Alpine glaciers 50% gone by 2050 no matter what

[EvilCat Breath]

"one reason so many hundreds of scientists are persuaded that the sky is falling is that they are paid handsomely to do so."

Follow the (Climate Change) Money

The first iron rule of American politics is: Follow the money. This explains, oh, about 80 percent of what goes on in Washington. Shortly after the latest Chicken Little climate change report was published last month, I noted on CNN that one reason so many hundreds of scientists are persuaded...

www.heritage.org

This is the essence of climate change.

 

[Crick]

The scientists aren't deluded. They get paid to espouse the global warming hoax. You didn't think they believed it, did you?

To answer your question, scientists are paid to be deceptive. You are deluded.

Do you REALLY think all the world's climate scientists could have been running a huge deception for, what, forty years now, with very, very close to 100% cooperation by over ten thousand well-educated individuals from every nation on the planet, producing completely coherent science, who would be putting their entire careers at risk without ever being caught and without a single scientist ever confessing to the scheme? Does that REALLY seem possible to you?

And you did not answer my question about the fossil fuel industy: Would you go so far as to admit that the fossil fuel industries have some motivation to work against the AGW mitigation that will eventually bring their business to a complete end?

 

[Crick]

"one reason so many hundreds of scientists are persuaded that the sky is falling is that they are paid handsomely to do so."

Follow the (Climate Change) Money

The first iron rule of American politics is: Follow the money. This explains, oh, about 80 percent of what goes on in Washington. Shortly after the latest Chicken Little climate change report was published last month, I noted on CNN that one reason so many hundreds of scientists are persuaded...

www.heritage.org

This is the essence of climate change.

Is the fossil fuel industry a non-profit entity?

What do you think happened to the number of active climate scientists between 1993 and 2014?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Do you REALLY think all the world's climate scientists could have been running a huge deception for, what, forty years now, with very, very close to 100% cooperation by over ten thousand well-educated individuals from every nation on the planet without ever being caught and without a single scientist ever confessing to the scheme? Does that REALLY seem possible to you?

And you did not answer my question about the fossil fuel industy: Would you go so far as to admit that the fossil fuel industries have some motivation to work against AGW mitigation that will eventually bring their business to a complete end?

Before there was the global warming hoax, there was the global cooling hoax so climate hoaxing has been going on for well over 40s years. The fossil fuel industries don't need any manufactured garbage theory. Our civilization as presently constituted would end without them. Which is just what UN warmest want. I fully support the fossil fuel industries.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Is the fossil fuel industry a non-profit entity?

What do you think happened to the number of activeientists climate scientists between 1993 and 2014?

The fossil fuel industry should make as much money as it can. After all climate scientists sell themselves out for money.

 

[Crick]

Before there was the global warming hoax, there was the global cooling hoax so climate hoaxing has been going on for well over 40s years. The fossil fuel industries don't need any manufactured garbage theory. Our civilization as presently constituted would end without them. Which is just what UN warmest want. I fully support the fossil fuel industries.

You're still not answering my question. Again, would you go so far as to admit that the fossil fuel industry has some motivation to act against the AGW mitigation that will eventually bring their business to an end?

 

[Crick]

The fossil fuel industry should make as much money as it can. After all climate scientists sell themselves out for money.

That the money governments spend for climate research should have increased significantly over the last 30 years isn't even evidence suggesting scientists are selling themselves out. Enormously more science with enormously more scope (and therefore cost) is being conducted by enormously more scientists.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You're still not answering my question. Again, would you go so far as to admit that the fossil fuel industry has some motivation to act against the AGW mitigation that will eventually bring their business to an end?

I have answered your question about five times already.

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Now please admit that paying scientists to support the global warming hoax is some inducement to support crackpot theories.

Your efforts at education are failing miserably.

 

[Crick]

I have answered your question about five times already.

You have not answered it once.

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

So, you are saying that the fossil fuel industry has no motivation to act against the AGW mitigation efforts that will eventually end their business. That seems like a completely rational position. Would that be because they agree with the conclusions of the world's climate scientists that GHG emissions must be ended ASAP? Would that be because they simply do not care what happens with their investments, their jobs, their facilities? Would that be because the industry is functionally autistic? Or would that be because you know precisely where your admission of the truth would lead the conversation?

Now please admit that paying scientists to support the global warming hoax is some inducement to support crackpot theories.

