Another Black Loser Gets Shot By Police - Jacob Blake Deserved What He Got

[kaz]

Then what did you mean by that you think blacks are scary? It seems to speak for itself. Sounds like prejudice to me

Liberals always project their own fears, ignorance, incompetence, and racism on others. The lack the cognitive ability to realize not everyone shares their flaws.

Exactly. Hutch Starskey brought up the stone cold shit that blacks are scary unprompted and irrelevant to the discussion. He was getting his fears of scary blacks out by projecting his own feelings onto others

Exactly. @Hutch Starskey brought up the stone cold shit that blacks are scary unprompted and irrelevant to the discussion. He was getting his fears of scary blacks out by projecting his own feelings onto others

Your failure to understand the context and relevance of my post only speaks to your own incompetence and lack of self awarenesss, loser.

What context clarifies your statement that blacks are scary? I don't see how different contexts change the meaning of that. At least you're honest that blacks scare you. Kudos for that.

Just FYI, blacks are people. No more, no less. No reason to be particularly afraid of them versus anyone else

I don't see

Exactly my point.

You changed the meaning of those words. You're a disingenuous hack

Cops for years got away with breaking the law. Turn about is fair play.

So you think just because some cops in the past did wrong things it justifies attacking other innocent cops today? You are the epitome of an idiot.

Absolutely not. That's why it's so important to weed out the cops who can't do the job without killing unarmed people.

You keep ignoring it, but it's a flash second to grab a gun and shoot a cop dead. You keep ignoring that.

Nope. Already answered you. The cops should have never let him open the door to his car. They fucked up. Now their facing attempted murder charges. Which is really, kind of unfair. Clearly their training didn't prepare them for this.

Why shouldn't they have allowed him to open his door?

Kaz is making excuses for shooting him seven times, in the back, at point blank range, in front of his children. He claims the cops thought he was reaching for a gun.

There's nothing at all wrong with him opening his door, unless he was going for a gun. If that's what the cops were worried bout, they should have never let him open the door. Kaz is just dancing. Anything to defend the home team.

When you say things like "in front of his children" you show that you're appealing to emotion, not logic.

Why did he defy cops in front of his children? What a terrible example that was

Again, why was he not allowed to get in his car and leave?

Because the police discovered that there was a warrant for his arrest...

When? How? He had no obligation to tell them anything. He had committed no crime.

Yes, he did. There was an open warrant out for his arrest which had absolutely nothing to do with this incident...

He had committed no crime in breaking up a fight. He is free to leave.

That's what the cops had to sort out. Being in the middle of a fight is clearly probable cause

Breaking up a fight is not illegal. The police are not providing any sort of alternative situation. They do when it tends to exonerate them. They don't when it doesn't.

And if the cops did something wrong, then he should follow up later. Not ignore them and put them in a life threatening situation by going into his car where they can't see what's going on

None of the cops lives were threatened.

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Not yet and we know that you prefer the requirement to be the criminal draws and fires first before the police can respond

Or just a simple rule of engagement that lethal force only be used as a last resort when an actual threat is present and not a perceived or imagined threat. The three officers did nothing to physically restrain or prevent what happened. The had no control of the scene. But maybe that was by design. Innocence by incompetence.

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Did you see a longer clip that showed that or did you pull it out of your ass? You can't conclude that from the clip in the OP, insufficient evidence

Which officer stepped in front of him to prevent him from walking around the car?

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

So you admit you did pull it out of your ass, you didn't see more clip than we did which completely doesn't support your bull shit claim

At the start of the clip he was walking to the car and the cops were behind him. How the hell would they have stepped in front of him from behind him?

That is some seriously weak shit, dude.
Three cops. No one stopped him.
They're fucked.

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

It's "weak" that cops standing behind him when he was walking didn't step in front of him? You really are an intellectual vacuum

LOL...
Three officers and not a single one had enough situational awareness or control over the situation to prevent a tragedy not only to Blake but their own carreers and society at large.

You made that up since you apparently saw the same clip I did in the OP where the cops were standing behind him

same clip I did in the OP where the cops were standing behind him

Again your incompetence let's you down.

If their goal was to prevent him from getting in his car..... they failed. The fact that they were all behind him and no one circled around the back of the vehicle to intercept him is clear evidence of their ineptitude.

