DrLove
Diamond Member
No, I am completely in line with the truth.No you didn’t, moron. Rasmussen was right on 2016 and Nate Silver was embarrassed because he was so wrong.Look up Rasmussen’s prediction for 2016 just before the election.
Stay in denial.
Oh I have - and it's nonsense. Razzy robo-polls and they call primarily those with land lines (old people). Robos are only slightly better than online polls. You get people with nothing better to do. Younger people hang up on them. Polling guru Nate Silver rates them a C+ for accuracy.
Donald Trump tweet on 50% approval cherry-picks polling data
Btw - Scott Rasmussen starting out writing columns for WorldNutDaily![]()
Nate Silver is irrelevant now that he said that Hillary had a 92% chance to win the election the day of.
You're lying again - no surprise of course![]()
Nate Silver went from being a polling God to a joke in one day.
Rasmussen has been so bad that most experts toss them out.
Were Real Clear to do the same, Dotard's polling average would be 3-4 points lower.
![pollaccuracy.png](https://img.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/files/2016/12/pollaccuracy.png)