An honest question about racism

Kudelini

Rookie
Mar 11, 2015
3
0
1
I was watching ESPN's SportsNation last night and Marcellus Wiley, an African American host, made the comment that a white basketball player that tripped while back peddling had a "DNA malfunction". Is this a racist comment? I think if a white commentator said that an African American hockey player tripping had a DNA malfunction, there would be some outrage.
 
I was watching ESPN's SportsNation last night and Marcellus Wiley, an African American host, made the comment that a white basketball player that tripped while back peddling had a "DNA malfunction". Is this a racist comment? I think if a white commentator said that an African American hockey player tripping had a DNA malfunction, there would be some outrage.
What was racist about the comment? Did he say it was because the player was white that he had a DNA malfunction or did he just say he had a DNA malfunction? Where is your link so I can hear for myself?
 
LOL If that had been said about a black the left's and the black's heads would spin and explode. Just part of the double standard
 
I was watching ESPN's SportsNation last night and Marcellus Wiley, an African American host, made the comment that a white basketball player that tripped while back peddling had a "DNA malfunction". Is this a racist comment? I think if a white commentator said that an African American hockey player tripping had a DNA malfunction, there would be some outrage.


Look up the definition of racist then tell me
 
I was watching ESPN's SportsNation last night and Marcellus Wiley, an African American host, made the comment that a white basketball player that tripped while back peddling had a "DNA malfunction". Is this a racist comment? I think if a white commentator said that an African American hockey player tripping had a DNA malfunction, there would be some outrage.


Did he say "WHITE"?

Or did you just happen to notice the player was white?

Doesn't sound racist to me but if he did say the player was "white", it could be construed as racist.
 
Irish+yoga_be8574_4847781.jpg
 
I remember a commentator getting into hot water years back for commenting on slow firing muscles vs fast firing muscles relative to race. He was roundly condemned, and was white.

Avowed racialists like Asclepius and Closed Caption create enormous double standards for behavior based upon race in such a way that they project their own incredible degree of bigotry upon others. They are not really against racism, but merely hate white people. They even hide behind the sophistry of definitions by creating one where they cannot even be considered racist despite the enormous evidence of their bigotry against white people.

A person who is not racist adopts the same standards for all people regardless of race. Only a complete racialist attacks behavior in one case but not in another with the sole difference being the race of the practitioner. How childish.
 
I was watching ESPN's SportsNation last night and Marcellus Wiley, an African American host, made the comment that a white basketball player that tripped while back peddling had a "DNA malfunction". Is this a racist comment? I think if a white commentator said that an African American hockey player tripping had a DNA malfunction, there would be some outrage.


Did he say "WHITE"?

Or did you just happen to notice the player was white?

Doesn't sound racist to me but if he did say the player was "white", it could be construed as racist.
if it's not about race then wtf does a DNA malfunction mean?
 
I remember a commentator getting into hot water years back for commenting on slow firing muscles vs fast firing muscles relative to race. He was roundly condemned, and was white.

Avowed racialists like Asclepius and Closed Caption create enormous double standards for behavior based upon race in such a way that they project their own incredible degree of bigotry upon others. They are not really against racism, but merely hate white people. They even hide behind the sophistry of definitions by creating one where they cannot even be considered racist despite the enormous evidence of their bigotry against white people.

A person who is not racist adopts the same standards for all people regardless of race. Only a complete racialist attacks behavior in one case but not in another with the sole difference being the race of the practitioner. How childish.
Yeah he got in trouble because he was comparing race. This doesnt sound like the same thing.
 
I was watching ESPN's SportsNation last night and Marcellus Wiley, an African American host, made the comment that a white basketball player that tripped while back peddling had a "DNA malfunction". Is this a racist comment? I think if a white commentator said that an African American hockey player tripping had a DNA malfunction, there would be some outrage.


Did he say "WHITE"?

Or did you just happen to notice the player was white?

Doesn't sound racist to me but if he did say the player was "white", it could be construed as racist.
if it's not about race then wtf does a DNA malfunction mean?
It means the DNA the player inherited from his parents was faulty. That can happen to Black or white people. So where is the link?
 
As long as no one looks up definitions any word can mean anything.

For example: The commentator embalmed himself
 
I remember a commentator getting into hot water years back for commenting on slow firing muscles vs fast firing muscles relative to race. He was roundly condemned, and was white.

Avowed racialists like Asclepius and Closed Caption create enormous double standards for behavior based upon race in such a way that they project their own incredible degree of bigotry upon others. They are not really against racism, but merely hate white people. They even hide behind the sophistry of definitions by creating one where they cannot even be considered racist despite the enormous evidence of their bigotry against white people.

A person who is not racist adopts the same standards for all people regardless of race. Only a complete racialist attacks behavior in one case but not in another with the sole difference being the race of the practitioner. How childish.


Dogmaphobe

Check your mirror.

You do exactly what you accuse others of doing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top