Question: Why is the Administration giving control of the Internet to the United Nations. Answer: Freedom of speech on the Internet is the greatest threat to implementing worldwide Socialism. There is no reason for the federal government to defend freedom of speech on the Internet when they plan on shutting it down in this country as soon as they find a way around the First Amendment. National Security concerns looks like the opening the government has been waiting for.
Serendipitously, nobody is listening to propaganda, or product commercials, on the Internet. In that regard the government does not care who controls it.
There is one problem. Democrats refuse to acknowledge the war against Islam let alone fight it. So giving away the Internet for National Security concerns is going to be a tough sell. Realistically, the government can do anything it wants to do, but Democrats could pay a price in November. Knowledgeable handicappers are already predicting Democrats will pay dearly for HillaryCare in November. Most notably:
Add in younger Americans who grew up on the Internet under Americas control and the number of voters who blame the Democrats for the giveaway could easily rise to 80 percent.
Blaming individual Democrats up for election probably wont gain traction because the Administration is responsible. Nobody is going to tie the giveaway to a senator, or to an obscure Democrat running for a seat in the House. On the other hand, most American voters know that the Affordable Care Act belongs to every congressional Democrat. The way for Tea Party conservatives to handle the Internet giveaway is to tie the Democrat partys worldview around the necks of every Democrat where it belongs. Younger Americans will not be fooled by Democrat candidates who are sure to swear they had nothing to do with the Administrations decision. Even if an individual candidate says he or she opposes the giveaway they cannot run away from their partys global agenda.
Finally, from the governments perspective television remains the primary instrument of propaganda. Governments have controlled TV from the beginning. If you look closely at the Internet giveaway youll see that freedom of speech on the Internet is taking the hit while nothing else has changed.
Serendipitously, nobody is listening to propaganda, or product commercials, on the Internet. In that regard the government does not care who controls it.
There is one problem. Democrats refuse to acknowledge the war against Islam let alone fight it. So giving away the Internet for National Security concerns is going to be a tough sell. Realistically, the government can do anything it wants to do, but Democrats could pay a price in November. Knowledgeable handicappers are already predicting Democrats will pay dearly for HillaryCare in November. Most notably:
Add in younger Americans who grew up on the Internet under Americas control and the number of voters who blame the Democrats for the giveaway could easily rise to 80 percent.
Blaming individual Democrats up for election probably wont gain traction because the Administration is responsible. Nobody is going to tie the giveaway to a senator, or to an obscure Democrat running for a seat in the House. On the other hand, most American voters know that the Affordable Care Act belongs to every congressional Democrat. The way for Tea Party conservatives to handle the Internet giveaway is to tie the Democrat partys worldview around the necks of every Democrat where it belongs. Younger Americans will not be fooled by Democrat candidates who are sure to swear they had nothing to do with the Administrations decision. Even if an individual candidate says he or she opposes the giveaway they cannot run away from their partys global agenda.
Finally, from the governments perspective television remains the primary instrument of propaganda. Governments have controlled TV from the beginning. If you look closely at the Internet giveaway youll see that freedom of speech on the Internet is taking the hit while nothing else has changed.