You're an idiot. There's no one someone circling around the car would have gotten there first. Just more of your wanting as you say "scary blacks" getting killed because you think somehow a race war will help Democrats

You changed the meaning of those words. You're a disingenuous hack

I changed nothing.
That was your premise. That you "did not see". I simply agreed.

You took those three words out of context, which completely changed the meaning. You know that cutting posts is not supposed to change the meaning. You're a disingenuous hack

You took those three words out of context, which completely changed the meaning. You know that cutting posts is not supposed to change the meaning. You're a disingenuous hack

I did no such thing. That was the context. Your entire post was you explaining how "you don't see". I was going to quote it for all to see but you've since deleted it and are now being rather disingenuous yourself.
I see you cannot stand by your own posts.

You're a liar, go fuck yourself

You're a liar, go fuck yourself

Then show us the post and what meaning I changed. Or just keep crying.

Who is "us?" You and the voices in your head?

Who is "us?" You and the voices in your head?

The readers, dope.
Wipe the snot hanging off your face and take care of it.

And you think the readers are all on your side? WTF, don't you read any of the replies to you? Trust me, they're not all on your side.

Speak for yourself

nd you think the readers are all on your side? WTF, don't you read any of the replies to you? Trust me, they're not all on your side.

Speak for yourself

I said nothing about sides, dope.
You said I misrepresented you. Obviously to the readers. Show us.
Oh that's right. You deleted it. Out of embarrassment no doubt.

Keep crying though.

Obviously you're light in the front of your pants since you so deeply crave the validation of others. "I" is far more powerful than "us." Well, it would be if you had a pair.

Not playing your ad hominem bull shit, Maam. Speak for yourself

 

[kaz]

And you think the readers are all on your side? WTF, don't you read any of the replies to you? Trust me, they're not all on your side.

He's a typical brain dead drone. Needs to imply that the collective has his back because he's insecure over his own ignorant opinions.

He's a typical brain dead drone. Needs to imply that the collective has his back because he's insecure over his own ignorant opinions.

Another incompetent reader. I implied no such thing, dope.

Of course you did, you said you were speaking for throngs of people hanging on your every word cheering your every post and high fiving your every lame leftist insult. You have serious manhood issues. You need your ego to be propped up by the collectivist horde because even you know you're actually a loser.


There is no "us" you are speaking for. There is you, Hutch. One person

 

[kaz]

Philandro Castillo was killed because he told the cop he had a gun and reached for it and refused to freeze when the officer told him to.

I realize if you ever touched a gun you'd scream hysterically and break out in heaving sobs, but actual gun owners get lots of advice on what to do if you're pulled over and have a legal gun in the car.

1) Be White. They'll take you alive even if you just shot 9 people in a church. If you are really nice, they might even take you to Burger King.



2) If you aren't white, expect to be shot with no consequences.

They told you that at your last Klan meeting? Don't believe it, Joe. Actually do, never mind. You're good. Don't drop your gun when the cops come. You're white, you'll be fine. Trust me, do it

 

[elektra]

We aren't writing a scholarly report here. Some like yourself aren't even interested in being truthful. I have no desire to continue to respond to those like yourself.

Okay, I understand, keep the narrative very vague. Dont include any details, so the police sound like they are simply shooting innocents in the back.

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

Philandro Castillo was killed because he told the cop he had a gun and reached for it and refused to freeze when the officer told him to.

I realize if you ever touched a gun you'd scream hysterically and break out in heaving sobs, but actual gun owners get lots of advice on what to do if you're pulled over and have a legal gun in the car.

1) Be White. They'll take you alive even if you just shot 9 people in a church. If you are really nice, they might even take you to Burger King.



2) If you aren't white, expect to be shot with no consequences.

3) If you're a Darwin Recipient with a violent criminal history with weapons charges, and aggressively resist arrest while on a warrant; expect to get your ass capped know matter WHO THE F you are.

I rarely call anyone a stupid MF on the upper boards, but you are one stupid MF!!!!.....I apologize up front Joe.

 

[kaz]

He wasn't attempting to get into his SUV. He was clearly reaching for something. That something was an illegal handgun.

Link, please.

One can not provide a link to back when their parents failed in teaching that lying is wrong.

I've been looking around, trying to get the whole story. Maybe he got that one in the alternate universe.

