Another Black Loser Gets Shot By Police - Jacob Blake Deserved What He Got

With the big question being why were they trying to detain him?
That is irrelevant.

Possibly violating someone's civil rights are never irrelevant.
His civil rights werent violated. Where did you get that weird idea?

We have no idea if that is true yet or not. Unless they can state why they wanted to question and taser him his rights were violated.
A warrant was issued for his arrest the day before. Quit commenting on stories you arent familiar with. Your ignorance based opinions are completely worthless here.

I'll note you didn't provide a link.
Your boy is a sex offender too. You fucking people never fail to defend the worst people in our society.


According to the criminal complaint, Blake and two women were at the Brass Monkey tavern, 1436 Junction Avenue, Saturday when Blake got into an argument with another patron and pulled a black handgun. Blake pointed the gun at the other man, and the magazine fell to the floor. The bartender told Blake to leave, and he did but then pointed the gun through the window at patrons inside the bar before walking south on Junction Avenue.



I've heard people relating the ownership of a gun with sexual inferrences but never quite to this extent.
Bro, for fuck sake, go research your boy. He is an illegal gun owning, gun brandishing, child endangering, sex offender.

He might be. It doesn't give the police the right to try and kill him.
 


EgOmokrX0AE42c8
 
With the big question being why were they trying to detain him?
That is irrelevant.

Possibly violating someone's civil rights are never irrelevant.
His civil rights werent violated. Where did you get that weird idea?

We have no idea if that is true yet or not. Unless they can state why they wanted to question and taser him his rights were violated.
A warrant was issued for his arrest the day before. Quit commenting on stories you arent familiar with. Your ignorance based opinions are completely worthless here.

I'll note you didn't provide a link.
Your boy is a sex offender too. You fucking people never fail to defend the worst people in our society.


According to the criminal complaint, Blake and two women were at the Brass Monkey tavern, 1436 Junction Avenue, Saturday when Blake got into an argument with another patron and pulled a black handgun. Blake pointed the gun at the other man, and the magazine fell to the floor. The bartender told Blake to leave, and he did but then pointed the gun through the window at patrons inside the bar before walking south on Junction Avenue.



I've heard people relating the ownership of a gun with sexual inferrences but never quite to this extent.
Bro, for fuck sake, go research your boy. He is an illegal gun owning, gun brandishing, child endangering, sex offender.

He might be. It doesn't give the police the right to try and kill him.
It does in this circumstance. Never let dudes with warrants on gun charges disbey your orders and reach into their car. That would be fucking stupid.
 
With the big question being why were they trying to detain him?
That is irrelevant.

Possibly violating someone's civil rights are never irrelevant.
His civil rights werent violated. Where did you get that weird idea?

We have no idea if that is true yet or not. Unless they can state why they wanted to question and taser him his rights were violated.
A warrant was issued for his arrest the day before. Quit commenting on stories you arent familiar with. Your ignorance based opinions are completely worthless here.

I'll note you didn't provide a link.
Your boy is a sex offender too. You fucking people never fail to defend the worst people in our society.


According to the criminal complaint, Blake and two women were at the Brass Monkey tavern, 1436 Junction Avenue, Saturday when Blake got into an argument with another patron and pulled a black handgun. Blake pointed the gun at the other man, and the magazine fell to the floor. The bartender told Blake to leave, and he did but then pointed the gun through the window at patrons inside the bar before walking south on Junction Avenue.



I've heard people relating the ownership of a gun with sexual inferrences but never quite to this extent.
Bro, for fuck sake, go research your boy. He is an illegal gun owning, gun brandishing, child endangering, sex offender.

He might be. It doesn't give the police the right to try and kill him.
Damn, your domestic violence causing sex offender had a knife. Now what do you have to say, idiot? :laugh:
 
Ok...Mr Family man was a criminal and a thug. Domestic abuse warrants, which means he likes to beat up his woman..maybe his kids. Asshole. No telling why he continued to his car with his kids in it, with cops holding weapons on him and not being concerned over THEIR safety.
With that said...he's an asshole....but 7 times? Come on. One shot would have made him drop, especially if shot in the ass. THEN grab and arrest his sorry worthless ass. But they didn't. They shot him 7 times in the back. Overkill. Even for a low life thug.
Was definitely crappy police efforts to let it get to this point. Those officers need some real training. Dude should never have made it to a point of climbing/reaching into that car.

All the same, no sympathy for any dumbass that won't respect the orders of police. Gotta be the rap music that makes these punks think they can get away with whatever they want.
Having no fathers is their problem. They have no respect for authority figures as a result.
Oh no doubt, that's where an enormous portion of the problem comes from. :thup:
 
The police have to suspect you of a crime for you to have to comply.
Blake was known to police and there was an active warrant out for his arrest at the time he was shot.

You have no idea if they knew him or not.
Why do you suppose they were arresting him then?

Maybe because he refused to give him is name. If he had committed no crime he doesn't have to. Cops often times don't like you exercising your rights.

He was involved in a fight. That was probable cause to detain him. That he was trying to break it up is not something that cops would necessarily know when they pull up
 
The police have to suspect you of a crime for you to have to comply.
Blake was known to police and there was an active warrant out for his arrest at the time he was shot.

