Artevelde
Senior Member
Perhapps a better question is "what business of your is it what law abiding, tax paying g citizens do in their bedrooms?"Given the FACT that human reproduction requires intercourse between a man (donor) and a woman(host) isn't "gayness" a learned, or behavior modification i.e. "nature vs nurture"?
I mean researchers still haven't found a "dominate" GAY gene.
So existing gays are totally a "learned" or behavior modification response.
Furthermore...what right do you have to dictate who can legally express their love for one another via a legally binding ceremony?
I guess liberty and the constitution is only ok when it suits your agenda.
You are making a big leap between your first point and your second.
That society and the state shouldn't interfere in private intercourse between two consenting adults is one thing.
To say society and the state have no role with regards to a "legally binding ceremony" is of course complete nonsense.