Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
troll elsewhere, if you're too retarded to discuss the matter like an adultForget it, James....You're a commie and there's no more hiding it.
Dude said:Hi, you have received -164 reputation points from Dude.
Reputation was given for this post.
Comment:
Fuck off, communist scum.
Regards,
Dude
Note: This is an automated message.
troll elsewhere, if you're too retarded to discuss the matter like an adultForget it, James....You're a commie and there's no more hiding it.Dude said:Hi, you have received -164 reputation points from Dude.
Reputation was given for this post.
Comment:
Fuck off, communist scum.
Regards,
Dude
Note: This is an automated message.
I see.
Come back when you've grown up and discuss things like an adult and not a pathetic child who's seen too much Glenn Beck and decides to call everyone who calls for scaling back the Fed a Communist.
It is possible that I could have said some of that when addressing a different context though I think you are erroneously attributing at least some remarks of others to me. But unless you can show where I said any of that within this context, I am not obligated to admit anything.
You've been linking people to it with your supermarket example. You went even further and spoke of them micromanaging the fishing companies, the canneries, and the trucking companies as well.
That falls within promoting the general welfare.
'General Welfare', huh?
O RLY?
So we shouldn't have any law [codified ethics]? No laws against rape, murder, or theft? Those are laws that codify our common ethics, which are in turn rooted in both self interest and personal morality.
. Securing the rights of the people is the responsibility of government
THat's not what you just said
Ethics is not the responsibility of government other than for government to enforce ethical standards for its own behavior
troll elsewhere, if you're too retarded to discuss the matter like an adultDude said:Hi, you have received -164 reputation points from Dude.
Reputation was given for this post.
Comment:
Fuck off, communist scum.
Regards,
Dude
Note: This is an automated message.
I see.
Come back when you've grown up and discuss things like an adult and not a pathetic child who's seen too much Glenn Beck and decides to call everyone who calls for scaling back the Fed a Communist.
Just to be fair--and I'm probably being a little bit of an asshole--you did call libertarians retards in that other thread.
I have been 100% consistent on ALL threads that our government was intended to secure our rights. Ethics is a separate issue.
Whether to protect any 'rights' is matter of ethicsRape, murder et are not issues of ethics where government is concerned but are issues of violation of our unalienable rights.
Morality =/= EthicsIf you don't see the difference between ethics, i.e. moral choices
Something can be normal or abnormal independent of whether society considers it ethical or unethical (or neither) or whether a given individual considers is moral, immoral, or amoral.or the cultural norm
So it seems.there's no point in continuing the discussion because we will each be speaking of entirely different things.
So it seems.there's no point in continuing the discussion because we will each be speaking of entirely different things.
I speak of reality and Lord only know what you're going on about.
A lot of people have been in agreement with you, more or less, until the point it became clear that you're a communist.
I agree on the note regarding subsidies and have stated in the past that I disagree on principle with 'morality taxes' or other taxes, tariffs, or other fees or fines against specific products..
The information should be readily available and people should be allowed to decide for themselves
ridding the system of abuse and unjust, unnecessary, and counterproductive laws, regulation, and practices.
Again read the essay linked (above in this post) and you'll see laizzez-faire as Adam Smith and other proponents of the process saw it.
so FDR wasn't dead in 49-50? why do you bother, rabbi? you've not made a cogent argument yet.
I dont know why I bother. You are so thoroughly worthless as an intellect it is like debating a hand puppet.
In fact, I think I'll toss you over to iggy with your pal Shogun so i don't have to waste my time on you.
Just saying...
Anyone consider had we just left these big corporations alone, fail and then eventually recover, instead of propping them up... That we may have been way better off?
Just saying...
Anyone consider had we just left these big corporations alone, fail and then eventually recover, instead of propping them up... That we may have been way better off?
Uhh... Laissez faire? Not in this century pal.
Not last century either.
Again read the essay linked (above in this post) and you'll see laizzez-faire as Adam Smith and other proponents of the process saw it.
adam smith is not a laissez-fair economist!
profound.Again read the essay linked (above in this post) and you'll see laizzez-faire as Adam Smith and other proponents of the process saw it.
adam smith is not a laissez-fair economist!
That's right he was not remotely a laissez-fair econmist.
People who imagine he was never read his work.
They're depending on some apologists for the system we have now to do their reading *(and thinking) for them.