Alabama SC orders judges to stop issuing homosexuals "marriage" licenses.

[Conservative65]

You pretend that the 14th amendment gives the federal government power over something that the Constitution does not give it.

Ah, but marriage is recognized as a constitutional right. And the courts absolutely have the authority to protect the rights of citizens. Not simply the authority, but the obligation to do so.

And the States can't apply their law unequally to US citizens. If the States do, they courts again have the authority to prevent it and the obligation to do so.

However, you ignore the 10th amendment which says those powers not specifically given to the federal government belong to the States.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve rights still exist even if they aren't enumerated.

Rights trump powers, no matter how much this fact may infuriate conservatives.

Free speech, freedom of religion, and owning guns are recognized constitutional rights because they are specifically in the Constitution. Certain interpretations say marriage is one.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve Rights exist. And they don't need to be enumerated.

Your silly interpretation of 'exhaustive rights' is exactly why the 9th amendment exists. Because the founders were certain some chucklehead would assume that if a right wasn't listed in the Bill of Rights, it didn't exist.

And thank goodness they created the 9th amendment to disprove such nonsense!

Rights trump powers, chucklehead. Get used to the idea.

Get used to the fact that despite homos marrying, you will still be a freak and an abnormal individual. Those of us that matter will know and those of you than don't get it don't matter.

Those of you who 'matter' don't apparently matter much.

As our national bard says:

And the haters gonna hate, hate, hate
Baby I'm just gonna shake, shake, shake
Shake it off

Whatever level I matter, it's still more than the zero level you simple existence does.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Those of us that matter will know and those of you than don't get it don't matter.

For a person who matters, you sure lose a lot...

It's only your kind that think I lose a lot. Since you're one of those that doesn't matter, neither does your opinion.

Except my side is winning, again and again. Sucks to be you, and I know that it does since your society, your faith, and history are all leaving you in the past, where you belong. You have no real future, your ideology is nearly dead, while mine is alive and kicking, and that can't be fun for you.

 

[Skylar]

Ah, but marriage is recognized as a constitutional right. And the courts absolutely have the authority to protect the rights of citizens. Not simply the authority, but the obligation to do so.

And the States can't apply their law unequally to US citizens. If the States do, they courts again have the authority to prevent it and the obligation to do so.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve rights still exist even if they aren't enumerated.

Rights trump powers, no matter how much this fact may infuriate conservatives.

Free speech, freedom of religion, and owning guns are recognized constitutional rights because they are specifically in the Constitution. Certain interpretations say marriage is one.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve Rights exist. And they don't need to be enumerated.

Your silly interpretation of 'exhaustive rights' is exactly why the 9th amendment exists. Because the founders were certain some chucklehead would assume that if a right wasn't listed in the Bill of Rights, it didn't exist.

And thank goodness they created the 9th amendment to disprove such nonsense!

Rights trump powers, chucklehead. Get used to the idea.

Get used to the fact that despite homos marrying, you will still be a freak and an abnormal individual. Those of us that matter will know and those of you than don't get it don't matter.

Those of you who 'matter' don't apparently matter much.

As our national bard says:

And the haters gonna hate, hate, hate
Baby I'm just gonna shake, shake, shake
Shake it off

Whatever level I matter, it's still more than the zero level you simple existence does.

Sounds like we have a classic win-win situation to me. You maintain your beliefs that you're morally and practically superior to gays and their weddings. And gays without any fucks to give about your beliefs enjoy the rights and protections of marriage under the law .

Everyone wins!

 

[Conservative65]

You pretend that the 14th amendment gives the federal government power over something that the Constitution does not give it.

Ah, but marriage is recognized as a constitutional right. And the courts absolutely have the authority to protect the rights of citizens. Not simply the authority, but the obligation to do so.

And the States can't apply their law unequally to US citizens. If the States do, they courts again have the authority to prevent it and the obligation to do so.

However, you ignore the 10th amendment which says those powers not specifically given to the federal government belong to the States.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve rights still exist even if they aren't enumerated.

Rights trump powers, no matter how much this fact may infuriate conservatives.

