Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are significant differences between that case, and this one.Tell that to the jury judging Michael Slager.
Kenosha businesses damaged and vehicles burned after police officer shoots Jacob Blake in the back
Several vehicles in a car dealership were set ablaze after 2 a.m. as people moved through the city.www.jsonline.com
"Unrest continued in Kenosha early Monday morning after police shot a man in the 2800 block of 40th Street sometime after 5:11 p.m., the encounter partially captured in a video that showed an officer firing several shots at close range into the man's back. Wisconsin officials identified the shooting victim as Jacob Blake, a Black man. He was in serious condition at Froedtert Hospital in Milwaukee as of early Monday morning, law enforcement said."
First of all, this guy is no victim, he brought all of this on himself. Witnesses claim the police were called to a domestic disturbance at which the suspect was attempting to break up a fight...I am sure there is more than what the video shows, but the video itself clearly shows the man disobeying police orders, walking to his car to get a weapon -- and the police had no choice but to shoot him....plus this guy has a criminal record.....
Now the governor is taking the side of the black thug and not the police; there are riots in the streets of Democrat run Kenosha..none of this rioting and violence will be happening in Trump's second term -- he is allowing it to happen now to teach dumb black voters a lesson, but when he is re-elected -- he will turn the streets crimson with their blood and cleanse our nation..
Prayers up for the good people in Kenosha, regardless of color. I'm glad the man who was shot survived. Prayers up for his healing. I'm also sorry to hear Democrat ooperatives from Chicago drove to Kenosha to slash and burn the city down. I hope they do serious time in jail for burning the town into nothing.
There are significant differences between that case, and this one.Tell that to the jury judging Michael Slager.
The most glaring difference is in the Michael Slager case, a man ran away from a car. In this case a criminal resisting arrest attempted to get in a car.
Two very different situations.
But thank you for pointing out your bigotry, how you see no differences in the two separate incidents and that you stereotype any incident you see involving police and criminals.
He has a lawyer for that. Don't you know how our court system works?Tell that to the jury judging Michael Slager.
He has a lawyer for that. Don't you know how our court system works?Tell that to the jury judging Michael Slager.
Knowing how to cuff someone resisting arrest can be just as important for prevention.Yes, it is. That is why being able to cuff someone resisting arrest is important.I agree to disagree. Police still get their personal protection equipment from the State. Peace through superior force before superior firepower. Police should know how to place at least one cuff on a person and try to "lock them down" even while "wrestling with the perpetrator".That could have been avoided if that man had obeyed the police in the first place. They wear a shiny fasces of Power on their uniforms for a reason.
With all of those police present; it does not seem deadly use of force was Necessary.
Yeah, cuz when one or two of them gets shot, or knifed, well, that's ok because they deserve it for being cops in the first place, right?
Is their safety important?
Then you should know that prior to that happening it is preferable to have the suspect submit....Or, again, you are not thinking of the officers safety.
You dont even know the name of, Walter Scott. You hardly know the details of that case. Again, you are stereotyping.The man in the Slager case initially resisted arrest also.
Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.
Making things up is cowardly also. There was no gun in the car,
Where did you see that?
That's like asking where did I see that there were no horses in the car.
Oh, so you have nothing showing that he wasn't reaching for a weapon....Thought so....Dismissed.
I have nothing that shows he wasn't reaching for a nuclear weapon either.
Its not up to me to prove something that never happened.
We won't know if there was or wasn't a weapon in the car until the investigation is made public....If you want to destroy your credibility with bs narratives, that's on you.
If there had been a gun in the car we would have heard about it by now. Too many witnesses to plant one.
Who said it had to be a gun?
That was the claim that was replied to.
Oh for Christ sake....It is impossible trying to discuss things rationally with you people...
You asked a question. I answered it. There is nothing more rational than that. Now if you are asking who specifically said there was a gun, go back and look. It was said more than once.
Knowing how to cuff someone resisting arrest can be just as important for prevention.Yes, it is. That is why being able to cuff someone resisting arrest is important.I agree to disagree. Police still get their personal protection equipment from the State. Peace through superior force before superior firepower. Police should know how to place at least one cuff on a person and try to "lock them down" even while "wrestling with the perpetrator".That could have been avoided if that man had obeyed the police in the first place. They wear a shiny fasces of Power on their uniforms for a reason.
With all of those police present; it does not seem deadly use of force was Necessary.
Yeah, cuz when one or two of them gets shot, or knifed, well, that's ok because they deserve it for being cops in the first place, right?
Is their safety important?
Then you should know that prior to that happening it is preferable to have the suspect submit....Or, again, you are not thinking of the officers safety.
I dunno, how do you cuff someone with a knife who is running away from you, going to his car opening the door and reaching for what could be a gun? I order to cuff someone they have to stand still and consent. Maybe cops should be taught by cowboys to lasso their perps and hog tie them like young male bovines who also get branded and castrated.Knowing how to cuff someone resisting arrest can be just as important for prevention.
Knowing how to cuff someone resisting arrest can be just as important for prevention.He should have been detained and placed in custody before that happened.Yes, it is. That is why being able to cuff someone resisting arrest is important.I agree to disagree. Police still get their personal protection equipment from the State. Peace through superior force before superior firepower. Police should know how to place at least one cuff on a person and try to "lock them down" even while "wrestling with the perpetrator".That could have been avoided if that man had obeyed the police in the first place. They wear a shiny fasces of Power on their uniforms for a reason.
With all of those police present; it does not seem deadly use of force was Necessary.
Yeah, cuz when one or two of them gets shot, or knifed, well, that's ok because they deserve it for being cops in the first place, right?
