Argument for putting women in burkas

[IndependantAce]

In most traditional cultures a man had to prove his overall social worth before he could gain access to an attractive woman; in some Native American tribes for example a man wasn't even allowed to court a woman unless he had proven himself in a hunt or a fight.

And this likely benefited the economy as well, since it motivated men to "man up" and do something useful with the hope of getting a wife for his effort.

Today however women often dress immodestly in public and are very easy overall, plus adult entertainment industries provide easy sexual access to anyone willing to pay.

Basically it's sexual affirmative action, now all a man has to do to see an attractive woman is turn on his computer, so it'll likely hurt the economy in a long run when a man is no longer willing to be a man and do productive things.

So ironically if we made women wear burkas in public and eliminated the adult entertainment industry it might actually benefit the economy in the long run; the lazy welfare recipient couldn't just stare at the hottie outside his home or search for free porn online, he'd have to actually do something productive with his life in order to find a woman to bed.

 

[Gracie]

Over my dead body. And you better make damn sure I AM dead cuz I'll come lookin' for ya when ya least expect it. (You, as in general you).

End of argument.

 

[BluesLegend]

 

[IndependantAce]

I don't think nature intended for men to be voyeurs toward women without having to actually do anything productive to gain sexual access; it's an example of how modern culture has violated natural order.

And could be playing a role in the current state of the economy, since male sex drive has traditionally played a large role in their desire to be economically productive; when they can simply pleasure themselves to nude pictures on the internet it's cheating the system.

I suspect that when the American economy collapses because it's people become too over saturated with simple pleasures to support themselves, it's going to take a step "backward" in this direction anyway; much like Rome and the Barbarians.

 

[IndependantAce]

Hey when the Islamic world sees that the west is marketing degenerate entertainment like this to children, it's actually pretty hard to blame them for hating America:

[

 

[westwall]

In most traditional cultures a man had to prove his overall social worth before he could gain access to an attractive woman; in some Native American tribes for example a man wasn't even allowed to court a woman unless he had proven himself in a hunt or a fight.

And this likely benefited the economy as well, since it motivated men to "man up" and do something useful with the hope of getting a wife for his effort.

Today however women often dress immodestly in public and are very easy overall, plus adult entertainment industries provide easy sexual access to anyone willing to pay.

Basically it's sexual affirmative action, now all a man has to do to see an attractive woman is turn on his computer, so it'll likely hurt the economy in a long run when a man is no longer willing to be a man and do productive things.

So ironically if we made women wear burkas in public and eliminated the adult entertainment industry it might actually benefit the economy in the long run; the lazy welfare recipient couldn't just stare at the hottie outside his home or search for free porn online, he'd have to actually do something productive with his life in order to find a woman to bed.

This is one of the most ridiculous posts I have ever read.

 

[IndependantAce]

Burkas might be a little extreme

 

[HUGGY]

I think the OP has a point worth discussing. I for one have always resented the idea that we should all be raised up as good little consumers for those that own the means to access to necessary commodities. In the Mid East the big shots are buying up all the water rights to put the squeeze on the average person.

 

[HUGGY]

Burkas might be a little extreme

What's the difference? When you turn off the lights they all look the same..

 

[there4eyeM]

It is interesting and stimulating to be provocative. Occasionally a 'radical' proposal such as this pushes us to re-examine a situation.
This, however, is not such an example.
As Gracie said, "Case closed!"

 

[Slade3200]

In most traditional cultures a man had to prove his overall social worth before he could gain access to an attractive woman; in some Native American tribes for example a man wasn't even allowed to court a woman unless he had proven himself in a hunt or a fight.

And this likely benefited the economy as well, since it motivated men to "man up" and do something useful with the hope of getting a wife for his effort.

Today however women often dress immodestly in public and are very easy overall, plus adult entertainment industries provide easy sexual access to anyone willing to pay.

Basically it's sexual affirmative action, now all a man has to do to see an attractive woman is turn on his computer, so it'll likely hurt the economy in a long run when a man is no longer willing to be a man and do productive things.

So ironically if we made women wear burkas in public and eliminated the adult entertainment industry it might actually benefit the economy in the long run; the lazy welfare recipient couldn't just stare at the hottie outside his home or search for free porn online, he'd have to actually do something productive with his life in order to find a woman to bed.

I think they do that in the Middle East. Is that your utopia?