Free speech, freedom of religion, and owning guns are recognized constitutional rights because they are specifically in the Constitution. Certain interpretations say marriage is one. However, I'm yet to see it listed like I do speech, religion, and gun ownership. Read the 10th Amendment. It trumps what you think you have a right to do faggot whether you like it or not.

Since you have lost, and are about to lose nationally, why do you bother?

Being married to someone of the opposite gender, that makes me a winner regardless of what a bunch of faggot loving people say. Even if homos marry, they're still losers because they live abnormal lives.

The real loser is your poor wife, and the abnormal life you force her to live with.

The winners are people in love getting married.

Love is a beautiful thing.

Since my wife married a male and her husband married a female, we can't be anything but normal. Also, unlike whatever you married, my wife thinks for herself.

 

[Conservative65]

You pretend that the 14th amendment gives the federal government power over something that the Constitution does not give it.

Ah, but marriage is recognized as a constitutional right. And the courts absolutely have the authority to protect the rights of citizens. Not simply the authority, but the obligation to do so.

And the States can't apply their law unequally to US citizens. If the States do, they courts again have the authority to prevent it and the obligation to do so.

However, you ignore the 10th amendment which says those powers not specifically given to the federal government belong to the States.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve rights still exist even if they aren't enumerated.

Rights trump powers, no matter how much this fact may infuriate conservatives.

Free speech, freedom of religion, and owning guns are recognized constitutional rights because they are specifically in the Constitution. Certain interpretations say marriage is one. However, I'm yet to see it listed like I do speech, religion, and gun ownership. Read the 10th Amendment. It trumps what you think you have a right to do faggot whether you like it or not.

Since you have lost, and are about to lose nationally, why do you bother?

Being married to someone of the opposite gender, that makes me a winner regardless of what a bunch of faggot loving people say. Even if homos marry, they're still losers because they live abnormal lives.

Whatever. Gays and lesbians are rightfully having their marriages recognized as being as legally valid and protected as those of straights. With the public support for gay marriage continuing to surge.

I strongly suspect than in 30 years we'll look back on people like you like we look back today on interracial marriage opponents 30 years ago.

So mob rule by the faggots and their lovers?

 

[Syriusly]

Ah, but marriage is recognized as a constitutional right. And the courts absolutely have the authority to protect the rights of citizens. Not simply the authority, but the obligation to do so.

And the States can't apply their law unequally to US citizens. If the States do, they courts again have the authority to prevent it and the obligation to do so.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve rights still exist even if they aren't enumerated.

Rights trump powers, no matter how much this fact may infuriate conservatives.

Free speech, freedom of religion, and owning guns are recognized constitutional rights because they are specifically in the Constitution. Certain interpretations say marriage is one. However, I'm yet to see it listed like I do speech, religion, and gun ownership. Read the 10th Amendment. It trumps what you think you have a right to do faggot whether you like it or not.

Since you have lost, and are about to lose nationally, why do you bother?

Being married to someone of the opposite gender, that makes me a winner regardless of what a bunch of faggot loving people say. Even if homos marry, they're still losers because they live abnormal lives.

The real loser is your poor wife, and the abnormal life you force her to live with.

The winners are people in love getting married.

Love is a beautiful thing.

Since my wife married a male and her husband married a female, we can't be anything but normal. Also, unlike whatever you married, my wife thinks for herself.

I have no reason to believe your wife is anything but a lovely human being married to an abnormal bigot.

 

[Skylar]

Ah, but marriage is recognized as a constitutional right. And the courts absolutely have the authority to protect the rights of citizens. Not simply the authority, but the obligation to do so.

And the States can't apply their law unequally to US citizens. If the States do, they courts again have the authority to prevent it and the obligation to do so.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve rights still exist even if they aren't enumerated.

Rights trump powers, no matter how much this fact may infuriate conservatives.

Free speech, freedom of religion, and owning guns are recognized constitutional rights because they are specifically in the Constitution. Certain interpretations say marriage is one. However, I'm yet to see it listed like I do speech, religion, and gun ownership. Read the 10th Amendment. It trumps what you think you have a right to do faggot whether you like it or not.

Since you have lost, and are about to lose nationally, why do you bother?