I've been looking around, trying to get the whole story. Maybe he got that one in the alternate universe.

I think if there were exculpatory evidence to support the officers' actions, it would have been released. If for no other reason than to maintain the peace.

They can't release partial investigations like that. BS

The police in Georgia quickly released information when the cops shot a man in the back in the fast food parking lot. The police quickly release info lots of time when they believe it helps their argument.

A guy who was firing a taser at them. You really just want a race war because you think it helps Democrats. It sure doesn't help blacks. That's just the racism of the Democrat party victimizing benefits for their own benefit

He wasn't firing a taser at them. Why are you unable to be honest?

The guy in Georgia was most certainly shooting a taser at them.
That is not even in dispute.

Except it is. The taser was spent. It wouldn't fire.

Except that's a lie. It was shown false long ago. You're still dredging up and repeating the old lies. That wasn't the kind of taser that only shoots once. It shoots and recharges. Next you'll go back to 2017 and Russia. You gotta keep up with the latest talking points

 

[kaz]

Philandro Castillo was killed because he told the cop he had a gun and reached for it and refused to freeze when the officer told him to.

I realize if you ever touched a gun you'd scream hysterically and break out in heaving sobs, but actual gun owners get lots of advice on what to do if you're pulled over and have a legal gun in the car.

1) Be White. They'll take you alive even if you just shot 9 people in a church. If you are really nice, they might even take you to Burger King.



2) If you aren't white, expect to be shot with no consequences.

3) If you're a Darwin Recipient with a violent criminal history with weapons charges, and aggressively resist arrest while on a warrant; expect to get your ass capped know matter WHO THE F you are.

I rarely call anyone a stupid MF on the upper boards, but you are one stupid MF!!!!.....I apologize up front Joe.

Joe needs to test his theory he can wave guns around and threaten cops and he's safe because he's white. He said they'll buy him breakfast. I want to see the article they write about him after he does that proving him right.

Go ahead, Joe, do it. Try your theory that cops don't shoot whites with guns, they buy them breakfast

 

[dannyboys]

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Making things up is cowardly also. There was no gun in the car,

Where did you see that?

That's like asking where did I see that there were no horses in the car.

Oh, so you have nothing showing that he wasn't reaching for a weapon....Thought so....Dismissed.

I have nothing that shows he wasn't reaching for a nuclear weapon either.

Its not up to me to prove something that never happened.

We won't know if there was or wasn't a weapon in the car until the investigation is made public....If you want to destroy your credibility with bs narratives, that's on you.

If there had been a gun in the car we would have heard about it by now. Too many witnesses to plant one.

Who said it had to be a gun?

That was the claim that was replied to.

Oh for Christ sake....It is impossible trying to discuss things rationally with you people...

You asked a question. I answered it. There is nothing more rational than that. Now if you are asking who specifically said there was a gun, go back and look. It was said more than once.

In each case, I would say we don't know what he was reaching for.

There is nothing to say he was reaching for anything.

That is not what the video shows.
BTW Where were all the mothers of the thugs' kids during the press conference?

 

[pknopp]

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Making things up is cowardly also. There was no gun in the car,

Where did you see that?

That's like asking where did I see that there were no horses in the car.

Oh, so you have nothing showing that he wasn't reaching for a weapon....Thought so....Dismissed.

I have nothing that shows he wasn't reaching for a nuclear weapon either.

Its not up to me to prove something that never happened.

We won't know if there was or wasn't a weapon in the car until the investigation is made public....If you want to destroy your credibility with bs narratives, that's on you.

If there had been a gun in the car we would have heard about it by now. Too many witnesses to plant one.

Who said it had to be a gun?

That was the claim that was replied to.

Oh for Christ sake....It is impossible trying to discuss things rationally with you people...

You asked a question. I answered it. There is nothing more rational than that. Now if you are asking who specifically said there was a gun, go back and look. It was said more than once.

In each case, I would say we don't know what he was reaching for.

There is nothing to say he was reaching for anything.

That is not what the video shows.
BTW Where were all the mothers of the thugs' kids during the press conference?

The video does show that.

Where were Trump's kids moms?

 

[basquebromance]

he got a bullet in the head, bullet in the head. HE GOT A BULLET IN THE HEAD!

