Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Adam Schiff's whistleblower is nothing but a DNC Hack who hates Donald Trump more than Schrzok and his Galpal combined! In case you're into the Big Three MSM Stations, the truth will set you free from them here:
Partisan obfuscator Schiff needs to book a one-way to his beloved Russia!
The House majority currently is in full metal jacket mode, gunning for President Trump's removal without so much as a trace of corruption, since the president is getting pretty good counsel from his certified public accountants, juris doctor type lawyers and of course, the indefatigueable Rudy.Discussions of whistle lowers are not relevant unless there really is a whistle blower. Falsely claiming to be a whistle blower as part of a political strategy does not make a person into a whistle blower.
Heroes are not found among those who embellish lies before moving onto higher class lies to be used as propaganda, dear lady.Well, some of us see him as a hero. Hope he's not harrassed.Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.
Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection
I don't know how many times you have to tell these stupid fucking demonrats on this forum that "whistle blower protections" have NOTHING to do with anonymity.
For that matter, this guy doesn't even fit the definition of a whistle blower anyway. So NONE of this "protection" applies to him anyway. Being a legal "whistle blower" is a very specific legal term with very specific requirements. Just "snitching" is not a whistle blower.
You seem to have missed an important question. Can you answer it without a prefab bumper sticker talking point? Can you answer it one lady to another, honestly?The House majority currently is in full metal jacket mode, gunning for President Trump's removal without so much as a trace of corruption, since the president is getting pretty good counsel from his certified public accountants, juris doctor type lawyers and of course, the indefatigueable Rudy.Discussions of whistle lowers are not relevant unless there really is a whistle blower. Falsely claiming to be a whistle blower as part of a political strategy does not make a person into a whistle blower.
Heroes are not found among those who embellish lies before moving onto higher class lies to be used as propaganda, dear lady.Well, some of us see him as a hero. Hope he's not harrassed.Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.
Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection
I don't know how many times you have to tell these stupid fucking demonrats on this forum that "whistle blower protections" have NOTHING to do with anonymity.
For that matter, this guy doesn't even fit the definition of a whistle blower anyway. So NONE of this "protection" applies to him anyway. Being a legal "whistle blower" is a very specific legal term with very specific requirements. Just "snitching" is not a whistle blower.
The creep participated in the nekkid Trump salacious lie and the dissemination of the alleged lies of the Steel Dossier. He's a hack, not a whistleblower. And damn, if he didn't collude for a couple of days with none other than Adam Schiff to make certain they were on the same lies to tell down to the last detail lie.ROFLB, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?
nice ... your 'descriptives' and 'whatifisms' don't apply here.
The WB act has nothing to do with political party.
So, don't try making the WB Act something it isn't.
TIA
Isn't that what Trump, Beautress, And all right wingers are doing by claiming the WB is a democratic hack ???
Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHEREYes you do get to be anonymous as a WB, to protect you from retaliation and intimidation and the IG under LAW can not reveal the WB with few exceptions, like a court order from a judge in a criminal proceeding.Something you need to consider before being a whistle blower. Your identity is not protected. You don't get to make accusations from behind a curtain.
It's all irrelevant because he doesn't meet the statues set forth to be a whistle blower anyway. They don't apply to the president. They don't apply to private conversations between the president and foreign leaders. That's why they are classified. Trump has a right to privacy without some 3rd party coming in and saying they think they might have heard something from someone else.
Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.
Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.
.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.
Adam Schiff's whistleblower is nothing but a DNC Hack who hates Donald Trump more than Schrzok and his Galpal combined! In case you're into the Big Three MSM Stations, the truth will set you free from them here:
Partisan obfuscator Schiff needs to book a one-way to his beloved Russia!
Yep,
Crazy eyes has zero credibility and appeal.... fact
I agree. Crazy eyes has zero credibility and appeal...fact.
Avoiding facts is also deceptive and dishonest.One can be biased and still be HONEST or present facts.Or, more likely, they're both comically biased, blatantly myopic, intellectually dishonest, and playing their viewers for fools.One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.
I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.
Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"
Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.
yet both can’t be true. The real lesson here is you have no free press. You have propaganda outlets of Pravda proportions.