Being married to someone of the opposite gender, that makes me a winner regardless of what a bunch of faggot loving people say. Even if homos marry, they're still losers because they live abnormal lives.

Whatever. Gays and lesbians are rightfully having their marriages recognized as being as legally valid and protected as those of straights. With the public support for gay marriage continuing to surge.

I strongly suspect than in 30 years we'll look back on people like you like we look back today on interracial marriage opponents 30 years ago.

So mob rule by the faggots and their lovers?

More accurately, with the slow attrition of time softening the harder edges of bigotry. With our law and public support meeting nicely.

 

[Conservative65]

You pretend that the 14th amendment gives the federal government power over something that the Constitution does not give it.

Ah, but marriage is recognized as a constitutional right. And the courts absolutely have the authority to protect the rights of citizens. Not simply the authority, but the obligation to do so.

And the States can't apply their law unequally to US citizens. If the States do, they courts again have the authority to prevent it and the obligation to do so.

However, you ignore the 10th amendment which says those powers not specifically given to the federal government belong to the States.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve rights still exist even if they aren't enumerated.

Rights trump powers, no matter how much this fact may infuriate conservatives.

Free speech, freedom of religion, and owning guns are recognized constitutional rights because they are specifically in the Constitution. Certain interpretations say marriage is one.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve Rights exist. And they don't need to be enumerated.

Your silly interpretation of 'exhaustive rights' is exactly why the 9th amendment exists. Because the founders were certain some chucklehead would assume that if a right wasn't listed in the Bill of Rights, it didn't exist.

And thank goodness they created the 9th amendment to disprove such nonsense!

Rights trump powers, chucklehead. Get used to the idea.

Get used to the fact that despite homos marrying, you will still be a freak and an abnormal individual.

Says you, citing you. And I genuinely don't care what your personal opinion is. I'm concerned with legal rights.

You're concerned about a personal agenda.

 

[Syriusly]

Ah, but marriage is recognized as a constitutional right. And the courts absolutely have the authority to protect the rights of citizens. Not simply the authority, but the obligation to do so.

And the States can't apply their law unequally to US citizens. If the States do, they courts again have the authority to prevent it and the obligation to do so.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve rights still exist even if they aren't enumerated.

Rights trump powers, no matter how much this fact may infuriate conservatives.

Free speech, freedom of religion, and owning guns are recognized constitutional rights because they are specifically in the Constitution. Certain interpretations say marriage is one. However, I'm yet to see it listed like I do speech, religion, and gun ownership. Read the 10th Amendment. It trumps what you think you have a right to do faggot whether you like it or not.

Since you have lost, and are about to lose nationally, why do you bother?

Being married to someone of the opposite gender, that makes me a winner regardless of what a bunch of faggot loving people say. Even if homos marry, they're still losers because they live abnormal lives.

Whatever. Gays and lesbians are rightfully having their marriages recognized as being as legally valid and protected as those of straights. With the public support for gay marriage continuing to surge.

I strongly suspect than in 30 years we'll look back on people like you like we look back today on interracial marriage opponents 30 years ago.

So mob rule by the faggots and their lovers?

Clearly reading comprehension wasn't one of your strengths in school.

 

[Syriusly]

Ah, but marriage is recognized as a constitutional right. And the courts absolutely have the authority to protect the rights of citizens. Not simply the authority, but the obligation to do so.

And the States can't apply their law unequally to US citizens. If the States do, they courts again have the authority to prevent it and the obligation to do so.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve rights still exist even if they aren't enumerated.

Rights trump powers, no matter how much this fact may infuriate conservatives.

Free speech, freedom of religion, and owning guns are recognized constitutional rights because they are specifically in the Constitution. Certain interpretations say marriage is one.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve Rights exist. And they don't need to be enumerated.

Your silly interpretation of 'exhaustive rights' is exactly why the 9th amendment exists. Because the founders were certain some chucklehead would assume that if a right wasn't listed in the Bill of Rights, it didn't exist.

And thank goodness they created the 9th amendment to disprove such nonsense!

Rights trump powers, chucklehead. Get used to the idea.

Get used to the fact that despite homos marrying, you will still be a freak and an abnormal individual. Those of us that matter will know and those of you than don't get it don't matter.