You have no idea if they knew him or not.
Why do you suppose they were arresting him then?

Maybe because he refused to give him is name. If he had committed no crime he doesn't have to. Cops often times don't like you exercising your rights.

He was involved in a fight. That was probable cause to detain him. That he was trying to break it up is not something that cops would necessarily know when they pull up
Nor has it been proven that he was breaking up a fight. Sorry, but im not taking the word of the "witnesses" anymore after the "Mike Brown had his hands up" lie.
 
Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.
So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.
None of the cops lives were threatened.
Threatened only by the worst they imagine about "scary blacks".
 
Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.
So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.
None of the cops lives were threatened.
Threatened only by the worst they imagine about "scary blacks".
Well, that and the knife.
 
With the big question being why were they trying to detain him?
That is irrelevant.

Possibly violating someone's civil rights are never irrelevant.
His civil rights werent violated. Where did you get that weird idea?

We have no idea if that is true yet or not. Unless they can state why they wanted to question and taser him his rights were violated.
A warrant was issued for his arrest the day before. Quit commenting on stories you arent familiar with. Your ignorance based opinions are completely worthless here.

I'll note you didn't provide a link.
Your boy is a sex offender too. You fucking people never fail to defend the worst people in our society.


According to the criminal complaint, Blake and two women were at the Brass Monkey tavern, 1436 Junction Avenue, Saturday when Blake got into an argument with another patron and pulled a black handgun. Blake pointed the gun at the other man, and the magazine fell to the floor. The bartender told Blake to leave, and he did but then pointed the gun through the window at patrons inside the bar before walking south on Junction Avenue.



I've heard people relating the ownership of a gun with sexual inferrences but never quite to this extent.
Bro, for fuck sake, go research your boy. He is an illegal gun owning, gun brandishing, child endangering, sex offender.

He might be. It doesn't give the police the right to try and kill him.
Damn, your domestic violence causing sex offender had a knife. Now what do you have to say, idiot? :laugh:

He might have. He might not have. He was leaving and was shot in the back.

Sometimes they lie.

Sacramento police shot man holding cellphone in his grandmother's yard

Ex-Baton Rouge police officer accused of lying about shooting will face grand jury
 
With the big question being why were they trying to detain him?
That is irrelevant.

Possibly violating someone's civil rights are never irrelevant.
His civil rights werent violated. Where did you get that weird idea?

We have no idea if that is true yet or not. Unless they can state why they wanted to question and taser him his rights were violated.
A warrant was issued for his arrest the day before. Quit commenting on stories you arent familiar with. Your ignorance based opinions are completely worthless here.

I'll note you didn't provide a link.
Your boy is a sex offender too. You fucking people never fail to defend the worst people in our society.


According to the criminal complaint, Blake and two women were at the Brass Monkey tavern, 1436 Junction Avenue, Saturday when Blake got into an argument with another patron and pulled a black handgun. Blake pointed the gun at the other man, and the magazine fell to the floor. The bartender told Blake to leave, and he did but then pointed the gun through the window at patrons inside the bar before walking south on Junction Avenue.



I've heard people relating the ownership of a gun with sexual inferrences but never quite to this extent.
Bro, for fuck sake, go research your boy. He is an illegal gun owning, gun brandishing, child endangering, sex offender.

He might be. It doesn't give the police the right to try and kill him.
Damn, your domestic violence causing sex offender had a knife. Now what do you have to say, idiot? :laugh:

He might have. He might not have. He was leaving and was shot in the back.

Sometimes they lie.

Sacramento police shot man holding cellphone in his grandmother's yard

Ex-Baton Rouge police officer accused of lying about shooting will face grand jury
Black crime sure has ruined the reputation of your people. You guys do so much shooting that it makes everyone paranoid.
 
Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.
So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.
Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond
Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond
Or just a simple rule of engagement that lethal force only be used as a last resort when an actual threat is present and not a perceived or imagined threat. The three officers did nothing to physically restrain or prevent what happened. The had no control of the scene. But maybe that was by design. Innocence by incompetence.
 
Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.
So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.
None of the cops lives were threatened.
Threatened only by the worst they imagine about "scary blacks".

Figures that you would find blacks scary. It's about actions, not race, bucko
 
There's simply no justification for shooting someone in the back.

Now, given the current social climate in this country, and the absolute disdain blacks have for cops, I can understand the cops being on edge. But there was no weapon. He just as easily could've been trying to get into the car to get a candy bar as a gun...
except he said he was going for a gun and had a knife in hand. you gonna risk he really just wanted a baby Ruth?

There was no gun found, so your assertion that he was going for a gun is factually incorrect, as is the statement about the knife.

Blake was unarmed.

Shooting someone in the back seven times is criminal.

And I don't even like negroes...
 
Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.
So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.
None of the cops lives were threatened.
Threatened only by the worst they imagine about "scary blacks".
Well, that and the knife.

You had Hutch scared at "black." Democrats want race wars so they can manipulate them for their own advantage. They have no souls
 

Forum List

Back
Top