Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since the DAY the Constitution was ratified the President has been ELECTED via the electoral college. Pretty simply concept. Each State has x amount of electors, in order to win you need more then half of them to vote for you. How do you get electors? By winning State elections on Election day. Except 2 States all States have winner take all elector rules.
If Hillary Clinton was TOO STUPID to campaign in enough States to win them then the people DID IN FACT vote in Trump. The popular vote is meaningless EXCEPT inside an individual State. It does not matter if the entire state of New York and California vote for one person you need to win in enough States to garner enough electoral votes.
Whelp, that's not accurate either.
Take that infamous trio of states that pushed Rump over the hump in 2016 by a combined margin of 77,000 votes, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan. *NOBODY* won the state vote of any of those states. Nor did anybody win this state (North Carolina). Nor did any candidate with the vote of Florida, Virginia, Minnesota, Colorado, Arizona or Utah. Yet every one sent 100% of their electoral votes to a candidate who could not win even half that state's vote.
From what I can see, Trump won higher percentages in those states and most states have winner take all rules. Seems fair enough. If Hillary wins a higher percentage in Florida she gets all the electoral votes.
Because they suck. Tammany Hall was the home of Democrats....I’ll give them credit for one thing.
They don’t have a superdelegate system.
Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.
Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.
How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.
...I’ll give them credit for one thing.
They don’t have a superdelegate system.
Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.
Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.
How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.
Joke now. Cry later.Bernie will be the next President. Not to worry OP.
Sent from my SM-N976V using Tapatalk
I hear Venezuela could use a new President.
Maybe he can move there after Trump spanks him?
Joke now. Cry later.Bernie will be the next President. Not to worry OP.
Sent from my SM-N976V using Tapatalk
I hear Venezuela could use a new President.
Maybe he can move there after Trump spanks him?
#LOLGOP
Sent from my SM-N976V using Tapatalk
...I’ll give them credit for one thing.
They don’t have a superdelegate system.
Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.
Bernie has never been a DemocratI admire how the republicans only let republicans into their primary.
Kind a like how Dems are only allowed into Democrat primaries.
And all the cities Democrats run are crap holes....I’ll give them credit for one thing.
They don’t have a superdelegate system.
Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.
Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.
How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.
Actually most cities have nonpartisan elections. Because there's nothing "political party" or "right' or "left" about managing a city. Cute fantasy, but more bullshit.
You're right about part one though. Political parties are about amassing and consolidating power. That's uh, the reason they exist in the first place.
Electors? Here I thought we were talking about people. If you want to add obsolete, centuries old systems into the vote about a banana vs. an apple then the least you can do is answer the original question first.
And all the cities Democrats run are crap holes....I’ll give them credit for one thing.
They don’t have a superdelegate system.
Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.
Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.
How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.
Actually most cities have nonpartisan elections. Because there's nothing "political party" or "right' or "left" about managing a city. Cute fantasy, but more bullshit.
You're right about part one though. Political parties are about amassing and consolidating power. That's uh, the reason they exist in the first place.
Electors? Here I thought we were talking about people. If you want to add obsolete, centuries old systems into the vote about a banana vs. an apple then the least you can do is answer the original question first.
As you know, our Founding Fathers established the Electoral College for the STATES to elect the President of the United States. In order to allow for the difference in the sizes of the state, each state is given a number of electors based on the size of the state.
What could be fairer?
.
Elephant Do Do. The whole Machine in Chicago is Democrat. Always has been. That is why Chicago sucks.And all the cities Democrats run are crap holes....I’ll give them credit for one thing.
They don’t have a superdelegate system.
Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.
Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.
How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.
Actually most cities have nonpartisan elections. Because there's nothing "political party" or "right' or "left" about managing a city. Cute fantasy, but more bullshit.
You're right about part one though. Political parties are about amassing and consolidating power. That's uh, the reason they exist in the first place.
Again, for those who never learned to read, most cities elect their local governments on a nonpartisan basis. Because there's nothng in the world "Democratoc",. "Republican", "Whig", "Federalist" or any other party, about deciding which neighborhood gets its fucking trash picked up on Tuesdays. That's simple fucking management.
Y'all wannabe Composition Fallacists are SO pathetic.
Elephant Do Do. The whole Machine in Chicago is Democrat. Always has been. That is why Chicago sucks.And all the cities Democrats run are crap holes....I’ll give them credit for one thing.
They don’t have a superdelegate system.
Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.
Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.
How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.
Actually most cities have nonpartisan elections. Because there's nothing "political party" or "right' or "left" about managing a city. Cute fantasy, but more bullshit.
You're right about part one though. Political parties are about amassing and consolidating power. That's uh, the reason they exist in the first place.
Again, for those who never learned to read, most cities elect their local governments on a nonpartisan basis. Because there's nothng in the world "Democratoc",. "Republican", "Whig", "Federalist" or any other party, about deciding which neighborhood gets its fucking trash picked up on Tuesdays. That's simple fucking management.
Y'all wannabe Composition Fallacists are SO pathetic.
And all the cities Democrats run are crap holes....I’ll give them credit for one thing.
They don’t have a superdelegate system.
Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.
Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.
How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.
Actually most cities have nonpartisan elections. Because there's nothing "political party" or "right' or "left" about managing a city. Cute fantasy, but more bullshit.
You're right about part one though. Political parties are about amassing and consolidating power. That's uh, the reason they exist in the first place.
Again, for those who never learned to read, most cities elect their local governments on a nonpartisan basis. Because there's nothng in the world "Democratoc",. "Republican", "Whig", "Federalist" or any other party, about deciding which neighborhood gets its fucking trash picked up on Tuesdays. That's simple fucking management.
Y'all wannabe Composition Fallacists are SO pathetic.