Those of you who 'matter' don't apparently matter much.

As our national bard says:

And the haters gonna hate, hate, hate
Baby I'm just gonna shake, shake, shake
Shake it off

Whatever level I matter, it's still more than the zero level you simple existence does.

And the haters gonna hate, hate, hate
Baby I'm just gonna shake, shake, shake
Shake it off

 

[Skylar]

Ah, but marriage is recognized as a constitutional right. And the courts absolutely have the authority to protect the rights of citizens. Not simply the authority, but the obligation to do so.

And the States can't apply their law unequally to US citizens. If the States do, they courts again have the authority to prevent it and the obligation to do so.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve rights still exist even if they aren't enumerated.

Rights trump powers, no matter how much this fact may infuriate conservatives.

Free speech, freedom of religion, and owning guns are recognized constitutional rights because they are specifically in the Constitution. Certain interpretations say marriage is one.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve Rights exist. And they don't need to be enumerated.

Your silly interpretation of 'exhaustive rights' is exactly why the 9th amendment exists. Because the founders were certain some chucklehead would assume that if a right wasn't listed in the Bill of Rights, it didn't exist.

And thank goodness they created the 9th amendment to disprove such nonsense!

Rights trump powers, chucklehead. Get used to the idea.

Get used to the fact that despite homos marrying, you will still be a freak and an abnormal individual.

Says you, citing you. And I genuinely don't care what your personal opinion is. I'm concerned with legal rights.

You're concerned about a personal agenda.

I've got no horse in the race. As gay marriage doesn't effect me. Rights and equal protections do. Which is why I support gay marriage.

 

[Conservative65]

Free speech, freedom of religion, and owning guns are recognized constitutional rights because they are specifically in the Constitution. Certain interpretations say marriage is one. However, I'm yet to see it listed like I do speech, religion, and gun ownership. Read the 10th Amendment. It trumps what you think you have a right to do faggot whether you like it or not.

Since you have lost, and are about to lose nationally, why do you bother?

Being married to someone of the opposite gender, that makes me a winner regardless of what a bunch of faggot loving people say. Even if homos marry, they're still losers because they live abnormal lives.

Whatever. Gays and lesbians are rightfully having their marriages recognized as being as legally valid and protected as those of straights. With the public support for gay marriage continuing to surge.

I strongly suspect than in 30 years we'll look back on people like you like we look back today on interracial marriage opponents 30 years ago.

So mob rule by the faggots and their lovers?

Clearly reading comprehension wasn't one of your strengths in school.

Clearly you on consider it mob rule when it comes from a side with which you disagree. Typical. You call opposition to same sex marriage mob rule but are perfectly fine with what you believe being done in the same manner you say is wrong.

Faggots don't want equality. They want acceptance of their perverted, abnormal lifestyle. It won't happen here nor with anyone I can educate on the difference between normal male/female relationships and freaks of nature that make abnormal choices in life. Best believe my kids already know as do the kids of many people I know. We aren't going anywhere despite your best efforts.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Since you have lost, and are about to lose nationally, why do you bother?

Being married to someone of the opposite gender, that makes me a winner regardless of what a bunch of faggot loving people say. Even if homos marry, they're still losers because they live abnormal lives.

Whatever. Gays and lesbians are rightfully having their marriages recognized as being as legally valid and protected as those of straights. With the public support for gay marriage continuing to surge.

I strongly suspect than in 30 years we'll look back on people like you like we look back today on interracial marriage opponents 30 years ago.

So mob rule by the faggots and their lovers?

Clearly reading comprehension wasn't one of your strengths in school.

Clearly you on consider it mob rule when it comes from a side with which you disagree. Typical. You call opposition to same sex marriage mob rule but are perfectly fine with what you believe being done in the same manner you say is wrong.

Faggots don't want equality. They want acceptance of their perverted, abnormal lifestyle. It won't happen here nor with anyone I can educate on the difference between normal male/female relationships and freaks of nature that make abnormal choices in life. Best believe my kids already know as do the kids of many people I know. We aren't going anywhere despite your best efforts.

You are dying breed, and we are perfectly happy to see you happily on your way.