 

[kaz]

Shooting a man in the back has always been considered cowardly.

Making things up is cowardly also. There was no gun in the car,

Where did you see that?

That's like asking where did I see that there were no horses in the car.

Oh, so you have nothing showing that he wasn't reaching for a weapon....Thought so....Dismissed.

I have nothing that shows he wasn't reaching for a nuclear weapon either.

Its not up to me to prove something that never happened.

We won't know if there was or wasn't a weapon in the car until the investigation is made public....If you want to destroy your credibility with bs narratives, that's on you.

If there had been a gun in the car we would have heard about it by now. Too many witnesses to plant one.

Who said it had to be a gun?

That was the claim that was replied to.

Oh for Christ sake....It is impossible trying to discuss things rationally with you people...

You asked a question. I answered it. There is nothing more rational than that. Now if you are asking who specifically said there was a gun, go back and look. It was said more than once.

In each case, I would say we don't know what he was reaching for.

There is nothing to say he was reaching for anything.

That is not what the video shows.
BTW Where were all the mothers of the thugs' kids during the press conference?

The video does show that.

Where were Trump's kids moms?

Again, you're repeating the cop couldn't do anything until he was dead. He had to sit and wait to find out if he was reaching for a gun or not. By the time he saw one, it would clearly be too late.

You want a race war, you're clear as day

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

Philandro Castillo was killed because he told the cop he had a gun and reached for it and refused to freeze when the officer told him to.

I realize if you ever touched a gun you'd scream hysterically and break out in heaving sobs, but actual gun owners get lots of advice on what to do if you're pulled over and have a legal gun in the car.

1) Be White. They'll take you alive even if you just shot 9 people in a church. If you are really nice, they might even take you to Burger King.



2) If you aren't white, expect to be shot with no consequences.

3) If you're a Darwin Recipient with a violent criminal history with weapons charges, and aggressively resist arrest while on a warrant; expect to get your ass capped know matter WHO THE F you are.

I rarely call anyone a stupid MF on the upper boards, but you are one stupid MF!!!!.....I apologize up front Joe.

Joe needs to test his theory he can wave guns around and threaten cops and he's safe because he's white. He said they'll buy him breakfast. I want to see the article they write about him after he does that proving him right.

Go ahead, Joe, do it. Try your theory that cops don't shoot whites with guns, they buy them breakfast

Serve him ground up breakfast Hash to represent the carnage he can't see, and probably has no idea it exists.

 

[Blues Lifer]

With the big question being why were they trying to detain him?

That is irrelevant.

Possibly violating someone's civil rights are never irrelevant.

His civil rights werent violated. Where did you get that weird idea?

We have no idea if that is true yet or not. Unless they can state why they wanted to question and taser him his rights were violated.

A warrant was issued for his arrest the day before. Quit commenting on stories you arent familiar with. Your ignorance based opinions are completely worthless here.

I'll note you didn't provide a link.

Your boy is a sex offender too. You fucking people never fail to defend the worst people in our society.


According to the criminal complaint, Blake and two women were at the Brass Monkey tavern, 1436 Junction Avenue, Saturday when Blake got into an argument with another patron and pulled a black handgun. Blake pointed the gun at the other man, and the magazine fell to the floor. The bartender told Blake to leave, and he did but then pointed the gun through the window at patrons inside the bar before walking south on Junction Avenue.

UPDATE: K9 Dozer Helps Subdue Man Who Pulled Gun at Bar | Racine County Eye

UPDATE 8/26/2020: Please note, court officials told the Racine County Eye that Mr. Blake was not convicted of any of the charges listed in this story.

racinecountyeye.com

I've heard people relating the ownership of a gun with sexual inferrences but never quite to this extent.

Bro, for fuck sake, go research your boy. He is an illegal gun owning, gun brandishing, child endangering, sex offender.

He might be. It doesn't give the police the right to try and kill him.

Damn, your domestic violence causing sex offender had a knife. Now what do you have to say, idiot?

He might have. He might not have. He was leaving and was shot in the back.

Sometimes they lie.

Sacramento police shot man holding cellphone in his grandmother's yard

Ex-Baton Rouge police officer accused of lying about shooting will face grand jury

Black crime sure has ruined the reputation of your people. You guys do so much shooting that it makes everyone paranoid.

