Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I cannot answer for your inability to understand the written word. This is why i ignore democrats when you want links or proof. It's a waste of time. You changed your criteria. Now you are yammering,about guilty not guilty. The issue is CONVICTION. not determination of guilt. A defendant is not convicted until there is a judgement of conviction and sentencing.Judgement is civil cases. Criminal is different try checking out this link.
After reaching a decision, the jury notifies the bailiff, who notifies the judge. All of the participants reconvene in the courtroom and the decision is announced. The announcement may be made by either the foreperson or the court clerk.
Possible verdicts in criminal cases are guilty or not guilty. In a civil suit, the jury will find for the plaintiff or the defendant. If the jury finds for the plaintiff, it will also usually set out the amount the defendant should pay the plaintiff for damages, often after a separate hearing concerning damages. The jury will also make a decision on any counterclaims that may be part of the case.
The lawyer for either party may ask that the jury be polled , although the request usually comes from the losing party. This means each juror will be asked if he or she agrees with the decision, as announced. This is to make sure that the verdict announced is the actual verdict of the jury. After the decision is read and accepted by the court, the jury is dismissed, and the trial is over.
Possible Verdicts are Guilty or Not Guilty. So try again. Link to these lawyers who say you really aren’t guilty until the sentencing.
Did you do all that yourself of troll the internetz?
Did you do all that yourself of troll the internetz?
Glad we cleared that up.Yeah. The paperwork must be complete when it is filed. That is what your link is saying.
Oh, you mean the show trials? Very common in communist countries.Tell us again why your Orange Jesus really is innocent of all charges, "counselor." lol
You keep believing that, loonOh, you mean the show trials? Very common in communist countries.
I cannot answer for your inability to understand the written word. This is why i ignore democrats when you want links or proof. It's a waste of time. You changed your criteria. Now you are yammering,about guilty not guilty. The issue is CONVICTION. not determination of guilt. A defendant is not convicted until there is a judgement of conviction and sentencing.
The rightwing deep state.No toleration of criticizing Mr. Trump as a felon is allowed. Is this the ultimate in cancel culture? Gaga order? Is this an attack on Freedom of Speech, disguised as some congressional rule preventing certain types of speech?
What slippery road has the GOP of today gone down in order to shield, or protect Mr. Trump? What kind of behavior is this?
View attachment 965858
congressional memo
On the House Floor, Republicans Gag Mentions of Trump’s Conviction
During official proceedings of the G.O.P.-controlled chamber, speaking about former President Donald J. Trump’s felony conviction has been forbidden, while disparaging President Biden and Democrats is routine.
The Republicans who now hold the majority have used those rules to impose what is essentially a gag order against talking about Mr. Trump’s hush-money payments to a porn actress or about the fact that he is a felon at all, notwithstanding that those assertions are no longer merely allegations but the basis of a jury’s guilty verdict. Doing so, they have declared, is a violation of House rules.
...
“The chair would remind members to refrain from engaging in personalities toward presumptive nominees for the office of the president,” is now a common phrase heard in the chamber after the mention of the words “Trump” and “felon.”
On one occasion, Republicans barred Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat of Massachusetts, from speaking for the rest of the day and deleted his comments from the Congressional Record after he railed against Mr. Trump and his court cases.
“When they censor any mention of Donald Trump’s criminal convictions, they are essentially trying to ban a fact,” Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, said in an interview. “I am not aware of any precedent where factual statements have been banned in our lifetime.”
![]()
On the House Floor, Republicans Gag Mentions of Trump’s Conviction
During official proceedings of the G.O.P.-controlled chamber, speaking about former President Donald J. Trump’s felony conviction has been forbidden, while disparaging President Biden and Democrats is routine.www.nytimes.com
Or, he assumed the judge, based on the verdict would enter a judgment of conviction at sentencing. Right now, the verdict of the jury is in question because if juror misconduct. If the verdict is set aside, there will be no judgment of conviction. Hence, no conviction. None of this is making any sense to you is it?So when Trump vowed to appeal the conviction he was talking out his ass?
It's old adage in politics that "signs don't vote"When I go around town the Trump signs and flags are everywhere.. it feels good to see it.
No toleration of criticizing Mr. Trump as a felon is allowed. Is this the ultimate in cancel culture? Gaga order? Is this an attack on Freedom of Speech, disguised as some congressional rule preventing certain types of speech?
What slippery road has the GOP of today gone down in order to shield, or protect Mr. Trump? What kind of behavior is this?
View attachment 965858
congressional memo
On the House Floor, Republicans Gag Mentions of Trump’s Conviction
During official proceedings of the G.O.P.-controlled chamber, speaking about former President Donald J. Trump’s felony conviction has been forbidden, while disparaging President Biden and Democrats is routine.
The Republicans who now hold the majority have used those rules to impose what is essentially a gag order against talking about Mr. Trump’s hush-money payments to a porn actress or about the fact that he is a felon at all, notwithstanding that those assertions are no longer merely allegations but the basis of a jury’s guilty verdict. Doing so, they have declared, is a violation of House rules.
...
“The chair would remind members to refrain from engaging in personalities toward presumptive nominees for the office of the president,” is now a common phrase heard in the chamber after the mention of the words “Trump” and “felon.”
On one occasion, Republicans barred Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat of Massachusetts, from speaking for the rest of the day and deleted his comments from the Congressional Record after he railed against Mr. Trump and his court cases.
“When they censor any mention of Donald Trump’s criminal convictions, they are essentially trying to ban a fact,” Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, said in an interview. “I am not aware of any precedent where factual statements have been banned in our lifetime.”
![]()
On the House Floor, Republicans Gag Mentions of Trump’s Conviction
During official proceedings of the G.O.P.-controlled chamber, speaking about former President Donald J. Trump’s felony conviction has been forbidden, while disparaging President Biden and Democrats is routine.www.nytimes.com
Or, he assumed the judge, based on the verdict would enter a judgment of conviction at sentencing. Right now, the verdict of the jury is in question because if juror misconduct. If the verdict is set aside, there will be no judgment of conviction. Hence, no conviction. None of this is making any sense to you is it?
That will not matter much. Not really. The fact that an ex president was indicted, prosecuted, and found guilty of crimes is in the history books.On July 11th, we will all learn what punishment Trump is sentenced to from his conviction.
So is the fact that only hardened democrats believe this is the result of a fair trial.That will not matter much. Not really. The fact that an ex president was indicted, prosecuted, and found guilty of crimes is in the history books.
So is the fact that only hardened democrats believe this is the result of a fair trial.