America's national debt

Captain Caveman

Platinum Member
Jun 14, 2020
11,725
6,448
938
England
Should America, and no doubt other countries, bring a law in that the current President/Prime Minister/party etc.. must leave office with balanced books, meaning, they can't add to the current debt level. But from the start due to the level of national debt, the debt must decrease X amount each year till eventually all debt is wiped.

So in America's case, the debt has to fall $1tr a year, so that's 4 trillion per president term.

The only exception is the cost of a war can be added.
 
Should America, and no doubt other countries, bring a law in that the current President/Prime Minister/party etc.. must leave office with balanced books, meaning, they can't add to the current debt level. But from the start due to the level of national debt, the debt must decrease X amount each year till eventually all debt is wiped.

So in America's case, the debt has to fall $1tr a year, so that's 4 trillion per president term.

The only exception is the cost of a war can be added.

Yes they should.

But they won't because the people will not vote in to office those that might do such a thing.
 
It is a National Security threat IMO, which means it is a threat to all of the West. If only Trump would have held the line his first year, he shut down the govt but couldn't take the heat even though the Dem supporters were hurt far more.
 
Last edited:
It is a National Security threat IMO, wuich means it is a threat to all of the West. If only Trump would have held the line his first year, he shut down the govt but couldn't take the heat even though the Dem supporters were hurt far more.

He shut down the Govt because the Dems would not give him even more money for his wall.

He never shut down the Govt to cut spending.

He summitted the 4 largest budget request in this history of the country at the time.

He did not run on spending less, in fact bragged about being the king of debt.
 
Should America, and no doubt other countries, bring a law in that the current President/Prime Minister/party etc.. must leave office with balanced books, meaning, they can't add to the current debt level. But from the start due to the level of national debt, the debt must decrease X amount each year till eventually all debt is wiped.

So in America's case, the debt has to fall $1tr a year, so that's 4 trillion per president term.

The only exception is the cost of a war can be added.
May be best to define war. Would that include Biden sending trillions to Ukraine? Some of these clowns would start a new war daily to increase spending.
 
Should America, and no doubt other countries, bring a law in that the current President/Prime Minister/party etc.. must leave office with balanced books, meaning, they can't add to the current debt level. But from the start due to the level of national debt, the debt must decrease X amount each year till eventually all debt is wiped.

So in America's case, the debt has to fall $1tr a year, so that's 4 trillion per president term.

The only exception is the cost of a war can be added.
The president is not in charge of the nation's purse strings...But you being a foreigner I doubt you understand how it works here.
 
He shut down the Govt because the Dems would not give him even more money for his wall.



.
The wall would have saved us $Billions. Trump is used to borrowing money for the purpose of making money, same as any businessperson. Almost all businesses have managed debt. What is important is who the lender is, the terms and conditions of the loan, and of course the amount.
 
Last edited:

This is the more important of the two measures.

1681666170049.png
 
He shut down the Govt because the Dems would not give him even more money for his wall.

He never shut down the Govt to cut spending.

He summitted the 4 largest budget request in this history of the country at the time.

He did not run on spending less, in fact bragged about being the king of debt.
Incorrect, Congress allocated money Trump wanted more.
 
The U.S. has fallen into the credit card trap of looking at monthly payments instead of the entire debt amount.
 
Throwing money at problems isn't all bad as long as it actually solves the problems.

Despite the hysteria and economic doomsday predictions it's relatively easy to bring down the debt. Perhaps that's why few in Washington are overly concerned about it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top