As much as I despise the GOP and ultimately think they are poison in comparison to democrats...

[Pogo]

There is no reason why Bernie should be the nominee considering he’s not really a Democrat

You don't have to be a Democrat (or Republican, etc) to be nominated by the party.

Who was the Democratic candidate in 1872?

 

[Hossfly]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

They don't have "superdelegates" no. They just cancel entire state primaries. That eliminates all competition altogether. Because Deer Leader can't have competition, that would never do.

Who is in competition with The Donald?

 

[Pogo]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

They don't have "superdelegates" no. They just cancel entire state primaries. That eliminates all competition altogether. Because Deer Leader can't have competition, that would never do.

Who is in competition with The Donald?

Glad you asked.

 

[kyzr]

The people decided the Presidential election in 2016 yet some still can't accept it to this day.

The electoral college, not the people.

The electoral college is the people, state by state.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

They don't have "superdelegates" no. They just cancel entire state primaries. That eliminates all competition altogether. Because Deer Leader can't have competition, that would never do.

There was, and is, no competition.

 

[Pogo]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

They don't have "superdelegates" no. They just cancel entire state primaries. That eliminates all competition altogether. Because Deer Leader can't have competition, that would never do.

There was, and is, no competition.

I know you wish there were not, but that's irrelevant.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

They don't have "superdelegates" no. They just cancel entire state primaries. That eliminates all competition altogether. Because Deer Leader can't have competition, that would never do.

There was, and is, no competition.

I know you wish there were not, but that's irrelevant.

Okay.

Who are they?

 

[Pogo]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

They don't have "superdelegates" no. They just cancel entire state primaries. That eliminates all competition altogether. Because Deer Leader can't have competition, that would never do.

There was, and is, no competition.

I know you wish there were not, but that's irrelevant.

Okay.

Who are they?

What do you do, forget EVERYTHING that happened the previous day??

I just linked it for Hoss above. You can click it too.

You won't though. 'Cause you're skeered.

 

[Hossfly]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

They don't have "superdelegates" no. They just cancel entire state primaries. That eliminates all competition altogether. Because Deer Leader can't have competition, that would never do.

Who is in competition with The Donald?

Glad you asked.

What would be the reason to hold a primary with only one candidate on the ballot?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

They don't have "superdelegates" no. They just cancel entire state primaries. That eliminates all competition altogether. Because Deer Leader can't have competition, that would never do.

There was, and is, no competition.

I know you wish there were not, but that's irrelevant.

Okay.

Who are they?

What do you do, forget EVERYTHING that happened the previous day??

I just linked it for Hoss above. You can click it too.

You won't though. 'Cause you're skeered.

 

[blackhawk]

The people decided the Presidential election in 2016 yet some still can't accept it to this day.

The electoral college, not the people.

Incorrect and that argument always will be.

If 6 people voted for an apple, and 4 people voted for a banana; what did the people vote to eat?

Sorry your apples and oranges response does not hold water.

 

[Pogo]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

They don't have "superdelegates" no. They just cancel entire state primaries. That eliminates all competition altogether. Because Deer Leader can't have competition, that would never do.

Who is in competition with The Donald?

Glad you asked.

What would be the reason to hold a primary with only one candidate on the ballot?

That would be pointless.

In fact I noted yesterday, last time there was an incumbent running for re-election, if I wanted to vote in the Democratic primary here my choices would have been "Barack O'bama" or "Uncommitted". So I voted in the Republican one. Might as well get something done.

I'll prolly do that this time too.

Oh and there are (at least) four candidates. As my link already showed you.

 

[francoHFW]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.

How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.

Black people aren't even liberal but they know which party is full of racists. The federal government is responsible for conditions. As much as or more than the cities. What a load of crap, brainwashed functional moron

 

[westwall]

I admire how the republicans only let republicans into their primary.

Kind a like how Dems are only allowed into Democrat primaries.

 

[francoHFW]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.

How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.

I think the super delegates in 2016 would have voted for Bernie if he had beaten Hillary and I think they will vote for him now. I'm just happy people are finding out what socialism means not the fear-mongering GOP version.

