Assholes making trouble in Oregon

[BlueGin]

Free logs, free ore and free grazing rights.

And of course, free rent. For 'years, if necessary'.

Yep, Skylar! Did you see the guy on TV that just joined up with the Bundy thugs? He has said goodbye to his family and claims he is willing to give his life if necessary for the 'cause'. It's one of those situations where you laugh at the absurdity, and cry at the stupidity.

Then he stated it would never get that far. .

So he said he would die there for no reason?

He said they were seeking peaceful negotiations. Not blood shed.

Get back to be when they call for the police to be "fried like bacon".

Not the guy I saw. He was in his car, dressed in what looked like a Carhart jacket and with a buzz cut. The clip I saw did not go beyond his willingness to lose his life. Perhaps you are thinking of someone else interviewed. Or maybe he was waffling after his first blurb and I missed the coverup.

Nope this guy was being interviewed by Megyn Kelly.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Whats the "free stuff" they're demanding?

Free logs, free ore and free grazing rights.

And of course, free rent. For 'years, if necessary'.

Yep, Skylar! Did you see the guy on TV that just joined up with the Bundy thugs? He has said goodbye to his family and claims he is willing to give his life if necessary for the 'cause'. It's one of those situations where you laugh at the absurdity, and cry at the stupidity.

Then he stated it would never get that far. .

So he said he would die there for no reason?

He said they were seeking peaceful negotiations. Not blood shed.

Get back to be when they call for the police to be "fried like bacon".

They want "peaceful negotiations" about their law breaking?

Why did they bring guns then?

They said they are willing to kill and/or be killed.

That's the opposite of "peaceful".

 

[Luddly Neddite]

They want the Fed's to surrender the property they stole to state control.

Who did they steal the land from. Name the original owners before the Feds owned it. Right here: ________________

Allie....when can we be expecting an answer as to who owned that land before the Feds?

As well as what peach174 said -

Feds holding and leasing BLM land is not abuse, but taking land that belongs to ranchers that holds deeds is.

This is a claim I have never heard before but I'm sure that peach174 will be along any minute now with a link.

Just like koshergrl will post links to her claim that this is not about getting use of land for free.

Right?

How ridiculous. Everybody else knows what the issue is....if you are too stupid to read the material please do everybody a favor and quit wasting bandwidth.

IOW, you're wrong and you know it.

Gotta go but if you can come up with some proof of your claim "They want the Fed's to surrender the property they stole to state control." (whatever THAT means!), by all means post it.

Prove that the land was stolen from the welfare ranchers.

Same to peach174

Still no facts from koshergrl or peach174

 

[Agit8r]

Again, it's not about grazing rights. You guys don't have a whole brain between you.

And yet, you can't say what they want.

Yeah, right.

You like to pretend you know everything about everything but when you're called on your know-it-all posts, you disappear or don't answer.

They want the Fed's to surrender the property they stole to state control.

Stole from whom? The Paiutes?

 

[koshergrl]

Who did they steal the land from. Name the original owners before the Feds owned it. Right here: ________________

Allie....when can we be expecting an answer as to who owned that land before the Feds?

As well as what peach174 said -

Feds holding and leasing BLM land is not abuse, but taking land that belongs to ranchers that holds deeds is.

This is a claim I have never heard before but I'm sure that peach174 will be along any minute now with a link.

Just like koshergrl will post links to her claim that this is not about getting use of land for free.

Right?

How ridiculous. Everybody else knows what the issue is....if you are too stupid to read the material please do everybody a favor and quit wasting bandwidth.

IOW, you're wrong and you know it.

Gotta go but if you can come up with some proof of your claim "They want the Fed's to surrender the property they stole to state control." (whatever THAT means!), by all means post it.

Prove that the land was stolen from the welfare ranchers.

Same to peach174

Still no facts from koshergrl or peach174

I've posted reams of facts, names, and history. You're too stupid to read, and that's not my problem. Back on ignore you go, loser.

 

[Agit8r]

I wonder what would happen if the BLM supporters had been as well armed as Bundy's supporters when they protested? Think a race war would have broken out?

The difference of course is that the militia aren't attacking anybody. And the Harney county group are protesting specific tyrannical actions...not just 'bad police arrests us when we loot!'

Yeah. they are just mad because judges sentenced a couple of arsonists. boo hoo

 

[Tilly]

Do you think someones neighbours should be on their jury?

A jury of your peers, silly ass.

A jury of ones peers is fine, neighbours, which is what was posted, is not fine, silly ass.

You arguing about the meaning of "neighbor" all day is what is silly.