Exactly. What is it? 13% black population but they are responsible for 90% of violent crime?

Or just a simple rule of engagement that lethal force only be used as a last resort when an actual threat is present and not a perceived or imagined threat. The three officers did nothing to physically restrain or prevent what happened. The had no control of the scene. But maybe that was by design. Innocence by incompetence.

The circumstances of when deadly force is authorized are hardly ambiguous. This is from Cornell Law School (my notes in bold):

§ 1047.7 Use of deadly force.

(a) Deadly force means that force which a reasonable person would consider likely to cause death or serious bodily harm. Its use may be justified only under conditions of extreme necessity, when all lesser means have failed or cannot reasonably be employed. A protective force officer is authorized to use deadly force only when one or more of the following circumstances exists:

(1) Self-Defense. When deadly force reasonably appears to be necessary to protect a protective force officer who reasonably believes himself or herself to be in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm.

Blake was carrying neither a gun or a knife. There was no gun in his car, therefore the police on scene should've been able to employ other measures to subdue him...

(2) Serious offenses against persons. When deadly force reasonably appears to be necessary to prevent the commission of a serious offense against a person(s) in circumstances presenting an imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm (e.g. sabotage of an occupied facility by explosives).

Again, with no weapon available to Blake, there was no imminent danger to anyone...

(3) Nuclear weapons or nuclear explosive devices. When deadly force reasonably appears to be necessary to prevent the theft, sabotage, or unauthorized control of a nuclear weapon or nuclear explosive device.

(4) Special nuclear material. When deadly force reasonably appears to be necessary to prevent the theft, sabotage, or unauthorized control of special nuclear material from an area of a fixed site or from a shipment where Category II or greater quantities are known or reasonably believed to be present.
Note: (These offenses are considered by the Department of Energy to pose a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm)

I don't think we really need to discuss these two...

(5) Apprehension. When deadly force reasonably appears to be necessary to apprehend or prevent the escape of a person reasonably believed to: (i) have committed an offense of the nature specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) 1 of this section; or (ii) be escaping by use of a weapon or explosive or who otherwise indicates that he or she poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the protective force officer or others unless apprehended without delay.

Blake was not fleeing from the commission of a crime, and the warrant for his arrest fails to satisfy this requirement, nor was he using a weapon of any type which may have been a danger to the police officer...

(b) Additional Considerations Involving Firearms. If it becomes necessary to use a firearm, the following precautions shall be observed:

(1) A warning, e.g. an order to halt, shall be given, if feasible, before a shot is fired.

(2) Warning shots shall not be fired.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The cop who fired the seven shots is fucked. There's simply no way for a reasonable person to reach the conclusion that firing seven bullets into the man from behind was the way to handle this...

The cops were protecting those 3 poor children in the car. This lunatic criminal fleeing from police and trying to either arm himself or get in the car to inherently endanger those children. The dude wouldn't follow police instruction. Sucks to be him, but no jury will condemn the police on this.

 

[Orangecat]

I find it really sad that you have a problem with something you would give a make politician a pass for.

You're sad for no reason, then, as I have no problem with her past. I'm just not afraid to be honest about it.

 

[kaz]

Exactly. What is it? 13% black population but they are responsible for 90% of violent crime?

No, 13% commit about half of violent crime, at least for murders

 

[Blues Lifer]

Exactly. What is it? 13% black population but they are responsible for 90% of violent crime?

No, 13% commit about half of violent crime, at least for murders

Thanks. I was not being real serious with the number; just making the point we all know too well.

 

[kaz]

Exactly. What is it? 13% black population but they are responsible for 90% of violent crime?

No, 13% commit about half of violent crime, at least for murders

Thanks. I was not being real serious with the number; just making the point we all know too well.

I don't get it, but OK

 

[pknopp]

I find it really sad that you have a problem with something you would give a make politician a pass for.

You're sad for no reason, then, as I have no problem with her past. I'm just not afraid to be honest about it.

If that was true you wouldn't have said what you did and intentionally not quote that part this time.

 

[elektra]

Another example of how democrats have no place in any society. That example being, those who are posting comments here, calling the police murderers.

 

[Orangecat]

If that was true you wouldn't have said what you did and intentionally not quote that part this time.

Stop your whining, kid. I told you the truth. Accept it or GFY.