whistle blower anyway. They don't apply to the president. They don't apply to private conversations between the president and foreign leaders. That's why they are classified. Trump has a right to privacy without some 3rd party coming in and saying they think they might have heard something from someone else.

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

If they qualify as a true whistle blower and it ONLY applies to the IG. NOWHERE does it say anyone else can't reveal their identity.

This should be easy. Back up your claim. Show where the federal whistle blower statute protects their anonymity. Or retract your lie and admit you were wrong.

How would anyone else know who the whistleblower really is without the OH onfirming it?

Something you need to consider before being a whistle blower. Your identity is not protected. You don't get to make accusations from behind a curtain.

It's all irrelevant because he doesn't meet the statues set forth to be a whistle blower anyway. They don't apply to the president. They don't apply to private conversations between the president and foreign leaders. That's why they are classified. Trump has a right to privacy without some 3rd party coming in and saying they think they might have heard something from someone else.

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

The spirit of the law has purpose, keeping them anonymous has purpose.

Unless the media has the IG or the whistle blower admitting such, there is no certainty.

The whistle blower law allows WB to go directly to congress if they get no results with superiors....And congress has to keep them anonymous if they do, just as the IG AND following the intent and spirit of the law.

The president is illegally retaliating, and intimidating the whistleblower and spitting on the spirit of the law and purpose of the law itself.

THE IG DETERMINED this is a credible whistleblower.

the DOJ determined trump did nothing wrong.

wheeee.

 

[OKTexas]

Something you need to consider before being a whistle blower. Your identity is not protected. You don't get to make accusations from behind a curtain.

It's all irrelevant because he doesn't meet the statues set forth to be a whistle blower anyway. They don't apply to the president. They don't apply to private conversations between the president and foreign leaders. That's why they are classified. Trump has a right to privacy without some 3rd party coming in and saying they think they might have heard something from someone else.

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

I haven't done shit girly, and presidential diplomatic calls are not subject to the whistle blower act. The presidents call had nothing to do with the intel community, so tell the class where the ICIG has any authority in the matter. The only thing you commies have produced is a difference of opinion on policy, a policy the president sets, not lifer bureaucrats.

We already know Hunter Bidens name was brandished at maobamas state dept, trying to influence investigations in Ukraine. We also know Vidman took it upon himself to advise people in Ukraine with no authorization to do so and was concerned with political aspects of policy which is none of his business.

Like Senator Kennedy said, you commies have decided Trump is going to get a fair and impartial firing squat, the facts be damned.

.

 

[g5000]

Adam Schiff's whistleblower is nothing but a DNC Hack who hates Donald Trump more than Schrzok and his Galpal combined! In case you're into the Big Three MSM Stations, the truth will set you free from them here:

​

Partisan obfuscator Schiff needs to book a one-way to his beloved Russia!

​

 

[WillPower]

That Tucker Carlson guy is one of the American television's biggest political propagandist hacks. He has no credibility and is one of the last people for referring anyone else to being a hack. His specialty is brainwashing and scamming dupes, suckers, and lemmings.

Really? So why did antifa storm his house and chase his wife and kids into the pantry? Tucker is running this farce up your asses and you know it so eat your insects like AOC ordered and STFU.

 

[iceberg]

Something you need to consider before being a whistle blower. Your identity is not protected. You don't get to make accusations from behind a curtain.

It's all irrelevant because he doesn't meet the statues set forth to be a whistle blower anyway. They don't apply to the president. They don't apply to private conversations between the president and foreign leaders. That's why they are classified. Trump has a right to privacy without some 3rd party coming in and saying they think they might have heard something from someone else.

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.

what did the left try and sentence kavanaugh to?

CNN had zero issues outting the manafort jury and what would that have done to their lives, while still on that trial, by the rabid left who loves to attack "at will" also?

we need to focus on the behavior itself regardless of who is doing it or we just perpetuate it.

 

[OKTexas]

Something you need to consider before being a whistle blower. Your identity is not protected. You don't get to make accusations from behind a curtain.

It's all irrelevant because he doesn't meet the statues set forth to be a whistle blower anyway. They don't apply to the president. They don't apply to private conversations between the president and foreign leaders. That's why they are classified. Trump has a right to privacy without some 3rd party coming in and saying they think they might have heard something from someone else.

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

If they qualify as a true whistle blower and it ONLY applies to the IG. NOWHERE does it say anyone else can't reveal their identity.

This should be easy. Back up your claim. Show where the federal whistle blower statute protects their anonymity. Or retract your lie and admit you were wrong.

How would anyone else know who the whistleblower really is without the OH onfirming it?

Something you need to consider before being a whistle blower. Your identity is not protected. You don't get to make accusations from behind a curtain.

It's all irrelevant because he doesn't meet the statues set forth to be a whistle blower anyway. They don't apply to the president. They don't apply to private conversations between the president and foreign leaders. That's why they are classified. Trump has a right to privacy without some 3rd party coming in and saying they think they might have heard something from someone else.

Yes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.

NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE

Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.

The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.

Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.

.

The spirit of the law has purpose, keeping them anonymous has purpose.

Unless the media has the IG or the whistle blower admitting such, there is no certainty.

The whistle blower law allows WB to go directly to congress if they get no results with superiors....And congress has to keep them anonymous if they do, just as the IG AND following the intent and spirit of the law.

The president is illegally retaliating, and intimidating the whistleblower and spitting on the spirit of the law and purpose of the law itself.

THE IG DETERMINED this is a credible whistleblower.

OK, let's get down to the basics, show me in the law or the ICIGs job description, where the ICIG has any authority to investigate presidential diplomatic calls. If you can't show that authority, what he may have determined isn't relevant, is it?

.

 

[JustAGuy1]

That Tucker Carlson guy is one of the American television's biggest political propagandist hacks. He has no credibility and is one of the last people for referring anyone else to being a hack. His specialty is brainwashing and scamming dupes, suckers, and lemmings.

LOL, you're simply full of it. You're thinking of Maddow. Tucker is even keeled and is fair to EVERYONE who comes on his show from either side. (as long as they don't try and lie)

 

[Billy_Bob]

One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.

I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.

Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"

Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.

MSLSD.... Is on a trip... They have squat... Its shit... A big pile of conspiracy shit...

 

[g5000]

Schiff's jig is up? Are the hearings ended? Really?

Or are you all just masturbating in public again...

 

[bendog]

One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.

I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.

Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"

Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.

1% maybe 2% will find this important

 

[depotoo]

That Tucker Carlson guy is one of the American television's biggest political propagandist hacks. He has no credibility and is one of the last people for referring anyone else to being a hack. His specialty is brainwashing and scamming dupes, suckers, and lemmings.

Uhh, not really. It was only after certain evidence came to light that he began to see the forest through the trees. He was always a detractor of Trump’s.

 

[westwall]

One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.

I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.

Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"

Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.

Indeed. And if you bother to do more than a surface check you find that MSNBC is promulgating lies, just like all the rest of the MSM.

Dive a tiny bit deeper if you dare.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Adam Schiff's whistleblower is nothing but a DNC Hack who hates Donald Trump more than Schrzok and his Galpal combined! In case you're into the Big Three MSM Stations, the truth will set you free from them here:
Partisan obfuscator Schiff needs to book a one-way to his beloved Russia!

...........next Democrat Character Assassination plot against Trump in ....5....4....3....2....1......

I wonder how may will ever figure out this is all a Dog & Pony Show designed to keep the American People distracted while the DC Criminal Cartel continues to revoke Liberties and Rights?