Again, for those who never learned to read, most cities elect their local governments on a nonpartisan basis. Because there's nothng in the world "Democratoc",. "Republican", "Whig", "Federalist" or any other party, about deciding which neighborhood gets its fucking trash picked up on Tuesdays. That's simple fucking management.
Y'all wannabe Composition Fallacists are SO pathetic.
How about this? Which Party is really Anti-Woman? Look up Weinstein ,Ted Kennedy ,and Bill Clinton.Elephant Do Do. The whole Machine in Chicago is Democrat. Always has been. That is why Chicago sucks.And all the cities Democrats run are crap holes.Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.
How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.
Actually most cities have nonpartisan elections. Because there's nothing "political party" or "right' or "left" about managing a city. Cute fantasy, but more bullshit.
You're right about part one though. Political parties are about amassing and consolidating power. That's uh, the reason they exist in the first place.
Again, for those who never learned to read, most cities elect their local governments on a nonpartisan basis. Because there's nothng in the world "Democratoc",. "Republican", "Whig", "Federalist" or any other party, about deciding which neighborhood gets its fucking trash picked up on Tuesdays. That's simple fucking management.
Y'all wannabe Composition Fallacists are SO pathetic.
Again, absolute bullshit. See the link. Chicago is #3 --- nonpartisan.
Oh and as far as "always has been" that might come as a shock to Big Bill Thompson. He was voted out of office because he kept cozying up to Al Capone.
Sage advice -- do NOT fling bullshit in this direction. It WILL get flung back twice as hard.
Look you fucking RETARD the Majority of voters decide the electoral college in all States even the two that split the state by Congressional district. You can whine and cry all you want that is how our system works and HAS ALWAYS worked. Trump won and Clinton lost pretty simple concept, or perhaps you can point to a single US Presidential election that was EVER decided by who won the most votes? You can not because EVERY election was decided by the Electoral College. It has NEVER mattered who won the popular vote EXCEPT INSIDE an individual State.Since the DAY the Constitution was ratified the President has been ELECTED via the electoral college. Pretty simply concept. Each State has x amount of electors, in order to win you need more then half of them to vote for you. How do you get electors? By winning State elections on Election day. Except 2 States all States have winner take all elector rules.
If Hillary Clinton was TOO STUPID to campaign in enough States to win them then the people DID IN FACT vote in Trump. The popular vote is meaningless EXCEPT inside an individual State. It does not matter if the entire state of New York and California vote for one person you need to win in enough States to garner enough electoral votes.
Whelp, that's not accurate either.
Take that infamous trio of states that pushed Rump over the hump in 2016 by a combined margin of 77,000 votes, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan. *NOBODY* won the state vote of any of those states. Nor did anybody win this state (North Carolina). Nor did any candidate with the vote of Florida, Virginia, Minnesota, Colorado, Arizona or Utah. Yet every one sent 100% of their electoral votes to a candidate who could not win even half that state's vote.
Elephant Do Do. The whole Machine in Chicago is Democrat. Always has been. That is why Chicago sucks.And all the cities Democrats run are crap holes.Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.
How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.
Actually most cities have nonpartisan elections. Because there's nothing "political party" or "right' or "left" about managing a city. Cute fantasy, but more bullshit.
You're right about part one though. Political parties are about amassing and consolidating power. That's uh, the reason they exist in the first place.
Again, for those who never learned to read, most cities elect their local governments on a nonpartisan basis. Because there's nothng in the world "Democratoc",. "Republican", "Whig", "Federalist" or any other party, about deciding which neighborhood gets its fucking trash picked up on Tuesdays. That's simple fucking management.
Y'all wannabe Composition Fallacists are SO pathetic.
Again, absolute bullshit. See the link. Chicago is #3 --- nonpartisan.
Oh and as far as "always has been" that might come as a shock to Big Bill Thompson. He was voted out of office because he kept cozying up to Al Capone.
Sage advice -- do NOT fling bullshit in this direction. It WILL get flung back twice as hard.
Yesterday Biden stated that "Bernie's health care plan would cost 34 MILLION!!!!!!!!!!!!!! dollars!!!!!!!!!".______...I’ll give them credit for one thing.
They don’t have a superdelegate system.
Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.
Those Super-Delegates will cost Bloomburg a million dollars a pop---which he will pay, of course---but the Young Brainwashed Bernie Bolsheviks will be so pissed, they'll stay home for the general election, or even vote for the Bad Orange Man.
It's a lose-lose situation because Democrats are so dumb they couldn't see that Uncle Joe Biden is in early stage dementia or Alzheimer's. (A few real dumb-asses still don't.)
Democrats are going to have to work the "Russia Hacked the Election" scam yet again. They'll be filing law suits all over the day after the election.
What else have they got?
______
Most Bernie brown shirts couldn't even spell socialism.I think the super delegates in 2016 would have voted for Bernie if he had beaten Hillary and I think they will vote for him now. I'm just happy people are finding out what socialism means not the fear-mongering GOP version....I’ll give them credit for one thing.
They don’t have a superdelegate system.
Bernie will likely be the democratic nominee, but there’s still a small chance he won’t get the majority of delegates needed to be the winner and a contested convention would then occur. Those “superdelegates” who worship the DNC’s narrative might go for Bloomberg because they believe he can win against Trump, but they shouldn’t get the chance to decide. Bloomberg and those like him on the right represent all that is wrong with American politics. The people need to decide the election - not the billionaires.
Haven't you ever wondered why the Democrats have that system? It's about power, and the corruption necessary to obtain that power. That corruption pervades the Democrat Party, down to the local level.
How else do you think Democrats have stayed in control of most every city that has high crime, high murder rate, and a high poverty rate? Just look at Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc. They've been playing that game for hundreds of years, and they're not about to give it up.
