DGS49
Diamond Member
- Apr 12, 2012
- 16,418
- 14,375
We are to understand that Native Americans (or "Injuns," if you prefer) are offended at the names of many sports teams because they sully certain tribes or the native American peoples as a whole. "Redskins," "Braves," "Illini," fair enough. Change those names without delay.
I am an American Roman Catholic, and I have a similar and even more profound problem with the naming of thousands of American Cities.
You may be aware that the City we call, "Los Angeles," is actually, "El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles," meaning literally, "The City of Our Lady, Queen of the Angels."
Well.
The aforementioned city has become, relative to current and historical Roman Catholic teaching, a moral cesspool, where sexual perversion, pornography, indecency, drug abuse, hedonism, self-indulgence, and sexual promiscuity are not only tolerated but CELEBRATED, both in real life, and in the "art" that originates in that den of iniquity. Its continuing to go by the historical name, "Los Angeles," is a monumental affront to the Roman Catholic Church, an insult to the brave, pious missionaries who founded the City, and a slap in the face of contemporary Roman Catholics who must endure the indignity of having this moral septic tank referred to daily as the city of Our Lady, Queen of the Angels.
They need to get a new, different name.
And what about San Francisco? A City named for one of the great Catholic saints, known for his piety and diligence in obedience to the Word of God - and it remains the name of, basically, the capital of sodomy in the United States. Get another name!
Sacramento? Sacreligious!
California is the worst offender in sullying the names of Roman Catholic saints, Our Lord, and other things held holy by the Church, but many other states are similarly guilty. "Corpus Christi" (The Body of Christ) Texas? Are you kidding me?
Seriously, there needs to be a wave of non-religious re-naming throughout the United States. Doesn't the U.S. Constitution forbid the mixing of Church & State (or something like that)?
The time has come. Let San Francisco become "Sodom." Truth in advertising, and all that.
I am an American Roman Catholic, and I have a similar and even more profound problem with the naming of thousands of American Cities.
You may be aware that the City we call, "Los Angeles," is actually, "El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles," meaning literally, "The City of Our Lady, Queen of the Angels."
Well.
The aforementioned city has become, relative to current and historical Roman Catholic teaching, a moral cesspool, where sexual perversion, pornography, indecency, drug abuse, hedonism, self-indulgence, and sexual promiscuity are not only tolerated but CELEBRATED, both in real life, and in the "art" that originates in that den of iniquity. Its continuing to go by the historical name, "Los Angeles," is a monumental affront to the Roman Catholic Church, an insult to the brave, pious missionaries who founded the City, and a slap in the face of contemporary Roman Catholics who must endure the indignity of having this moral septic tank referred to daily as the city of Our Lady, Queen of the Angels.
They need to get a new, different name.
And what about San Francisco? A City named for one of the great Catholic saints, known for his piety and diligence in obedience to the Word of God - and it remains the name of, basically, the capital of sodomy in the United States. Get another name!
Sacramento? Sacreligious!
California is the worst offender in sullying the names of Roman Catholic saints, Our Lord, and other things held holy by the Church, but many other states are similarly guilty. "Corpus Christi" (The Body of Christ) Texas? Are you kidding me?
Seriously, there needs to be a wave of non-religious re-naming throughout the United States. Doesn't the U.S. Constitution forbid the mixing of Church & State (or something like that)?
The time has come. Let San Francisco become "Sodom." Truth in advertising, and all that.