CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 147,131
- 70,306
- 2,330
The best way to identify AGW as a fraud is to note how little it has in common with true science.
Take Gravity for example, Newton proposed a set of equations for computing the "Force" of gravity and they held up for centuries. At the turn of the 20th Century, Albert Einstein proposed a theory that both clarified and upended Newton's Theory of Gravity. 100 years later, Einstein's Theory is STILL subject to rigorous testing to see under what circumstances it might fail and have to be discarded and replaced with a New Theory.
At no point is it ever "Settled Science", Gravity is not "Settled Science"
It is only the arrogance and fraudulent nature of the AGWCult that calls its "Science "Settled"
Physicist Michio Kaku remarked that if Einsteins Theory failed even on a single data point it would have to be discarded, why isn't AGW subject to the same standard? How can anyone even call it "science" when it's less reliable than astrology
Take Gravity for example, Newton proposed a set of equations for computing the "Force" of gravity and they held up for centuries. At the turn of the 20th Century, Albert Einstein proposed a theory that both clarified and upended Newton's Theory of Gravity. 100 years later, Einstein's Theory is STILL subject to rigorous testing to see under what circumstances it might fail and have to be discarded and replaced with a New Theory.
At no point is it ever "Settled Science", Gravity is not "Settled Science"
It is only the arrogance and fraudulent nature of the AGWCult that calls its "Science "Settled"
Physicist Michio Kaku remarked that if Einsteins Theory failed even on a single data point it would have to be discarded, why isn't AGW subject to the same standard? How can anyone even call it "science" when it's less reliable than astrology
Last edited: