teapartysamurai
Gold Member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 20,056
- 2,562
- 290
What, if in WWII, FDR claimed he had defeated the Nazis, but really hadn't. He killed Hitler, but after that he left Europe and did nothing.
In a few years we hear of attacks and swastika emblazoned men in this country yelling, "Hitler still lives," make random attacks in this country, even beheading people?
So, FDR already created the narrative that the Nazis were destroyed, so he can't say they came back. So, he makes up a name for these guys. He calls them the Klugnuts. Yeah, that's it! The Klugnuts are rising in Europe and we have to go to war against them.
Well, that's what we have now! Obama claimed that Al Queda was dead. He killed Bin Laden and Al Queda was defeated.
But now we have all kind of terrorism in Iraq and Syria. Obama CAN'T say Al Queda is back. No No No! "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive." (Remember that?)
Problem is GM is dead and Al Queda is decidedly NOT dead.
A LOT more here: The Khorosan Group Does Not Exist National Review Online
So, once again expect the Liberal media to go along with this BS and that we never get a straight story about what's really going on.
In a few years we hear of attacks and swastika emblazoned men in this country yelling, "Hitler still lives," make random attacks in this country, even beheading people?
So, FDR already created the narrative that the Nazis were destroyed, so he can't say they came back. So, he makes up a name for these guys. He calls them the Klugnuts. Yeah, that's it! The Klugnuts are rising in Europe and we have to go to war against them.
Well, that's what we have now! Obama claimed that Al Queda was dead. He killed Bin Laden and Al Queda was defeated.
But now we have all kind of terrorism in Iraq and Syria. Obama CAN'T say Al Queda is back. No No No! "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive." (Remember that?)
Problem is GM is dead and Al Queda is decidedly NOT dead.
The Khorosan Group Does Not Exist
It’s a fictitious name the Obama administration invented to deceive us.
We’re being had. Again.
For six years, President Obama has endeavored to will the country into accepting two pillars of his alternative national-security reality. First, he claims to have dealt decisively with the terrorist threat, rendering it a disparate series of ragtag jayvees. Second, he asserts that the threat is unrelated to Islam, which is innately peaceful, moderate, and opposed to the wanton “violent extremists” who purport to act in its name.
Now, the president has been compelled to act against a jihad that has neither ended nor been “decimated.” The jihad, in fact, has inevitably intensified under his counterfactual worldview, which holds that empowering Islamic supremacists is the path to security and stability. Yet even as war intensifies in Iraq and Syria — even as jihadists continue advancing, continue killing and capturing hapless opposition forces on the ground despite Obama’s futile air raids — the president won’t let go of the charade.
Hence, Obama gives us the Khorosan Group.
The who?
There is a reason that no one had heard of such a group until a nanosecond ago, when the “Khorosan Group” suddenly went from anonymity to the “imminent threat” that became the rationale for an emergency air war there was supposedly no time to ask Congress to authorize.
You haven’t heard of the Khorosan Group because there isn’t one. It is a name the administration came up with, calculating that Khorosan — the –Iranian–Afghan border region — had sufficient connection to jihadist lore that no one would call the president on it.
The “Khorosan Group” is al-Qaeda. It is simply a faction within the global terror network’s Syrian franchise, “Jabhat al-Nusra.” Its leader, Mushin al-Fadhli (believed to have been killed in this week’s U.S.-led air strikes), was an intimate of Ayman al-Zawahiri, the emir of al-Qaeda who dispatched him to the jihad in Syria. Except that if you listen to administration officials long enough, you come away thinking that Zawahiri is not really al-Qaeda, either. Instead, he’s something the administration is at pains to call “core al-Qaeda.”
“Core al-Qaeda,” you are to understand, is different from “Jabhat al-Nusra,” which in turn is distinct from “al-Qaeda in Iraq” (formerly “al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia,” now the “Islamic State” al-Qaeda spin-off that is, itself, formerly “al-Qaeda in Iraq and al-Sham” or “al-Qaeda in Iraq and the Levant”). That al-Qaeda, don’t you know, is a different outfit from al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula . . . which, of course, should never be mistaken for “al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb,” “Boko Haram,” “Ansar al-Sharia,” or the latest entry, “al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent.”
Coming soon, “al-Qaeda on Hollywood and Vine.” In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me if, come 2015, Obama issued an executive order decreeing twelve new jihad jayvees stretching from al-Qaeda in January through al-Qaeda in December.
Except you’ll hear only about the jayvees, not the jihad. You see, there is a purpose behind this dizzying proliferation of names assigned to what, in reality, is a global network with multiple tentacles and occasional internecine rivalries.
A LOT more here: The Khorosan Group Does Not Exist National Review Online
So, once again expect the Liberal media to go along with this BS and that we never get a straight story about what's really going on.