 

[Hossfly]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

They don't have "superdelegates" no. They just cancel entire state primaries. That eliminates all competition altogether. Because Deer Leader can't have competition, that would never do.

Who is in competition with The Donald?

Glad you asked.

What would be the reason to hold a primary with only one candidate on the ballot?

That would be pointless.

In fact I noted yesterday, last time there was an incumbent running for re-election, if I wanted to vote in the Democratic primary here my choices would have been "Barack O'bama" or "Uncommitted". So I voted in the Republican one. Might as well get something done.

I'll prolly do that this time too.

Oh and there are (at least) four candidates. As my link already showed you.

But have those four met the criteria and if so, how can the state party cancel the primary?

 

[Dale Smith]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.

How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.

I think the super delegates in 2016 would have voted for Bernie if he had beaten Hillary and I think they will vote for him now. I'm just happy people are finding out what socialism means not the fear-mongering GOP version.

Sanders is a fabian socialist and none of his ideas to "share the wealth" are feasible no matter how he intends to finance it under the banner of "for the greater good". When you borrow (or in this case steal) from Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on the support of Paul. Sanders has never addressed the elephant in the room which is the PRIVATELY OWNED Central bank that is the Federal Reserve which by the way would only be more than happy to increase the debt of USA.INC until it collapses under the weight of unsecured debt.

You really are ignorant of the end game and how this debt based system actually works.

 

[shockedcanadian]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

I have to wonder though, if deciding that some wealthy donors will dictate their leaders, basically the same types of systems found in Fiefdoms, why would ANYONE support the party?

The run up is nothing more than a mirage? Hoping that the guy who gets the most votes will be supported by the kings and queens of the superdelegates?

I recall after Hillary was soundly crushed they said "we promise to get rid of this". So what happened? Just as NYT said they would be more fair to Trump. Both made nice outreach shortly after the loss, then decided "naw, just kidding". Who wins with such an approach?

If you want to force the Dems to change, Vote Trump. They will be forced to become democratic, ironically as their name suggests and not an oligarch of power determining your leader. What worked for them in the past won't work going forward, Americans want choices...THEIR choices.

 

[Pogo]

They don't have "superdelegates" no. They just cancel entire state primaries. That eliminates all competition altogether. Because Deer Leader can't have competition, that would never do.

Who is in competition with The Donald?

Glad you asked.

What would be the reason to hold a primary with only one candidate on the ballot?

That would be pointless.

In fact I noted yesterday, last time there was an incumbent running for re-election, if I wanted to vote in the Democratic primary here my choices would have been "Barack O'bama" or "Uncommitted". So I voted in the Republican one. Might as well get something done.

I'll prolly do that this time too.

Oh and there are (at least) four candidates. As my link already showed you.

But have those four met the criteria and if so, how can the state party cancel the primary?

Criteria vary in every state of course* but if the party cancels the primary it doesn't matter does it.

*they generally require X number of signatures in support of that person's candidacy. All three of the guys in my link are national-profile well-known Republicans

 

[Pogo]

...I’ll give them credit for one thing.

They don’t have a superdelegate system.

Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.

I have to wonder though, if deciding that some wealthy donors will dictate their leaders, basically the same types of systems found in Fiefdoms, why would ANYONE support the party?

The run up is nothing more than a mirage? Hoping that the guy who gets the most votes will be supported by the kings and queens of the superdelegates?

I recall after Hillary was soundly crushed they said "we promise to get rid of this". So what happened? Just as NYT said they would be more fair to Trump. Both made nice outreach shortly after the loss, then decided "naw, just kidding". Who wins with such an approach?

If you want to force the Dems to change, Vote Trump. They will be forced to become democratic, ironically as their name suggests and not an oligarch of power determining your leader. What worked for them in the past won't work going forward, Americans want choices...THEIR choices.

Kinda hard to make that credible when the RP is cancelling primaries left and right to keep out challengers while Harry Reid is calling for all-primaries all-the time.

Guess you wouldn't know about that, being, you know, "Canadian" and all wink.