Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who said it's not the unorganized militia? That term never emerged until the fucking DICK ACT!!!There is no appeal to ignorance of express law. The first clause clearly proclaims what is necessary to the security of a free State and it is most definitely not, the unorganized militia of the People.FALSE!!!Only well regulated militia of the whole People, a few public officials excepted, have literal recourse to our Second Amendment when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union, unlike the unorganized militia of the rest of the whole People as Individuals.
There are no such qualifiers in the literal text of the 2A.
Let's look at grammar again, Dan:
A _______ being necessary for _____________, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
You can fill in the blanks with whatever the fuck you want and it will not change the operation of the 2A, PERIOD!!!! You cannot modify the 2A with the fucking Dick Act. Don't be stupid.
Historically inconsistent and incorrect.The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.Talk to your State legislators.The Second Amendment is, literally, part of the Constitution of the United States, and, literally, is what it is, to be interpreted as the letter of the law by people who can actually read.However did you come up with Your right wing fantasy and propaganda from a literal interpretation of our Second Amendment?
Golly gee whiz, I didn't "literally" commit a crime, but you and your ilk of left-wing fascists are still going to put me in prison because I might have "figuratively" committed a crime, but not "really" done anything wrong.
The letter of the law of the U.S. Constitution is not "right wing fantasy." Get off the weed and grow up.
We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
But if you do not prevent federal firearms laws from disarming the People, then you no longer have a free State any free states.
Then you have a federal dictatorship with arbitrary powers the people do not have and did not delegate.
A self authorizing federal government is the exact definition of an illegal dictatorship that is treason in a democratic republic.
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
Organized militia can muster at the local armory to get issued their Arms.
That's bullshit.No. Bit it is the only FEDERAL protection of them...as it regards to a Well Regulated Militia...no matter what Scalia said in his judicial activist rulingThe mention of a well-regulated militia or its necessity is not a bar to the people's gun rights.
Amendment II.The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
So how is it that machine guns are banned and regulated?The federal government is barred completely by the 2A. You fucking know that's the truth
You mean the four that I own?You just hate pissing yourself at the sight of a gun.
No. Bit it is the only FEDERAL protection of them...as it regards to a Well Regulated Militia...no matter what Scalia said in his judicial activist rulingThe mention of a well-regulated militia or its necessity is not a bar to the people's gun rights.
Only well regulated militia are expressly declared necessary not optional to the security of a free State.Well regulated militia of the People have literal recourse to our Second Amendment when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Uion, unlike the unorganized militia as Individuals of the People who are subject to the police power of their State.Well, well, well, what do you know? Another liar and another lawyer in trouble with the bar.
To wit, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, an absolute right which namely shall not be infringed, by federal, state, borough, municipal, county, city, or any other government.There are not any rights in the Bill of Rights, only restrictions on the federal government.
Subject only to the police power, the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. (Illinois State Constitution)
I don't get why you keep making "individuals" bold and italic because it destroys your argument?
And individual rights is supreme and can't ever be infringed upon by any legal of government.
There is nothing higher in law than an individual right.
So something that is an individual right like firearms, can not have any federal laws restricting it at all.
The unorganized militia has already proved itself to be worthless to the security of our free States.Talk to your State legislators.The Second Amendment is, literally, part of the Constitution of the United States, and, literally, is what it is, to be interpreted as the letter of the law by people who can actually read.However did you come up with Your right wing fantasy and propaganda from a literal interpretation of our Second Amendment?
Golly gee whiz, I didn't "literally" commit a crime, but you and your ilk of left-wing fascists are still going to put me in prison because I might have "figuratively" committed a crime, but not "really" done anything wrong.
The letter of the law of the U.S. Constitution is not "right wing fantasy." Get off the weed and grow up.
We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
The reason we should have no security problems in our free states is because the federal government is supposed to be prohibited from any jurisdiction.
Well regulated militia of the People have literal recourse to our Second Amendment when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. Only the unorganized militia complains about gun control laws meant specifically for them as individuals unconnected with the organized militia.Be that as it may, the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS -- with or without military conscription -- with or without any formal organization of “The Militia” -- with or without access to official government armories -- is absolute and SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.Organized militia can muster at the local armory to get issued their Arms.
There is no appeal to ignorance of the law. Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. It says so in our Second Amendment.You are infinging on a fundamental constitutional right of the people -- which shall not be infringed -- with all your marijuana-addled nonsense in a court of law.Well regulated militia of the People have literal recourse to our Second Amendment when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. Only the unorganized militia complains about gun control laws meant specifically for them as individuals unconnected with the organized militia.