Is their safety important?
Then you should know that prior to that happening it is preferable to have the suspect submit....Or, again, you are not thinking of the officers safety.
I'm pretty sure that they were following protocol...When he reached the vechicle and reached in like a dumbass, all bets were off...
The guy in the video did not appear armed. And, cuffing someone is supposed to happen before it gets to that point. It is a Preventive measure.I dunno, how do you cuff someone with a knife who is running away from you, going to his car opening the door and reaching for what could be a gun? I order to cuff someone they have to stand still and consent. Maybe cops should be taught by cowboys to lasso their perps and hog tie them like young male bovines who also get branded and castrated.Knowing how to cuff someone resisting arrest can be just as important for prevention.
Criminal lives should never matter----------as a society, we are better off shooting criminals than babying them by far and away.It’s almost as if black lives don’t matter.do you remember the story about the little boy who cried wolf?
if not dont worry
because its been playing out in real life across America starting with that brn fool barack obama and the crazy black harvard professor who cried wolf about a white cop who was just doing his job
then libs doubled down and cried wolf again over the george zimmerman/travvon martin incident
then it was on the baltimore and the slander of the police again
and again in Ferguson MO with the ”gentle giant” thug and thief
in every case obama tried to blame white cops every time a jury disagreed
now this which almost seems as if the wolf really did come to eat the sheep
but for liberal race baiters it may be too little, too late
Yes, you shoot them first so they are easier to arrest.Knowing how to cuff someone resisting arrest can be just as important for prevention.Yes, it is. That is why being able to cuff someone resisting arrest is important.I agree to disagree. Police still get their personal protection equipment from the State. Peace through superior force before superior firepower. Police should know how to place at least one cuff on a person and try to "lock them down" even while "wrestling with the perpetrator".That could have been avoided if that man had obeyed the police in the first place. They wear a shiny fasces of Power on their uniforms for a reason.
With all of those police present; it does not seem deadly use of force was Necessary.
Yeah, cuz when one or two of them gets shot, or knifed, well, that's ok because they deserve it for being cops in the first place, right?
Is their safety important?
Then you should know that prior to that happening it is preferable to have the suspect submit....Or, again, you are not thinking of the officers safety.
Nothing is perfect. Hence the appeal process.Not always very well.
No, the observation on Kamala is that she's a mattress riding whore who has no scruples.Isn't that the complaint about Kamala Harris?
Proof, natural rights mean nothing to the Right Wing outside of abortion threads; and they don't care about Due Process.Yes, you shoot them first so they are easier to arrest.Knowing how to cuff someone resisting arrest can be just as important for prevention.Yes, it is. That is why being able to cuff someone resisting arrest is important.I agree to disagree. Police still get their personal protection equipment from the State. Peace through superior force before superior firepower. Police should know how to place at least one cuff on a person and try to "lock them down" even while "wrestling with the perpetrator".That could have been avoided if that man had obeyed the police in the first place. They wear a shiny fasces of Power on their uniforms for a reason.
With all of those police present; it does not seem deadly use of force was Necessary.
Yeah, cuz when one or two of them gets shot, or knifed, well, that's ok because they deserve it for being cops in the first place, right?
Is their safety important?
Then you should know that prior to that happening it is preferable to have the suspect submit....Or, again, you are not thinking of the officers safety.
Natural rights? You have the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, a right to make a phone call, a right to be heard in court------------BUT you don't have a right to refuse to be arrested or attack cops. OUr founders never intended for criminals to refuse to be arrested...they would be first to kill off thugs like BLM are claiming are victims.Proof, natural rights mean nothing to the Right Wing outside of abortion threads; and they don't care about Due Process.Yes, you shoot them first so they are easier to arrest.Knowing how to cuff someone resisting arrest can be just as important for prevention.Yes, it is. That is why being able to cuff someone resisting arrest is important.I agree to disagree. Police still get their personal protection equipment from the State. Peace through superior force before superior firepower. Police should know how to place at least one cuff on a person and try to "lock them down" even while "wrestling with the perpetrator".That could have been avoided if that man had obeyed the police in the first place. They wear a shiny fasces of Power on their uniforms for a reason.
With all of those police present; it does not seem deadly use of force was Necessary.
Yeah, cuz when one or two of them gets shot, or knifed, well, that's ok because they deserve it for being cops in the first place, right?
Is their safety important?
Then you should know that prior to that happening it is preferable to have the suspect submit....Or, again, you are not thinking of the officers safety.
You omitted Due Process.Natural rights? You have the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, a right to make a phone call, a right to be heard in court------------BUT you don't have a right to refuse to be arrested or attack cops. OUr founders never intended for criminals to refuse to be arrested...they would be first to kill off thugs like BLM are claiming are victims.Proof, natural rights mean nothing to the Right Wing outside of abortion threads; and they don't care about Due Process.Yes, you shoot them first so they are easier to arrest.Knowing how to cuff someone resisting arrest can be just as important for prevention.Yes, it is. That is why being able to cuff someone resisting arrest is important.I agree to disagree. Police still get their personal protection equipment from the State. Peace through superior force before superior firepower. Police should know how to place at least one cuff on a person and try to "lock them down" even while "wrestling with the perpetrator".That could have been avoided if that man had obeyed the police in the first place. They wear a shiny fasces of Power on their uniforms for a reason.
With all of those police present; it does not seem deadly use of force was Necessary.
Yeah, cuz when one or two of them gets shot, or knifed, well, that's ok because they deserve it for being cops in the first place, right?
Is their safety important?
Then you should know that prior to that happening it is preferable to have the suspect submit....Or, again, you are not thinking of the officers safety.