.
One can not be deceptive and still be honest and their facts are often mixed with falsehoods
.
the left also brought us kavanaugh. that turned out to simply be a lie to protect what they felt important. i didn't see a lot of sympathy for the other side from them nor what they were doing to otherwise innocent people.B, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?How can a Democrat hack be a whistleblower, pray tell? Because Adam Schiff keeps his name a secret for over a year before he strikes like the snake that he is?Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.
Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?
when these types of games end it will be much easier to take them seriously. otherwise, how do i know this is simply not *another* kavanaugh?
Oh pu leezthe left also brought us kavanaugh. that turned out to simply be a lie to protect what they felt important. i didn't see a lot of sympathy for the other side from them nor what they were doing to otherwise innocent people.B, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?How can a Democrat hack be a whistleblower, pray tell? Because Adam Schiff keeps his name a secret for over a year before he strikes like the snake that he is?Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.
Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?
when these types of games end it will be much easier to take them seriously. otherwise, how do i know this is simply not *another* kavanaugh?
What, precisely, was found to be a lie? Uncorroborated doesn't equal disproven.
Oh pu leezthe left also brought us kavanaugh. that turned out to simply be a lie to protect what they felt important. i didn't see a lot of sympathy for the other side from them nor what they were doing to otherwise innocent people.B, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?How can a Democrat hack be a whistleblower, pray tell? Because Adam Schiff keeps his name a secret for over a year before he strikes like the snake that he is?Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.
Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?
when these types of games end it will be much easier to take them seriously. otherwise, how do i know this is simply not *another* kavanaugh?
What, precisely, was found to be a lie? Uncorroborated doesn't equal disproven.
dunno. but you should know by now I pay next to zero attention to your 1 sided ramblings.Oh pu leezthe left also brought us kavanaugh. that turned out to simply be a lie to protect what they felt important. i didn't see a lot of sympathy for the other side from them nor what they were doing to otherwise innocent people.B, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?How can a Democrat hack be a whistleblower, pray tell? Because Adam Schiff keeps his name a secret for over a year before he strikes like the snake that he is?
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?
when these types of games end it will be much easier to take them seriously. otherwise, how do i know this is simply not *another* kavanaugh?
What, precisely, was found to be a lie? Uncorroborated doesn't equal disproven.
So no proof? Why am I not surprised.
Opinion | Why the FBI’s apparent failure to fully investigate Kavanaugh cannot be ignored
Well, it's great to know that the Republican Senate has already made up its mind, in a strictly partisan move, without so much as considering any evidence. That's what I like, open minds.Annnnnnnd.,.........your side needs to learn how to use it...........Aaaaannnndddd.....if no other argument seems to be working, try hiding behind the Constitution.Riddle me this............What is the 6th Amendment and the Confrontation clause..............any more questions.November 7, 2019 at 10:41 p.m. ESTBullies?
ABC is a bully, or was it NBC, that originally outed this fellow?
A few other of 'news agencies' outed this poor fellow also.
Do your homework, stop acting uneducated.
Tweets on Wednesday by Donald Trump Jr. capped more than a month of efforts by President Trump’s allies to surface the supposed name of a whistleblower whose complaint about a July 25 phone call led to the House’s impeachment inquiry.
Most news organizations, including The Washington Post, have withheld the name of the whistleblower, whose complaint about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been largely confirmed by diplomats and others with firsthand knowledge as well as by a reconstructed transcript released by the White House. The whistleblower’s name has been kept confidential by U.S. officials, in line with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.
But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.
What does the 6th say................hmmmmm..............
Congress isn't a real court room..........and is currently a laughing stock of the world.............you are too blind to see it..........
This is a setup after years of attempts.........and here you go with your panties in a wad that no one is buying your BS.
It is DOA at the Senate...........plans are to dismiss as soon as it shows up.
well thats the way it is in many threads here.....the righties and lefties will watch the same show and it seems after their comments that they were watching 2 different shows....One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.
I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.
Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"
Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.
Not really. One seeks to absorb facts and other seeks to cover facts with faked feelings.well thats the way it is in many threads here.....the righties and lefties will watch the same show and it seems after their comments that they were watching 2 different shows....One may as well try to look for the humor in this embarrassing mess.