No it isn't. The idea of a jury is that they are unencumbered by personal knowledge, experiences, grievances, or biases against the defendant. 'Neighbours' don't normally fall into that category. Clearly its not a word you should have used, so get over it already.

historically, juries were from the same community as the accused or the litigant. they did know the person. in modern times, the juries are not supposed to know anything about the case before them.

so i'm not quite certain what you're talking about

Clearly I'm talking about now and the importance of jury members not knowing the accused. How can you be unclear about such a simple concept?

 

[Tilly]

Ah, I didn't realise that. Thank you.

Watch yerself n00b!!!

seems more sock-ish than noob. no?

Really? So another poster with a crystal ball. Who am I then? Lol.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Ah, I didn't realise that. Thank you.

Watch yerself n00b!!!

seems more sock-ish than noob. no?

Really? So another poster with a crystal ball. Who am I then? Lol.

Pay little attention to deflection, it only reveals you're under her skin

 

[koshergrl]

Two ranchers accidently burn some brush and the Liberals call it terrorism. A few hundred Black Lives Matter protesters intentionally burn a couple city blocks and they call it justice.

How fucked up is that?

You are playing down what they were convicted of. This is lightly populated county and the ranchers were convicted by a jury made up of the local folks. The government alone did not convict them. Their neighbors convicted them. Add the fact that they have accepted the ruling of the court and disavowed any relationship to the people who have taken over the wildlife refuge and a more accurate assessment can be made. The domestic terrorists are not speaking for the ranchers or the people who live in that area.

Do you think someones neighbours should be on their jury?

A jury of your peers, silly ass.

A jury of ones peers is fine, neighbours, which is what was posted, is not fine, silly ass.

Their jury was from Pendleton, two hours away. The judge at the time addressed the minimum sentencing issue based on the fact that it was wildly out of proportion to the "crime".

Meanwhile, the crazy progressive bitch who lit a hundred thousand acres because she and her buddies were bored got 13 months.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Free logs, free ore and free grazing rights.

And of course, free rent. For 'years, if necessary'.

Yep, Skylar! Did you see the guy on TV that just joined up with the Bundy thugs? He has said goodbye to his family and claims he is willing to give his life if necessary for the 'cause'. It's one of those situations where you laugh at the absurdity, and cry at the stupidity.

Then he stated it would never get that far. .

So he said he would die there for no reason?

He said they were seeking peaceful negotiations. Not blood shed.

Get back to be when they call for the police to be "fried like bacon".

They want "peaceful negotiations" about their law breaking?

Why did they bring guns then?

They said they are willing to kill and/or be killed.

That's the opposite of "peaceful".

Its funny, blue gin actually considers mean words to be more threatening that bringing guns and sayin they are willing to die there.

Because their white

 

[peach174]

Who did they steal the land from. Name the original owners before the Feds owned it. Right here: ________________

Allie....when can we be expecting an answer as to who owned that land before the Feds?

As well as what peach174 said -

Feds holding and leasing BLM land is not abuse, but taking land that belongs to ranchers that holds deeds is.

This is a claim I have never heard before but I'm sure that peach174 will be along any minute now with a link.

Just like koshergrl will post links to her claim that this is not about getting use of land for free.

Right?

How ridiculous. Everybody else knows what the issue is....if you are too stupid to read the material please do everybody a favor and quit wasting bandwidth.

IOW, you're wrong and you know it.

Gotta go but if you can come up with some proof of your claim "They want the Fed's to surrender the property they stole to state control." (whatever THAT means!), by all means post it.

Prove that the land was stolen from the welfare ranchers.

Same to peach174

Still no facts from koshergrl or peach174

I lost my internet around 8:15 a.m. or so this morning.
Just got it back around 6:30 tonight.
Talk to you all tomorrow.

 

[koshergrl]

Yep, Skylar! Did you see the guy on TV that just joined up with the Bundy thugs? He has said goodbye to his family and claims he is willing to give his life if necessary for the 'cause'. It's one of those situations where you laugh at the absurdity, and cry at the stupidity.

Then he stated it would never get that far. .

So he said he would die there for no reason?

He said they were seeking peaceful negotiations. Not blood shed.

Get back to be when they call for the police to be "fried like bacon".

They want "peaceful negotiations" about their law breaking?

Why did they bring guns then?

They said they are willing to kill and/or be killed.

That's the opposite of "peaceful".

Its funny, blue gin actually considers mean words to be more threatening that bringing guns and sayin they are willing to die there.

Because their white

That's because sane people distinguish between animals who have stated a desire to kill innocents, and good guys who have stated a desire to protect them.

 

[Agit8r]

Then he stated it would never get that far. .

So he said he would die there for no reason?

He said they were seeking peaceful negotiations. Not blood shed.

