Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

[progressive hunter]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

You know all about the ongoing and very real and well documented Big Tech Purge that the media pretends doesn’t exist. And about Amazon’s removal of a book about the transgender movemen…

therightscoop.com

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

What party is Amazon and what was their candidates name again?

Dem Party, Biden.....

Bezo's is one of those billionaires the "capitalists" worship.

I have no problem with the fact he made a successful business, nor the problem of wanting to be the best...the problem is the DNC that he has given a large amount of money too, that is using their Govt powers to help him shut down competition and in return he is censoring other ideas that might challenge the left's narrative......very Fascist relationship between the left and Amazon

He can't give a large amount of money to the DNC.

true...large amounts of money to the DNC CAUSES, as well as spreading propaganda on his paper, to do what I suggested.

Good catch....I should have been more clearer

Trump picks Jerome Powell to succeed Yellen as Fed chair

Democrat Chides Fed’s Powell Over Attendance at Bezos Party

So a Dem gave a Fed Chair a hard time about going to a Washington Party hosted by Amazon? Ok.......is that suppose to somehow counter the fact that Bezo's supports ovewhelming Dems and their causes? and they make legislation that benefits his business?

This was the big party he had after the famous Alfalfa Club dinner thing....most all Washington insiders attend...Obama spoke there.

Bill Gates also attended the party, as well as other left winger donors like Jamie Dimon, Steven Case, maybe she was made she wasn't invited

They all have followed the policies that benefit Bezo's.

whats that got to do with the topic??

 

[progressive hunter]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

I will remember you said that,,

and its not that they can choose its what they choose and why they did it thats the issue,,

 

[Man of Ethics]

Hopefully, a Conservative book dealer will take the opportunity to make a good profit.

 

[Man of Ethics]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

 

[Coyote]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

 

[progressive hunter]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

I bet if I took time to go back and look you would have been one of the biggest voices demanding the bakers provide the cake for the gay couple,,,


so once again your lies are just pathetic,,,

 

[22lcidw]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

It wasn't the people who left the companies. The companies left the people as they became Progressive Socialist agendists.

 

[Coyote]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

I bet if I took time to go back and look you would have been one of the biggest voices demanding the bakers provide the cake for the gay couple,,,


so once again your lies are just pathetic,,,

Maybe. Or Maybe not.

You make or provide a product. Laws say you have to provide equal access to the product.

Laws don't say you can't set limitations on the product. You can't force a baker to make a pornographic gay wedding cake if it doesn't ordinarily do so. Or a platform to host content against it's terms of service.

 

[progressive hunter]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

I bet if I took time to go back and look you would have been one of the biggest voices demanding the bakers provide the cake for the gay couple,,,


so once again your lies are just pathetic,,,

Maybe. Or Maybe not.

You make or provide a product. Laws say you have to provide equal access to the product.

Laws don't say you can't set limitations on the product. You can't force a baker to make a pornographic gay wedding cake if it doesn't ordinarily do so. Or a platform to host content against it's terms of service.

but the baker didnt offer a gay cake,,

your play on words is noted and just more proof youre a lyin skank,,

 

[Coyote]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

I will remember you said that,,

and its not that they can choose its what they choose and why they did it thats the issue,,

Sure. Just remember the key words here:
on what they will or won't sell...

Not WHO they will or won't sell to.

Bakers making wedding cakes (in areas with public accommodation laws) can't discriminate on who they provide a product to.

Platforms can't discriminate on who they provide a product to.

Both can set rules of what they will or will not provide as a product.

Do you agree or disagree? Or is it only Bakers that are free and Platforms that are not?

 

[Coyote]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

I bet if I took time to go back and look you would have been one of the biggest voices demanding the bakers provide the cake for the gay couple,,,


so once again your lies are just pathetic,,,

Maybe. Or Maybe not.

You make or provide a product. Laws say you have to provide equal access to the product.

Laws don't say you can't set limitations on the product. You can't force a baker to make a pornographic gay wedding cake if it doesn't ordinarily do so. Or a platform to host content against it's terms of service.

but the baker didnt offer a gay cake,,

your play on words is noted and just more proof youre a lyin skank,,

Who said he did? It's just a wedding cake. Something he customarily provides.

You're hypocrisy is duly noted, without vulgarity.

 

[progressive hunter]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

I bet if I took time to go back and look you would have been one of the biggest voices demanding the bakers provide the cake for the gay couple,,,


so once again your lies are just pathetic,,,

Maybe. Or Maybe not.

You make or provide a product. Laws say you have to provide equal access to the product.

Laws don't say you can't set limitations on the product. You can't force a baker to make a pornographic gay wedding cake if it doesn't ordinarily do so. Or a platform to host content against it's terms of service.

but the baker didnt offer a gay cake,,

your play on words is noted and just more proof youre a lyin skank,,

Who said he did? It's just a wedding cake. Something he customarily provides.

You're hypocrisy is duly noted, without vulgarity.

they were free to purchase any wedding cake they have sold for yrs,, what they wanted was something theyve never sold before,,,

the only hypocrisy is yours,, you know damn good and well youre lying and so do we,,,

 

[Coyote]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

I bet if I took time to go back and look you would have been one of the biggest voices demanding the bakers provide the cake for the gay couple,,,


so once again your lies are just pathetic,,,

Maybe. Or Maybe not.

