With social media these days, they'll have to start cultivating a jury pool of off-the-grid types to get good rulings.As an armchair arbiter, I'd say 1 to 10 million from the culpable organization. The family has likely already incurred significant costs and the kid needs to be protected for awhile until the fringe crazies move on. Who knows maybe more comes out in the lawsuit.Some prominent jounalists and pundits framed the kid to be a bad guy before getting the full story. They got the story wrong...or not entirely correct..which lead to your standard social media pitchfork mob reigning down on the poor kid, his family, and school.I am amazed that a dumb ass tard like yourself can generate enough
brain power to type your bull shit…..
I would bet you couldn’t type and fart at the same time without blowing a fuse………
Do you understand simple math?
If I make a million a year and your dumb ass makes 100,000. a year, you do understand
that if we were both taxed at 10% I would pay 100,000. and your dumb ass would pay 10,000.
Later you Super Duper Shit….
oooOOooo, Haiku
I wouldnt be. The punishment should equal the crime. The only time I support a large settlement is when consequences are severe like certain death or drastic and permanent reduction in quality of life due to negligent or intentional malfeasance. I'm talking people being robbed of their livelihood and excessively traumatized. Or...smaller transgressions carried out en masse with a paper trail of diabolic intention.
In the case of this kid, he will live on just fine and has been mostly exonerated of any wrong doing. At worst, he has suffered some undue trauma and likely had to watch his back for a bit, so he does deserve something maybe in the low millions.
From who? For what?
Hey if I go stand nose-to-nose with somebody and smirk, can I get some low millions too? I'm not picky, I'll even take medium millions.
And here I thought you had to actually work for that sort of thing.
He's a minor. Smirking isnt a crime worthy of what he got in blowback which was generated by the misleading headlines and editorials. The kid got death threats. That isnt acceptable and the disseminators of the incorrect narrative are culpable.
What would you think would be the proper compensation? I think $250 million is way to high.
Until I see more of the case, I’m inclined to think $250,000 to $5 million, I can’t see a court going much more than that, however jury cases can be unpredictable.