Get back to be when they call for the police to be "fried like bacon".

They want "peaceful negotiations" about their law breaking?

Why did they bring guns then?

They said they are willing to kill and/or be killed.

That's the opposite of "peaceful".

Its funny, blue gin actually considers mean words to be more threatening that bringing guns and sayin they are willing to die there.

Because their white

That's because sane people distinguish between animals who have stated a desire to kill innocents, and good guys who have stated a desire to protect them.

And yet, the insurgents in OR are using Children as human shields, just like other terrorists do.

 

[koshergrl]

So he said he would die there for no reason?

He said they were seeking peaceful negotiations. Not blood shed.

Get back to be when they call for the police to be "fried like bacon".

They want "peaceful negotiations" about their law breaking?

Why did they bring guns then?

They said they are willing to kill and/or be killed.

That's the opposite of "peaceful".

Its funny, blue gin actually considers mean words to be more threatening that bringing guns and sayin they are willing to die there.

Because their white

That's because sane people distinguish between animals who have stated a desire to kill innocents, and good guys who have stated a desire to protect them.

And yet, the insurgents in OR are using Children as human shields, just like other terrorists do.

no they aren't, how lame. They're coming and going at will. They haven't threatened anyone or done anything except occupy an empty building. Don't be such a liar.

 

[Agit8r]

He said they were seeking peaceful negotiations. Not blood shed.

Get back to be when they call for the police to be "fried like bacon".

They want "peaceful negotiations" about their law breaking?

Why did they bring guns then?

They said they are willing to kill and/or be killed.

That's the opposite of "peaceful".

Its funny, blue gin actually considers mean words to be more threatening that bringing guns and sayin they are willing to die there.

Because their white

That's because sane people distinguish between animals who have stated a desire to kill innocents, and good guys who have stated a desire to protect them.

And yet, the insurgents in OR are using Children as human shields, just like other terrorists do.

no they aren't, how lame. They're coming and going at will. They haven't threatened anyone or done anything except occupy an empty building. Don't be such a liar.

What do you suppose will happen when the Feds come to reclaim the property, for its intended legal use?

 

[koshergrl]

They want "peaceful negotiations" about their law breaking?

Why did they bring guns then?

They said they are willing to kill and/or be killed.

That's the opposite of "peaceful".

Its funny, blue gin actually considers mean words to be more threatening that bringing guns and sayin they are willing to die there.

Because their white

That's because sane people distinguish between animals who have stated a desire to kill innocents, and good guys who have stated a desire to protect them.

And yet, the insurgents in OR are using Children as human shields, just like other terrorists do.

no they aren't, how lame. They're coming and going at will. They haven't threatened anyone or done anything except occupy an empty building. Don't be such a liar.

What do you suppose will happen when the Feds come to reclaim the property, for its intended legal use?

Oh you mean when they decide to open a gift shop? And the public restrooms..that they close during the winter? Lol shut the fuck up, loser. There are no kids in danger, except from the Fed's.

 

[Dot Com]

You only have Republicorp and their paymasters in the prison industrial complex to blame for mandatory minimums

 

[Tilly]

So he said he would die there for no reason?

He said they were seeking peaceful negotiations. Not blood shed.

Get back to be when they call for the police to be "fried like bacon".

They want "peaceful negotiations" about their law breaking?

Why did they bring guns then?

They said they are willing to kill and/or be killed.

That's the opposite of "peaceful".

Its funny, blue gin actually considers mean words to be more threatening that bringing guns and sayin they are willing to die there.

Because their white

That's because sane people distinguish between animals who have stated a desire to kill innocents, and good guys who have stated a desire to protect them.

And yet, the insurgents in OR are using Children as human shields, just like other terrorists do.

One of the protesters, Duane Ehmer, speaks to the media

Several children also came along although the militia men said the youngsters were visitors who were not staying on the site.

Inside the Oregon refuge seized by militiamen - BBC News

 

[Tilly]

Its funny, blue gin actually considers mean words to be more threatening that bringing guns and sayin they are willing to die there.

Because their white

That's because sane people distinguish between animals who have stated a desire to kill innocents, and good guys who have stated a desire to protect them.

And yet, the insurgents in OR are using Children as human shields, just like other terrorists do.

no they aren't, how lame. They're coming and going at will. They haven't threatened anyone or done anything except occupy an empty building. Don't be such a liar.

What do you suppose will happen when the Feds come to reclaim the property, for its intended legal use?

Oh you mean when they decide to open a gift shop? And the public restrooms..that they close during the winter? Lol shut the fuck up, loser. There are no kids in danger, except from the Fed's.

Ive read several reports of local families visiting the site with their kids. Human shields. Lol.