You make or provide a product. Laws say you have to provide equal access to the product.

Laws don't say you can't set limitations on the product. You can't force a baker to make a pornographic gay wedding cake if it doesn't ordinarily do so. Or a platform to host content against it's terms of service.

but the baker didnt offer a gay cake,,

your play on words is noted and just more proof youre a lyin skank,,

Who said he did? It's just a wedding cake. Something he customarily provides.

You're hypocrisy is duly noted, without vulgarity.

they were free to purchase any wedding cake they have sold for yrs,, what they wanted was something theyve never sold before,,,

the only hypocrisy is yours,, you know damn good and well youre lying and so do we,,,

What specifically did they want that had never been sold?

And again, your hypocrisy is duly noted since you clearly do not apply the same standards to platforms.

 

[progressive hunter]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

I bet if I took time to go back and look you would have been one of the biggest voices demanding the bakers provide the cake for the gay couple,,,


so once again your lies are just pathetic,,,

Maybe. Or Maybe not.

You make or provide a product. Laws say you have to provide equal access to the product.

Laws don't say you can't set limitations on the product. You can't force a baker to make a pornographic gay wedding cake if it doesn't ordinarily do so. Or a platform to host content against it's terms of service.

but the baker didnt offer a gay cake,,

your play on words is noted and just more proof youre a lyin skank,,

Who said he did? It's just a wedding cake. Something he customarily provides.

You're hypocrisy is duly noted, without vulgarity.

they were free to purchase any wedding cake they have sold for yrs,, what they wanted was something theyve never sold before,,,

the only hypocrisy is yours,, you know damn good and well youre lying and so do we,,,

What specifically did they want that had never been sold?

And again, your hypocrisy is duly noted since you clearly do not apply the same standards to platforms.

you even asking that question shows your nothing but a lying skank,,

you know damn good and well what the issue was,,,

 

[Dadoalex]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

You know all about the ongoing and very real and well documented Big Tech Purge that the media pretends doesn’t exist. And about Amazon’s removal of a book about the transgender movemen…

therightscoop.com

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

Amazon has every right to determine what will and will not be sold in their store. After all, I don't see them selling Obama's books on Trump's site.

Maybe stop with the racism, sexism, misogyny and Amazon will sell their books. But then, if they did that they wouldn't have a book to sell would they?

 

[HenryBHough]

They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.

We despise hate books.

Except the ones the left publishes.

Do you hate violence in the same way? With the same exemption?

Burned any books lately?

 

[progressive hunter]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

You know all about the ongoing and very real and well documented Big Tech Purge that the media pretends doesn’t exist. And about Amazon’s removal of a book about the transgender movemen…

therightscoop.com

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

Amazon has every right to determine what will and will not be sold in their store. After all, I don't see them selling Obama's books on Trump's site.

Maybe stop with the racism, sexism, misogyny and Amazon will sell their books. But then, if they did that they wouldn't have a book to sell would they?

if the rules were applied equally across the board they wouldnt have any books to sell,, its they are singling out a specific group/ideology,,,

but thanks for stopping by,,

 

[beagle9]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

You know all about the ongoing and very real and well documented Big Tech Purge that the media pretends doesn’t exist. And about Amazon’s removal of a book about the transgender movemen…

therightscoop.com

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

They best get the hell out of politic's, because I order a good bit through them, but I can stop on a dime. Try me Amazon.

 

[Coyote]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

I bet if I took time to go back and look you would have been one of the biggest voices demanding the bakers provide the cake for the gay couple,,,


so once again your lies are just pathetic,,,

Maybe. Or Maybe not.

You make or provide a product. Laws say you have to provide equal access to the product.

Laws don't say you can't set limitations on the product. You can't force a baker to make a pornographic gay wedding cake if it doesn't ordinarily do so. Or a platform to host content against it's terms of service.

but the baker didnt offer a gay cake,,

your play on words is noted and just more proof youre a lyin skank,,

Who said he did? It's just a wedding cake. Something he customarily provides.

You're hypocrisy is duly noted, without vulgarity.

they were free to purchase any wedding cake they have sold for yrs,, what they wanted was something theyve never sold before,,,

the only hypocrisy is yours,, you know damn good and well youre lying and so do we,,,

What specifically did they want that had never been sold?

And again, your hypocrisy is duly noted since you clearly do not apply the same standards to platforms.

you even asking that question shows your nothing but a lying skank,,

you know damn good and well what the issue was,,,

The baker makes custom wedding cakes routinely. That's part of his business. He does not routinely make custom pornographic cakes (used just as an example). If he is refusing to make a custom cake based solely on the couple being same sex then that is violating Colorado's public accommodation law. Yes or no?

So (you lying skank since you can't seem to avoid the gutter) - why don't YOU apply the same standards to platforms? Can't do that can you? Because it doesn't fit your way wah-wah's conservative victimization syndrome.

 

[progressive hunter]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

You know all about the ongoing and very real and well documented Big Tech Purge that the media pretends doesn’t exist. And about Amazon’s removal of a book about the transgender movemen…

therightscoop.com

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

They best get the hell out of politic's, because I order a good bit through them, but I can stop on a dime. Try me Amazon.

I've pretty much stopped,, and look long and hard for other options before I do order from them,,,