Arizona House passes bill that nullifies all of Obama's executive orders.

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
May 13, 2012
20,232
2,368
We need a return to states rights. When the founding fathers wrote the constitution they never envisioned a federal govt like we have today that places itself above the states. They meant for feds to exist alongside and maybe a little below the states. Like the european union is now.

Arizona Passes Two Bills Aimed At Blocking Federal Laws

March 14, 2015
House Bill 2368, introduced by Republican Representative Bob Thorpe of Flagstaff, Arizona, was passed this Wednesday by the Arizona House. House Bill 2368 seeks to bar the state of Arizona from funding any executive orders issued by President Obama, or policy directives issued by the Department of Justice.

According to the Arizona State Legislature website, the bill includes the following provisions:

"1. Prohibits this state or any of its political subdivisions from using any personnel or financial resources to enforce, administer or cooperate with an executive order issued by the President of the U.S. that has not been affirmed by a vote of Congress and signed into law as prescribed by the U.S. Constitution.

2. Prohibits this state or any of its political subdivisions from using any personnel or financial resources to enforce, administer or cooperate with a policy directive issued by the U.S. DOJ to law enforcement agencies in this state that has not been affirmed by a vote of Congress and signed into law as prescribed by the U.S. Constitution."

If the bill becomes a law, Arizona would essentially be independent of federal laws.
 
The first president George Washington is the one that started with the EO's..if they had not wanted it, they would not have allowed it....
 
This is big. Anyone know if the senate is likely to pass this and the governor to sign it?
 
If it becomes law look for Holder (or who/what ever succeeds him) to devote 100% of the so-called "Justice" Department's resources to overturning it. Completely crowding out funding for any prosecution of cop-killers of ANY race. See, that'd promote equality.

Think Lib!

But do it sitting down.
 
The first president George Washington is the one that started with the EO's..if they had not wanted it, they would not have allowed it....

EOs are meant for a president to explain how he's going to enforce the law and if obozo did that, it would be ok. But O uses them to write new laws or to explain how he's NOT going to enforce the law - as with his amnesty of illegals.

Obozo has totally perverted EOs. THINK
 
The first president George Washington is the one that started with the EO's..if they had not wanted it, they would not have allowed it....

EOs are meant for a president to explain how he's going to enforce the law and if obozo did that, it would be ok. But O uses them to write new laws or to explain how he's NOT going to enforce the law - as with his amnesty of illegals.

Obozo has totally perverted EOs. THINK
So did George, the EO was created to be used to enhance on current laws, something Oblama has done within his limitations, if not then he could be sued and the order rescinded....
 
The first president George Washington is the one that started with the EO's..if they had not wanted it, they would not have allowed it....

EOs are meant for a president to explain how he's going to enforce the law and if obozo did that, it would be ok. But O uses them to write new laws or to explain how he's NOT going to enforce the law - as with his amnesty of illegals.

Obozo has totally perverted EOs. THINK
So did George, the EO was created to be used to enhance on current laws, something Oblama has done within his limitations, if not then he could be sued and the order rescinded....

No, executive orders cannot "enhance" current laws. Laws are passed by Congress with specific wording that cannot be added to or subtracted from. The executive branch has to......wait for it......EXECUTE those laws passed by Congress, not make up his own laws.
 
We've been a thorn in the halfrican's ass from the beginning....

Gov-Jan-Brewer-releases-Obama-letter-HATAQF6-x-large.jpg
 
The first president George Washington is the one that started with the EO's..if they had not wanted it, they would not have allowed it....

EOs are meant for a president to explain how he's going to enforce the law and if obozo did that, it would be ok. But O uses them to write new laws or to explain how he's NOT going to enforce the law - as with his amnesty of illegals.

Obozo has totally perverted EOs. THINK
So did George, the EO was created to be used to enhance on current laws, something Oblama has done within his limitations, if not then he could be sued and the order rescinded....

No, executive orders cannot "enhance" current laws. Laws are passed by Congress with specific wording that cannot be added to or subtracted from. The executive branch has to......wait for it......EXECUTE those laws passed by Congress, not make up his own laws.
A presidential executive order (EO) is a directive issued to federal agencies, department heads, or other federal employees by the President of the United States under his statutory or constitutional powers .
 
So did George, the EO was created to be used to enhance on current laws, something Oblama has done within his limitations, if not then he could be sued and the order rescinded....

HAHAHA. Using an EO to "enhance" a law means rewriting it and obozo is not supposed to do that, though he does it all the time and the bought-off GOP does nothing.
 
It's always funny when the right wing pulls this kind of stupid shit. Remember when the house passed a bill that said the Senate or the President didn't have to act for a bill to become a law? They actually thought they could just change the Constitution on a whim. Pure stupidity.......just like this.
 
So did George, the EO was created to be used to enhance on current laws, something Oblama has done within his limitations, if not then he could be sued and the order rescinded....

HAHAHA. Using an EO to "enhance" a law means rewriting it and obozo is not supposed to do that, though he does it all the time and the bought-off GOP does nothing.
Well the GOP has tried to sue over it but has gone no where, they are unsound for causation of jurisprudence.......
 
So did George, the EO was created to be used to enhance on current laws, something Oblama has done within his limitations, if not then he could be sued and the order rescinded....

HAHAHA. Using an EO to "enhance" a law means rewriting it and obozo is not supposed to do that, though he does it all the time and the bought-off GOP does nothing.
Well the GOP has tried to sue over it but has gone no where, they are unsound for causation of jurisprudence.......


Nuts too.
 
Well the GOP has tried to sue over it but has gone no where, they are unsound for causation of jurisprudence.......

I'm not aware the GOP sued over amnesty. I know the states did and they got an injunction to stop amnesty, so that appears to be working. Hard to see how any court can support the president's plan to give illegals a certificate saying they can live and work here even though the law says they can do neither.
 
Well the GOP has tried to sue over it but has gone no where, they are unsound for causation of jurisprudence.......

I'm not aware the GOP sued over amnesty. I know the states did and they got an injunction to stop amnesty, so that appears to be working. Hard to see how any court can support the president's plan to give illegals a certificate saying they can live and work here even though the law says they can do neither.
Well it was a stretch for Oblama to try,, but I am glad they stopped it......
 

Forum List

Back
Top