There is no hoax. No one is paying climate scientists to support crackpot theories. The reason that the vast majority of studies conclude that the Earth is warming due to the greenhouse effect acting on human GHG emissions is the same reason that the vast majority of studies find that disease is caused by antigens, that gravity is accurately described by general relativity and that cigarettes cause cancer.

Your efforts at education are failing miserably.

Among those who reject the facts and the conclusions of mainstream science out of ignorance and political bias, yes they do.

 

[ding]

Alpine glaciers will lose half of their volume by 2050 no matter what humans do (Earth.com)

Alpine glaciers are set to lose at least a third of their volume by 2050, regardless of any immediate halt in global warming, according to scientists from t...

l.smartnews.com

More of the world's limited fresh water poured into the sea.

Happens every interglacial period. Nothing new here at all.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Do you REALLY think all the world's climate scientists could have been running a huge deception for, what, forty years now, with very, very close to 100% cooperation by over ten thousand well-educated individuals from every nation on the planet, producing completely coherent science, who would be putting their entire careers at risk without ever being caught and without a single scientist ever confessing to the scheme? Does that REALLY seem possible to you?

And you did not answer my question about the fossil fuel industy: Would you go so far as to admit that the fossil fuel industries have some motivation to work against the AGW mitigation that will eventually bring their business to a complete end?

Anyone who goes off the reservation gets canceled.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You have not answered it once.

So, you are saying that the fossil fuel industry has no motivation to act against the AGW mitigation efforts that will eventually end their business. That seems like a completely rational position. Would that be because they agree with the conclusions of the world's climate scientists that GHG emissions must be ended ASAP? Would that be because they simply do not care what happens with their investments, their jobs, their facilities? Would that be because the industry is functionally autistic? Or would that be because you know precisely where your admission of the truth would lead the conversation?

There is no hoax. No one is paying climate scientists to support crackpot theories. The reason that the vast majority of studies conclude that the Earth is warming due to the greenhouse effect acting on human GHG emissions is the same reason that the vast majority of studies find that disease is caused by antigens, that gravity is accurately described by general relativity and that cigarettes cause cancer.

Among those who reject the facts and the conclusions of mainstream science out of ignorance and political bias, yes they do.

Nothing you have said moves the needle. Global warming is still a hoax and the scientists who support this nuttiness are paid to do so.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Hoax

Putting the 'con' in consensus; Not only is there no 97 per cent consensus among climate scientists, many misunderstand core issues: op-ed

In the lead-up to the Paris climate summit, massive activist pressure is on all governments, especially Canada’s, to fall in line with the global warming agenda and accept emission targets that could seriously harm our economy.

www.fraserinstitute.org

 

[Lastamender]

Alpine glaciers will lose half of their volume by 2050 no matter what humans do (Earth.com)

Alpine glaciers are set to lose at least a third of their volume by 2050, regardless of any immediate halt in global warming, according to scientists from t...

l.smartnews.com

More of the world's limited fresh water poured into the sea.

Does Al Gore know? I think he thinks they are gone.

 

[ding]

Hoax

Putting the 'con' in consensus; Not only is there no 97 per cent consensus among climate scientists, many misunderstand core issues: op-ed

In the lead-up to the Paris climate summit, massive activist pressure is on all governments, especially Canada’s, to fall in line with the global warming agenda and accept emission targets that could seriously harm our economy.

www.fraserinstitute.org

It's a concerted political effort to squelch honest debate.

 

[progressive hunter]

The issue is in them being partially gone before then. It's settled science regardless of the denial that's become the property of the fringe.

This board can be the safest haven they will find from now on.

science by definition is never settled,,

to date you chicken littles have a 100% failure rate on your predictions,,

 

[ding]

The issue is in them being partially gone before then. It's settled science regardless of the denial that's become the property of the fringe.

This board can be the safest haven they will find from now on.

Considering the GHG of CO2 per doubling of CO2 is only 1C and the predicted feedback is 3.5C from that 1C, it's hardly settled at all. The 1C is based on physics. The 3.5C is based upon flawed computer modeling.

 

[Crick]

Does Al Gore know? I think he thinks they are gone.

I bet he does. Why don't you ask him?

 

[Crick]

Nothing you have said moves the needle. Global warming is still a hoax and the scientists who support this nuttiness are paid to do so.

Global warming is an established fact and the scientists researching the topic are being paid to research the topic.

 

[progressive hunter]

Global warming is an established fact and the scientists researching the topic are being paid to research the topic.

there are no established facts in science,, just theories,,