Questioner
Senior Member
- Nov 26, 2019
- 1,593
- 86
- 50
- Banned
- #1
Anarchist libertarians believe that "no government" should exist (which is an impossibility, since even in hunter-gatherer tribes where there is no formal law or legislation, there is still informal "governance", hierarchy, rules and so forth, much as in other informal institutions such as families, or in the contest of private institutions and businesses).
As absurd and as impossible as this is except in pure dreams or abstraction, akin to Utopian Marxism, the reality is that the 'dark' side of human nature is well-documented, whether by criminologists, legislators, theologians, philosophiers, fields such as evolutionary psychology, or otherwise.
Theoretically, this means that said anarchist libertarians would want a "society" where rapists, murderers, child molesters, are free to prey on others, lacking any formal law, civil rights, or policing or enforcing of said rights, akin to 3rd world countries and places ripe with savagery - based on this, I can potentially see reasons why anarchist libertarians should be considered the same as pro-pedophile organizations like NAMBLA, and if not banned outright, should be stigmatized and made into one of society's deplorable groups.
Anyone promoting a degenerate, anarchist worldview, or anything akin to moral nihilism, deserves no rights whatsoever, anymore than an animal does; every serious student of government understands that systems of government, with checks and balances in relation to power, are necessary to preserve what rights (and wrongs) we currently have, and that sacrifice is necessary for the preservation of said rights, lest the immoral and degenerate end up having more of an unnecessary say in things than they do already, the popular vote or the "mob vote", for example, potentially being a mistake entirely
As absurd and as impossible as this is except in pure dreams or abstraction, akin to Utopian Marxism, the reality is that the 'dark' side of human nature is well-documented, whether by criminologists, legislators, theologians, philosophiers, fields such as evolutionary psychology, or otherwise.
Theoretically, this means that said anarchist libertarians would want a "society" where rapists, murderers, child molesters, are free to prey on others, lacking any formal law, civil rights, or policing or enforcing of said rights, akin to 3rd world countries and places ripe with savagery - based on this, I can potentially see reasons why anarchist libertarians should be considered the same as pro-pedophile organizations like NAMBLA, and if not banned outright, should be stigmatized and made into one of society's deplorable groups.
Anyone promoting a degenerate, anarchist worldview, or anything akin to moral nihilism, deserves no rights whatsoever, anymore than an animal does; every serious student of government understands that systems of government, with checks and balances in relation to power, are necessary to preserve what rights (and wrongs) we currently have, and that sacrifice is necessary for the preservation of said rights, lest the immoral and degenerate end up having more of an unnecessary say in things than they do already, the popular vote or the "mob vote", for example, potentially being a mistake entirely