frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 46,436
- 9,925
- 2,030
Hey man, I'm just looking at the sociological fact.No, what we do is tell young people to have some common sense, decency and morality.I agree with you, but we aren't talking about rape here.Then again in the past if a man raped a women, well.... it was just considered sex and the woman had to deal with it.
The feminist culture is redefining the terms.
What we are talking about is girls going to parties, getting drunk, and sleeping with guys. In the morning, they feel shame about what they did, and when the guy they like doesn't call them back or want to have anything to do with them, they turn around and call it rape because they are hurt.
In some instances, yes, it is forced sex, but in many others, it is murky at best. Neither the guy or girl can actually remember what happened. So you tell me, who can be blamed? Can anyone?
All I am saying is, if the girl was drunk, there IS NO RAPE. If she was binge drinking and partying so hard, and the guy she was with was doing the same thing, then neither can be held criminally liable for anything.
If they can be, why can't the man say he was raped?
It's like folks don't remember college, have never been, or went to a lame school.
We're not talking about rape? Er... the thread title is about rape.
However I understand what you're saying about people making stuff up. But then again rape is always a hard one to deal with. How do you find a balance of encouraging people to report the crime, but discourage those who weren't raped from not reporting the crime?
What was being said was essentially that it was better when men raped and got away with it, than now where women could potentially use it as a weapon.
Do we give men the license to rape? Do we give women the license to cry wolf?
We tell them to use their heads and roll back the sexual mores of the late sixties and seventies that told them that sex is a toy and a game of pleasure to be used and abused at parties. All one needs to do is watch prime time TV or listen to the Top forty music to get a clue as to what is going on about these mixed messages they are receiving. Popular culture and their peer group tell them one thing; the family, polite society and faith tell them another. Is it any wonder young ladies feel regret about their behavior when they feel they have crossed the line? It is easier to blame others for what they feel are their personal failings, than to pin it on individual desires.
Hell, junior high school kids don't even think giving each other oral sex is even sex anymore because of the MSM culture. If this is the message we are sending them, is it any wonder that they act like drunken debauched Romans having an orgy in college on weekends, treating their bodies like an amusement park? If that is the attitude they are going to adopt, it is time to quit coddling them; it is time to stop having one code of ethics at night time on the weekends, and another Monday morning.
Sending mixed messages about what society expects is what is leading to this problem.
If we do these things, then we will know.
When a woman is sober, and she is attacked and raped, we will know.
If the man and the woman both know what went on, and the witnesses to their "date" both know that they were not binge drinking, folks will know what was a crime of dominance, and what was a drunken night out on the town of both genders looking to get their kicks.
Oh, and telling them to be good old chaps will make them good old chaps, won't it? No, it won't.
You do realize that abstinence only programs are the worst form of preventing sex, don't you?
However I partially agree with you. Yes, we need to instill something into kids. The problem is any time you try and do this the right shout "indoctrination".
Any mention of sex in school before the age of 89 and the right are going crazy that this will corrupt the kids. However the reality is that it works the other way. Kids don't have sex because they've been taught how to be safe, however they do have sex sex when they have sex if they've been taught (up to a certain point, kids will be like adults, stupid, when it suits them).
However you also seem to be calling for a time that won't exist again. Going back to a conservative time. It won't happen, there's no point in trying to go there. You have to deal with what exists. Repression of sex won't work. Education will work much better.
If we are going on like we are going, the culture and the civilization is doomed.
Maybe you're right, maybe the genie can't be put back in the bottle. It's all up to the girls now.They can either act like ladies or act like whores.
It's also about what we expect from our music and media. The shit I see in the theaters, on TV and hear on the radio is garbage compared to what I remember as a kid.
I see real parallels to the Roman empire. The decay and rot has set in.
No, we're not doomed. We just need to find where we want to be. Culture always changes, people always despair at the changing culture.
You know before Christianity people used to have sex, a lot. Why? because it's in our nature to do so. They had sex to get closer to god or gods.
What we have realized is that sex isn't necessarily bad. It's just that it needs to be done in a sensible way. That takes education. The right are against education and see higher rates of bad stuff, like unwanted pregnancies, STDs and so on. .