Article 1 Section 8 clause 15/16 describes that Well Regulated MilitiaOnly well regulated militia are expressly declared necessary not optional to the security of a free State.Well regulated militia of the People have literal recourse to our Second Amendment when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Uion, unlike the unorganized militia as Individuals of the People who are subject to the police power of their State.Well, well, well, what do you know? Another liar and another lawyer in trouble with the bar.
To wit, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, an absolute right which namely shall not be infringed, by federal, state, borough, municipal, county, city, or any other government.There are not any rights in the Bill of Rights, only restrictions on the federal government.
Subject only to the police power, the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. (Illinois State Constitution)
I don't get why you keep making "individuals" bold and italic because it destroys your argument?
And individual rights is supreme and can't ever be infringed upon by any legal of government.
There is nothing higher in law than an individual right.
So something that is an individual right like firearms, can not have any federal laws restricting it at all.
Yes, and "well regulated" means armed and familiar with the use of those arms.
The "well regulated militia" is all of the people except for federal employees.
Isn't the national guard the state militia? A bunch of random yahoos with guns is neither a "state militia," nor is it "well regulated."
Mostly. Some states recognize several. Nothing wrong with joining a gun club if you want to learn how to safely and responsibly use firearms, or a knitting club.....whatever floats your boat!
That may or may not be true but has nothing to do with the 2AIsn't the national guard the state militia? A bunch of random yahoos with guns is neither a "state militia," nor is it "well regulated."
Mostly. Some states recognize several. Nothing wrong with joining a gun club if you want to learn how to safely and responsibly use firearms, or a knitting club.....whatever floats your boat!
Since there are over 1 million successful violent crimes a year according to the DOJ, then the MAIN point of gun rights are for individual defense and home defense. The reality is no state or country has actually been attacked since 1812.
It is the army and National Guard we could dispense with if we wanted to, not individua defense.
So how is it that machine guns are banned and regulated?The federal government is barred completely by the 2A. You fucking know that's the truth
You mean the four that I own?You just hate pissing yourself at the sight of a gun.
Federal laws does not ban machine guns,
A. You can not buy a machine gun made after 1986.they have made them too high priced for most people.
Which is totally and completely illegal.
Article 1 Section 8 clause 15/16 describes that Well Regulated MilitiaOnly well regulated militia are expressly declared necessary not optional to the security of a free State.Well regulated militia of the People have literal recourse to our Second Amendment when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Uion, unlike the unorganized militia as Individuals of the People who are subject to the police power of their State.Well, well, well, what do you know? Another liar and another lawyer in trouble with the bar.
To wit, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, an absolute right which namely shall not be infringed, by federal, state, borough, municipal, county, city, or any other government.There are not any rights in the Bill of Rights, only restrictions on the federal government.
Subject only to the police power, the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. (Illinois State Constitution)
I don't get why you keep making "individuals" bold and italic because it destroys your argument?
And individual rights is supreme and can't ever be infringed upon by any legal of government.
There is nothing higher in law than an individual right.
So something that is an individual right like firearms, can not have any federal laws restricting it at all.
Yes, and "well regulated" means armed and familiar with the use of those arms.
The "well regulated militia" is all of the people except for federal employees.
That may or may not be true but has nothing to do with the 2AIsn't the national guard the state militia? A bunch of random yahoos with guns is neither a "state militia," nor is it "well regulated."
Mostly. Some states recognize several. Nothing wrong with joining a gun club if you want to learn how to safely and responsibly use firearms, or a knitting club.....whatever floats your boat!
Since there are over 1 million successful violent crimes a year according to the DOJ, then the MAIN point of gun rights are for individual defense and home defense. The reality is no state or country has actually been attacked since 1812.
It is the army and National Guard we could dispense with if we wanted to, not individua defense.
It does not define what "well regulated" means.
It describes what a Well Regulated Militia is, what it's make up is, and it's uses.(Clause 15 – The Militia)
[The Congress shall have Power] To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
(Clause 16 – The Militia)
[The Congress shall have Power] To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
Wrong.Federal laws does not ban machine guns,
A. You can not buy a machine gun made after 1986.they have made them too high priced for most people.
Which is totally and completely illegal.
B. Take it to the SCOTUS. It's fact
It does not define what "well regulated" means.
It describes what a Well Regulated Militia is, what it's make up is, and it's uses.(Clause 15 – The Militia)
[The Congress shall have Power] To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
(Clause 16 – The Militia)
[The Congress shall have Power] To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
NONE match your claims