 

[Conservative65]

Free speech, freedom of religion, and owning guns are recognized constitutional rights because they are specifically in the Constitution. Certain interpretations say marriage is one.

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve Rights exist. And they don't need to be enumerated.

Your silly interpretation of 'exhaustive rights' is exactly why the 9th amendment exists. Because the founders were certain some chucklehead would assume that if a right wasn't listed in the Bill of Rights, it didn't exist.

And thank goodness they created the 9th amendment to disprove such nonsense!

Rights trump powers, chucklehead. Get used to the idea.

Get used to the fact that despite homos marrying, you will still be a freak and an abnormal individual.

Says you, citing you. And I genuinely don't care what your personal opinion is. I'm concerned with legal rights.

You're concerned about a personal agenda.

I've got no horse in the race. As gay marriage doesn't effect me. Rights and equal protections do. Which is why I support gay marriage.

Yet you oppose other marriages that fit the same concept of equality you say should exist for same sex marriages. You've made it clear that you have no opinion on close relatives marrying because you don't have much knowledge of the details. You don't need the details. All you need to know is that two close relatives that are of the age of consent want to get married. That's your arugmen for faggots. Therefore, if you oppose those or avoid supporting them, you're a hypocrite.

I don't personally support close relatives marrying. However, if you support equal rights, you better damn well do it for all situations or any argument you have for the faggots is dismissed much like your simple existence already has.

 

[Skylar]

Since you have lost, and are about to lose nationally, why do you bother?

Being married to someone of the opposite gender, that makes me a winner regardless of what a bunch of faggot loving people say. Even if homos marry, they're still losers because they live abnormal lives.

Whatever. Gays and lesbians are rightfully having their marriages recognized as being as legally valid and protected as those of straights. With the public support for gay marriage continuing to surge.

I strongly suspect than in 30 years we'll look back on people like you like we look back today on interracial marriage opponents 30 years ago.

So mob rule by the faggots and their lovers?

Clearly reading comprehension wasn't one of your strengths in school.

Clearly you on consider it mob rule when it comes from a side with which you disagree. Typical. You call opposition to same sex marriage mob rule but are perfectly fine with what you believe being done in the same manner you say is wrong.

I support extending freedoms. You're advocating restricting them. Those are opposites. As for 'mob rule', we're arguing that individual rights should be protected. Which is the exact opposite of mob rule.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Faggots don't want equality. They want acceptance of their perverted, abnormal lifestyle. It won't happen here nor with anyone I can educate on the difference between normal male/female relationships and freaks of nature that make abnormal choices in life. Best believe my kids already know as do the kids of many people I know. We aren't going anywhere despite your best efforts.

Hate takes lots of energy. And works best when the object of your hatred is far away. The reason you're losing this debate is lots of folks know gays and lesbians. And they're just folks. Your description doesn't match the experience of most people.

Given your vitriol contradicted by their experience....most folks are gonna go with their experience.

 

[Skylar]

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve Rights exist. And they don't need to be enumerated.

Your silly interpretation of 'exhaustive rights' is exactly why the 9th amendment exists. Because the founders were certain some chucklehead would assume that if a right wasn't listed in the Bill of Rights, it didn't exist.

And thank goodness they created the 9th amendment to disprove such nonsense!

Rights trump powers, chucklehead. Get used to the idea.

Get used to the fact that despite homos marrying, you will still be a freak and an abnormal individual.

Says you, citing you. And I genuinely don't care what your personal opinion is. I'm concerned with legal rights.

You're concerned about a personal agenda.

I've got no horse in the race. As gay marriage doesn't effect me. Rights and equal protections do. Which is why I support gay marriage.

Yet you oppose other marriages that fit the same concept of equality you say should exist for same sex marriages. You've made it clear that you have no opinion on close relatives marrying because you don't have much knowledge of the details. You don't need the details. All you need to know is that two close relatives that are of the age of consent want to get married. That's your arugmen for faggots. Therefore, if you oppose those or avoid supporting them, you're a hypocrite.

Says you. Unlike you, I don't form opinions before I have information. You insist that no information is necessary. And you're obviously wrong. On marriage between siblings, I don't really have an opinion.