I flipped back and forth last night during halftime between Fox and MSNBC.
Fox: "They have nothing!" MSNBC: "They have everything!"
Alternate universes. Try to laugh.
.
You seem to have missed an important question. Can you answer it without a prefab bumper sticker talking point? Can you answer it one lady to another, honestly?The House majority currently is in full metal jacket mode, gunning for President Trump's removal without so much as a trace of corruption, since the president is getting pretty good counsel from his certified public accountants, juris doctor type lawyers and of course, the indefatigueable Rudy.Discussions of whistle lowers are not relevant unless there really is a whistle blower. Falsely claiming to be a whistle blower as part of a political strategy does not make a person into a whistle blower.
Heroes are not found among those who embellish lies before moving onto higher class lies to be used as propaganda, dear lady.Well, some of us see him as a hero. Hope he's not harrassed.Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.
Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection
I don't know how many times you have to tell these stupid fucking demonrats on this forum that "whistle blower protections" have NOTHING to do with anonymity.
For that matter, this guy doesn't even fit the definition of a whistle blower anyway. So NONE of this "protection" applies to him anyway. Being a legal "whistle blower" is a very specific legal term with very specific requirements. Just "snitching" is not a whistle blower.
B, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?
the left also brought us kavanaugh. that turned out to simply be a lie to protect what they felt important. i didn't see a lot of sympathy for the other side from them nor what they were doing to otherwise innocent people.B, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?How can a Democrat hack be a whistleblower, pray tell? Because Adam Schiff keeps his name a secret for over a year before he strikes like the snake that he is?Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.
Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?
when these types of games end it will be much easier to take them seriously. otherwise, how do i know this is simply not *another* kavanaugh?
What, precisely, was found to be a lie? Uncorroborated doesn't equal disproven.
Just more ignore fact and definition crap from you allthe left also brought us kavanaugh. that turned out to simply be a lie to protect what they felt important. i didn't see a lot of sympathy for the other side from them nor what they were doing to otherwise innocent people.B, how would you feel if you were working in government for ten, fifteen years and the current administration was Democrats and one of them was doing something illegal, but when you reported them under the whistleblower act, you were completely laughed out of town and discredited because you are a conservative?How can a Democrat hack be a whistleblower, pray tell? Because Adam Schiff keeps his name a secret for over a year before he strikes like the snake that he is?Whistle blower protections = protection from retribution.
Whistle blower protections =/= identity protection
Would that seem fair to you?
Only conservatives have a say in what is right or wrong now? All others will be ignored or worse?
when these types of games end it will be much easier to take them seriously. otherwise, how do i know this is simply not *another* kavanaugh?
What, precisely, was found to be a lie? Uncorroborated doesn't equal disproven.
"If you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that holla is the one ya’ hit."Y'all have sure made excuses for outting the guy, because you know what you've done. You know what you've sentenced him to and you're glad of it, but you'll hide from taking any responsibility for it at the same time.The law states the IG can not reveal them if the WB chooses to stay anonymous, with very few exceptions.NOWHERE in the statute does it state that a whistleblower identity is to remain hidden. NOWHERE
Get educated ffs. Really sucks ballz that idiots like you get to cancel my vote with your uninformed vote.
Yeah, except the guy didn't just go to the IG, did he? No one, outside the IG, has any obligation to keep the guys name quiet. Nothing in the law can tie the hand of reporters if they know his name.
.
Bullies. Nothing but bullies.
I haven't done shit girly, and presidential diplomatic calls are not subject to the whistle blower act. The presidents call had nothing to do with the intel community, so tell the class where the ICIG has any authority in the matter. The only thing you commies have produced is a difference of opinion on policy, a policy the president sets, not lifer bureaucrats.
We already know Hunter Bidens name was brandished at maobamas state dept, trying to influence investigations in Ukraine. We also know Vidman took it upon himself to advise people in Ukraine with no authorization to do so and was concerned with political aspects of policy which is none of his business.
Like Senator Kennedy said, you commies have decided Trump is going to get a fair and impartial firing squat, the facts be damned.
.