 

[The Great Goose]

In most traditional cultures a man had to prove his overall social worth before he could gain access to an attractive woman; in some Native American tribes for example a man wasn't even allowed to court a woman unless he had proven himself in a hunt or a fight.

And this likely benefited the economy as well, since it motivated men to "man up" and do something useful with the hope of getting a wife for his effort.

Today however women often dress immodestly in public and are very easy overall, plus adult entertainment industries provide easy sexual access to anyone willing to pay.

Basically it's sexual affirmative action, now all a man has to do to see an attractive woman is turn on his computer, so it'll likely hurt the economy in a long run when a man is no longer willing to be a man and do productive things.

So ironically if we made women wear burkas in public and eliminated the adult entertainment industry it might actually benefit the economy in the long run; the lazy welfare recipient couldn't just stare at the hottie outside his home or search for free porn online, he'd have to actually do something productive with his life in order to find a woman to bed.

a most thoughtful OP.

I notice in these primitive cultures a man is required to be alpha to get breeding rights. whereas today, we imprison alphas and give breeding rights to submissive, work slave betas.

Your idea would most certainly benefit the economy! The cheapening of virginity, homemaking and motherhood has certainly turned our economy into a bubble, that will crash.

But we would still be becoming a more feminine race than primitive cultures, due to "manning up" in civilization requires submission to employers and the law, etc etc etc

 

[The Great Goose]

Burkas might be a little extreme

I think men should "Lord" over their women. Many western men still do act bombastic in the home. It was a good system and it worked.

 

[The Great Goose]

Hey when the Islamic world sees that the west is marketing degenerate entertainment like this to children, it's actually pretty hard to blame them for hating America:

[

not a very "fetching" young lady is she?

 

[S.J.]

Native American tribes for example a man wasn't even allowed to court a woman unless he had proven himself in a hunt or a fight.

Aren't they like, nearly extinct now?

 

[Ozone]

the consumer market for instant gratification is probably the symptom and not the cause of the downfall of civilization, and that those who expose the true cause will gather the wrath of the agents of chaos around them pretty quickly.

 

[Norman]

In most traditional cultures a man had to prove his overall social worth before he could gain access to an attractive woman; in some Native American tribes for example a man wasn't even allowed to court a woman unless he had proven himself in a hunt or a fight.

And this likely benefited the economy as well, since it motivated men to "man up" and do something useful with the hope of getting a wife for his effort.

Today however women often dress immodestly in public and are very easy overall, plus adult entertainment industries provide easy sexual access to anyone willing to pay.

Basically it's sexual affirmative action, now all a man has to do to see an attractive woman is turn on his computer, so it'll likely hurt the economy in a long run when a man is no longer willing to be a man and do productive things.

So ironically if we made women wear burkas in public and eliminated the adult entertainment industry it might actually benefit the economy in the long run; the lazy welfare recipient couldn't just stare at the hottie outside his home or search for free porn online, he'd have to actually do something productive with his life in order to find a woman to bed.

What the hell... I am not sure if you are a lib who thinks Islam is actually a great idea, but if you aren't. Please, tell me that this colossal piece of Islam apology is pure sarcasm?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Op is clinical or a dumbass towel head. Either way welcome to the irrelevant list.

And one of your fellow conservatives.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Burkas might be a little extreme

No, feel free to express yourself as a social conservative – it’s actually refreshing to hear a rightist be honest about his contempt for the Constitution, its case law, the rule of law, and the rights and protected liberties of his fellow citizens.

So whether it's murdering ‘abortion doctors,’ forcing women to give birth against their will, or compelling women to wear Burkas, it’s good to hear confirmation from social conservatives themselves about their agenda to increase the size and authority of government at the expense of individual liberty.

 

[Norman]

Burkas might be a little extreme

No, feel free to express yourself as a social conservative – it’s actually refreshing to hear a rightist be honest about his contempt for the Constitution, its case law, the rule of law, and the rights and protected liberties of his fellow citizens.

So whether it's murdering ‘abortion doctors,’ forcing women to give birth against their will, or compelling women to wear Burkas, it’s good to hear confirmation from social conservatives themselves about their agenda to increase the size and authority of government at the expense of individual liberty.

Says the pro-Islam liberal.

No, most conservatives do NOT support this idea. I don't think he is serious, but if he is, then he's the rare conservative who is as retarded as the libs such as yourself here.