That's not 'opposition'. No matter how you try to spin it. And you clearly don't understand what 'hypocrisy' means. As you're using the term as a generic pejorative.

I don't personally support close relatives marrying.

Honestly, I don't care. Your personal opinion has no value to me. I don't consider you particularly insightful, you don't apply much reason or logic to your arguments, and you've made it clear that you don't think you need any information to form an opinion.

I don't respect any of that. So believe as you wish. Really, no one gives a shit. As the process that formed your perspective is, by your own admission, ignorant.

No thank you.

 

[Syriusly]

Since you have lost, and are about to lose nationally, why do you bother?

Being married to someone of the opposite gender, that makes me a winner regardless of what a bunch of faggot loving people say. Even if homos marry, they're still losers because they live abnormal lives.

Whatever. Gays and lesbians are rightfully having their marriages recognized as being as legally valid and protected as those of straights. With the public support for gay marriage continuing to surge.

I strongly suspect than in 30 years we'll look back on people like you like we look back today on interracial marriage opponents 30 years ago.

So mob rule by the faggots and their lovers?

Clearly reading comprehension wasn't one of your strengths in school.

Clearly you on consider it mob rule when it comes from a side with which you disagree. Typical. You call opposition to same sex marriage mob rule .

When have I ever called opposition to same sex marriage 'mob rule'?

 

[Syriusly]

Read the 9th amendment. Reserve Rights exist. And they don't need to be enumerated.

Your silly interpretation of 'exhaustive rights' is exactly why the 9th amendment exists. Because the founders were certain some chucklehead would assume that if a right wasn't listed in the Bill of Rights, it didn't exist.

And thank goodness they created the 9th amendment to disprove such nonsense!

Rights trump powers, chucklehead. Get used to the idea.

Get used to the fact that despite homos marrying, you will still be a freak and an abnormal individual.

Says you, citing you. And I genuinely don't care what your personal opinion is. I'm concerned with legal rights.

You're concerned about a personal agenda.

I've got no horse in the race. As gay marriage doesn't effect me. Rights and equal protections do. Which is why I support gay marriage.

I don't personally support close relatives marrying. However, if you support equal rights, you better damn well do it for all situations or any argument you have for the faggots is dismissed much like your simple existence already has.

Do you support mixed race marriage as a legal right?

If you do, you better damn well support the right for incestuous marriage and people marrying goats- because according to your logic- if we recognize equal rights for anybody- then that means of course people must be able to marry their mothers.

 

[Skylar]

Being married to someone of the opposite gender, that makes me a winner regardless of what a bunch of faggot loving people say. Even if homos marry, they're still losers because they live abnormal lives.

Whatever. Gays and lesbians are rightfully having their marriages recognized as being as legally valid and protected as those of straights. With the public support for gay marriage continuing to surge.

I strongly suspect than in 30 years we'll look back on people like you like we look back today on interracial marriage opponents 30 years ago.

So mob rule by the faggots and their lovers?

Clearly reading comprehension wasn't one of your strengths in school.

Clearly you on consider it mob rule when it comes from a side with which you disagree. Typical. You call opposition to same sex marriage mob rule .

When have I ever called opposition to same sex marriage 'mob rule'?

He's monologuing. I don't think we actually need to be here for this. As his comments are generic, even if his pronouns aren't.

 

[James Everett]

You still have been unable to explain what the federal system is, or how it is in operation today: why? Because you cannot because such doesn't exist. Marriage is not denied to those who meet the criteria of a marriage contract, which is actin tract between a man and a woman, not a man and a man. No man and woman are being denied the equal protection to marry aside from incest. Your 24th argument is a fiction in reality, but then you exist in fiction as I have shown.

The Federal system exists- it is.

Marriage is denied to Americans according to multiple Federal judges.

And the Supreme Court will decide whether they are right.

And no one will care that you don't think any of that exists.

Funny, you say the federal system still exists, yet you cannot define it or what a federal system is or how it operates. Not suprising since you do not even understand what a marriage is. Again, I challenge you to explain the federal system. I will help you with a hint. You may read the "federalist" #39 and 62 and gain some insight, however I doubt you actually care to learn anything because it does not concern left v right.